We investigated the difference in radiation dose between the two imaging technique by dividing the patients undergoing cardiac angiography a (857 cases) and coronary intervention (142 cases) into the biplane group and the single-plane group to Fluoroscopy time, fluoroscopy dose, number of cineangiography runs, cineangiography dose, total dose and amount of contrast media were compared and examined in the both groups. In the cardiac angiography, 487 cases in the biplane group were significantly higher in fluoroscopy time, fluoroscopy dose, number of cineangiography, fluoroscopy dose, cineangiography dose and total dose than 370 cases in the single-plane group while the contrast load used was significantly lower. Also in coronary intervention, 37 cases in the biplane group showed significantly higher fluoroscopy time, fluoroscopy dose, number of cineangiography runs, cineangiography dose and total dose than 105 cases in the single-plane group, however there was no difference in amount of contrast media. Since biplane imaging leads to increase the radiation dose, we should select imaging technique according to the procedure and patient condition.
View full abstract