Ground improvement techniques are widely adopted in geotechnical engineering practices for improving the strength, density, and/or reducing drainage characteristics of the soil. Among the various options available for improving the soil, dynamic compaction (also referred to as impact densification, heavy tamping, and dynamic consolidation) has evolved as a widely accepted method of soil improvement in the past decade for treating poor soils in situ. This method is often an economically attractive alternative for utilizing shallow foundations and preparing subgrade for construction, as compared to other conventional expensive solutions like pile foundations, excavation and replacement, densification etc. Moreover, dynamic compaction has some unique applications, including treatment of reclaimed land, liquefaction mitigation and heterogeneous fill materials, and displacing unsuitable materials such as peat, and collapsing sinkholes. In general, the ultimate goals of dynamic compaction are to increase the bearing capacity of the soil, and decrease the total and differential settlements within a specified depth of improvement. Till date, the effective depth of improvement achieved through this technique has been restricted to about 5m of the soil. To increase the effectiveness of dynamic compaction, the soil condition and the energy configuration (which is decided by the surface area and the shape of the tamper used) has to be taken into account. In the present paper, an attempt has been made to investigate the impact of tamper base area in improving the influence depth during dynamic compaction on sandy soil. For this purpose, an innovative dynamic compaction set-up was developed in the laboratory for carrying out small-scale physical model tests on low energy dynamic compaction using circular steel tampers of three diameters (50 mm, 75 mm and 100 mm). This paper describes details of the dynamic compaction set-up developed, and its advantages over other compaction set-ups developed till date with respect to evaluation of dynamic compaction technique in the laboratory. In general, it was observed that, the width of area influenced by dynamic compaction is proportional to almost 2.5 times the tamper diameter. However, the tamper base area was found to exhibit marginal influence on the depth of improvement, provided the impact energy intensity was kept constant in all the three tests.
View full abstract