The present study compared the explanatory verbal expressions of children who were presented with still pictures and motion pictures and examined the effectiveness of these visual stimuli for eliciting explanatory expressions. In study 1, typically developing children were assigned three tasks: a still picture task, a motion picture task, and a motion picture followed by a still picture(motion-still condition)task. The verbal descriptions of the situations by the children were compared between these three tasks. Results showed that motion pictures facilitated understanding of situations, whereas still pictures promoted verbal expression by accessing visual information during speech. The motion-still condition was found to yield verbal output that was rich in content and syntactically more complex, which reflected the individual merits of both the still and motion conditions. In study 2, the still picture and the motionstill picture tasks were assigned to children with intellectual disabilities, and data were compared with those of study 1. The motion-still picture condition yielded linguistically richer and more complex verbal output. Furthermore, the children’s understanding of the presented situations was observed to be more appropriate than in the still picture condition. However, the improvements in children with intellectual disabilities were smaller than those in typically developing children. The effectiveness of the combined use of still and motion pictures was discussed.
View full abstract