Journal of Rural Medicine
Online ISSN : 1880-4888
Print ISSN : 1880-487X
ISSN-L : 1880-487X
Volume 3, Issue 2
Displaying 1-5 of 5 articles from this issue
Original Articles
  • Yoshito Momose, Takajiro Suenaga, Hiroshi Une
    Article type: Original article
    2008 Volume 3 Issue 2 Pages 29-33
    Published: 2008
    Released on J-STAGE: December 26, 2008
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Objective: Job satisfaction and mental distress may contribute to mental illness, particularly in regard to depression and even suicide. The aim of this study was to investigate the level of job satisfaction and its relationship to the level of mental distress among farmers in comparison to non-farming rural residents.
    Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey of 7,000 rural residents was performed to assess the level of job satisfaction and mental distress. Mental distress was measured using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). The adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated by means of multivariate logistic regression models.
    Results: A total of 5,364 rural residents (1,888 farmers and 3,476 non-farmers) responded, therefore yielding a response rate of 76.6%. Twenty-five percent of the farmers and 24 percent of non-farmers were either very dissatisfied or somewhat dissatisfied with their jobs. Twenty-five percent of the farmers and 29 percent of non-farmers had mental distress (GHQ score of 4 or above). The crude odds ratio of mental distress among dissatisfied farmers in comparison to satisfied farmers was 4.38 (95% CI = 3.49-5.51). Similarly, the crude odds ratio of mental distress among dissatisfied non-farmers in comparison to satisfied non-farmers was 5.01 (95% CI = 4.19-5.98). These statistically significant odds ratios remained even after controlling for age, gender and family structure. The most important cause of mental distress among farmers was related to family finances. Among non-farmers, however, the most important cause of mental distress tended to be human relations in the workplace.
    Conclusion: Although farmers experienced similar levels of job satisfaction and mental distress in comparison to non-farmers, the most important cause of mental distress differed between farmers and non-farmers. As the underlying risks for this level of job satisfaction, family finances are therefore considered to be a potentially hazardous factor in regard to mental distress for farmers.
    Download PDF (190K)
Case Reports
Field Report (Nursing research)
  • Kenzo Shibayama, Yasuko Yoshikawa
    Article type: Field report (Nursing research)
    2008 Volume 3 Issue 2 Pages 45-48
    Published: 2008
    Released on J-STAGE: December 26, 2008
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Objective: The present study investigated the health-related quality of life (QOL) of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
    Methods: Forty-three patients were asked to complete the SF-36 questionnaire at discharge and 6 months after discharge. The SF-36 consists of 8 subscales: Physical Functioning (PF), Role Physical (RP), Bodily Pain (BP), General Health perception (GH), Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), Role Emotional (RE), and Mental Health (MH). We calculated mean scores and standard deviations for these 8 subscales at discharge and 6 months after discharge. Values were compared using the paired student t-test.
    Results: The PF and BP scores after 6 months were significantly higher than those at discharge, but there were no significant differences in the other subscales.
    Conclusions: Some of the physical parameters of health-related QOL may improve 6 months after discharge in AMI patients treated with PCI. Since PCI may relieve symptoms such chest pain and chest discomfort, these patients can gradually extend their daily activities. While the physical state may improve, mental health-related QOL does not appear to improve 6 months after discharge.
    Download PDF (172K)
feedback
Top