Journal of Rural Medicine
Online ISSN : 1880-4888
Print ISSN : 1880-487X
ISSN-L : 1880-487X
Volume 5, Issue 1
Displaying 1-4 of 4 articles from this issue
Special Issue
Review
  • Hiroshi Nagami
    Article type: Review
    2010 Volume 5 Issue 1 Pages 129-133
    Published: 2010
    Released on J-STAGE: July 09, 2010
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    The use of pesticides has rapidly increased in Japan since the end of World War II, significantly reducing work burdens and boosting food production. In the meantime, pesticides, responsible for poisoning and environmental pollution, have for many years posed grave issues that have had to be tackled by scientists of rural medicine for a long period. The Japanese Association of Rural Medicine, founded by the late Toshikazu Wakatsuki, has grappled with those issues for many years. Above all, the association has fulfilled its social obligations, such as by bringing the toxicity of organic mercury to light in animal tests to prompt the government to prohibit its use, and by casting light on birth defects caused by defoliants aerially sprayed during the Vietnam War to urge U.S. military forces to break off herbicide warfare. As it has become possible to make less toxic pesticides available for farm work in recent years, death-inducing accidents have seldom occurred during the spraying of pesticides, and the association’s activities are now at a low ebb. Now that pesticides, which after all are biologically toxic compounds, are openly used on farms, there is the need to pay constant attention to their impacts on the human body and the environment. In the future, it is necessary to epidemiologically probe into chronic impacts on the human body and contribute to the prevention of pesticide poisoning in Southeast Asia.
    Download PDF (59K)
Original Article
  • Hidetoshi Akita, Takehiko Okamura, Taku Naiki, Daisuke Nagata, Keiichi ...
    Article type: Original article
    2010 Volume 5 Issue 1 Pages 134-139
    Published: 2010
    Released on J-STAGE: July 09, 2010
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Objective: We carried out this study to clarify whether operative methods of laparoscopic prostatectomy (LRP) could become a standard therapy. The purpose was to evaluate the technical feasibility, oncologic effectiveness and perioperative and postoperative morbidity of LRP performed by a general urologist.
    Patients and Methods: Between June 2004 and May 2006, 30 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer consecutively underwent LRP by a single surgeon. Oncologic data were assessed by histopathological examination and by postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels.
    Results: Complete laparoscopic removal of the prostate and seminal vesicles was achieved in all 30 patients. The average operation time was 250.9 min (range, 168 to 394 min). The total positive surgical margin rate was 20.7% (6 of 29 cases), with a total PSA recurrence rate was 23.3% (7 of 30 cases), but the frequencies tended to be decreased in the later phase cases. Perioperative complications were encountered in 5 patients; four of these patients were in the initial 10 cases. Two of the 30 cases (6.7%) required a blood transfusion (first case and 11th case). There were three surgical complications, one ureter injury, one rectal injury and one sigmoid serosal injury. The catheter duration intervals were reduced in the later cases.
    Conclusions: From our experience with one surgeon, with whom perioperative complications were concentrated in the initial 10 cases, we conclude that LRP should be performed by experienced surgeons after intensive training.
    Download PDF (344K)
Case Report
  • Hidenobu Kawabata, Manabu Murakami, Kengo Kisa, Yuya Kimura, Masaji Ma ...
    Article type: Case report
    2010 Volume 5 Issue 1 Pages 140-143
    Published: 2010
    Released on J-STAGE: July 09, 2010
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) have recently occurred in communities in people lacking known healthcare risk factors. This MRSA infection is referred to as community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) infection, and is distinct from hospital-associated MRSA infection, which occurs in people with risk factors. We experienced a patient diagnosed with CA-MRSA cellulitis, as culture of pus revealed MRSA and he had not been exposed to healthcare environments for the past year. The patient was a previously healthy 38-year-old man with suppurative cellulitis in his right index finger following injury to the finger at his worksite. The cellulitis was successfully managed with incision and drainage (I&D), followed by cefazolin during a 10-day clinical course, although the patient’s MRSA strain was resistant to cefazolin. There are several reports that suggest that I&D followed by antibiotic treatment for CA-MRSA skin infection produces equivalent clinical outcomes, whether the antibiotic prescribed was effective or not. Given that MRSA emerged in an outpatient setting, CA-MRSA should be considered a possible etiology of skin infection in healthy individuals with no classical risk factors for acquisition of MRSA.
    Download PDF (47K)
feedback
Top