Background Brentuximab vedotin plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (BV-CHP) has demonstrated survival benefits over cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) in patients with CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) in a randomized, clinical trial. However, data on the real-world effectiveness of BV-CHP in routine clinical practice remain limited.
Methods We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed PTCL treated at institutions within the Gifu Hematology Study Group. Patients received BV-CHP, CHOP, or cyclophosphamide, pirarubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (THP-COP) as first-line therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and overall response rate (ORR) were compared among the treatment groups. Exploratory subgroup analyses were performed, including analyses by bone marrow involvement at diagnosis.
Results A total of 154 patients were included: 29 received BV-CHP, 72 received CHOP, and 53 received THP-COP. Overall, no significant differences were observed in PFS, OS, or ORR among the three treatment groups. In exploratory subgroup analyses, patients with bone marrow involvement who were treated with BV-CHP (n = 4) had significantly shorter PFS than those treated with CHOP (n = 17) or THP-COP (n = 15), whereas no significant difference in OS was observed.
Conclusions In this real-world multicenter cohort from the Gifu Hematology Study Group, frontline BV-CHP did not demonstrate a survival advantage over CHOP or THP-COP in unselected patients with PTCL. These findings suggest that THP-COP remains a reasonable first-line treatment option in routine clinical practice. The inferior PFS observed in patients with bone marrow involvement treated with BV-CHP should be interpreted cautiously and warrants further investigation.
抄録全体を表示