This paper describes the quantitative measurement of painted wood material in its belt sanding and buffing process. The authors tried also to examine the quantitative expression of its finished surface in connection with the experiment.
The results obtained are summarized as follows;
(1) The sanding pressure in hand work by some workers were measured by means of the loadcell. (Fig. 4) The values range from 15 to 25g/cm
2 (Fig. 7).
(2) The influence of the sanding pressure, the running speed of the belt, the mesh number of the abrasive belt and the running time, on the sanding efficiency and the surface roughness was clarified. These relations are represented in the equations
5.1, 5.2 and also in Fig. 8.
(3) The movement of the hand-block in the sanding performance is recorded by the high-speed camera, and the kinematic locus is analyzed based on these pictures (Fig. 9). The result is broken down in to the following types, the wavy, like a horse's hoof, the spiral and in the straight line (Fig. 10).
(4) The contact sanding time on the specimen has been obtained from the kinematic locus. Its mean value is 1.6sec. (maximum 2.2sec, minimum 1.0sec) at usual sanding condition.
(5) The comparison of the finished surface in roughness at various stages of its sanding process is possible by making models of the sanding process which are to be obtained from the equations
5.1 and
5.2 (Fig. 12).
(6) In order to measure and record the buffing pressure when the buffing table was moved, T type loadcell (Fig. 5) was produced. The relations between the buffing pressure and the shift value of the pressing the specimen or contact width were determined. The one was defined as linear function and the other was defined as exponential function (Fig. 13).
(7) When the buffing cylinder was brought into cantact with the specimen, it was considered that there were two contact parts. One worked efficiently to the buffing purpose, while the other but poorly though the contact was perfect.
(8) In order to express quantitatively the mirrorlike gloss of its finished surface, a test chart (Fig. 6) was designed. The glossiness is expressed on the test chart in degrees of distinctiveness of the reflected image. By this method the comparative glossiness of the finished surface to the mirror is satisfactorily expressed in degrees.
(9) The effect of pressure and time of buffing on the finished surface was measured (Fig. 14). In proportion to the increase in pressure and time of buffing, the glossiness of the surface gained, and this tendency was particularly remarkable as the grit size of the finished abrasive belt was rough.
View full abstract