1. In April 1974, a schizochroismic or buff-mutant
Corvus macrorhynchos was observed among a group of young birds in the Imperial Palace garden.
Three years later in 1977, possibly the same bird, presumed to be a male, occurred, with his 'normal' mate, in the territory of "A pair", to usurp its nesting tree, which was in my garden, about 1.5km from the Imperial Palace.
2.This would indicate that young crows may pass 3-4 years before first breeding.
3. The "buff pair" continued territorial quarrels between "A" and "D" pairs and occupied their territory between them. But, the territorial boundary changed through the season and by year, especially between that of "A pair".
4. Thus, the "buff pair" might haven't succeed to raise their young, although their possible nest was found and nest-site selection behavior was observed, during their territorial life of four years until 1981, when the buff-mutant male disappeared (Observations in years 1979-'80 were insufficient).
5. In years 1969-'70, the "A pair" had a territory size as large as 45ha, but lost more than 3/4 area in 1977, by invasion of "buff pair", maintaining only about 10ha.
6. This small territorial size of about 10ha is, however, about the same as or even larger than grouped territories at Roppongi.
7. In this area a pair raised two young safely in one of the trees in a small territory of about 6ha within a parking area surrounded by buildings.
8. The city condition with small houses (and only few large buildings) and good distant sight, and that with many high buildings and restricted sight, were compared with open country and forest conditions respectively.
9. In small house or open cities, the communication between members of a pair or finding of intruding rivals, is possible at long distances and human garbages, which are main food source for city crows, are scattered by small amounts. Under such conditions, the crows would hold a large territory.
10. In high-building cities, the mutual or rival sight is restricted to short ranges and large amount of garbages from buildings are collected at certain places. Therefore, a small territory is advantageous for defense and enough food supply can be obtained within it.
11. The "A pair" territory in 1969-'70 at Akasaka of 45ha is considered to have been a maximum territory size under "small-house city" condition, while, by the time when the "buff pair" invaded into it in 1977, many large buildings had been constructed and this area was already a "high building city". This may have made the "buff pair" succeed to invade deep into "A pair's" territory, which was oppressed to almost 1/4 (about 10ha) of the original size. However, this probably the minimum territory size (about 8-10ha) was found to be common and stable in "high-building" area at Roppongi.
12. It would follow that if only an enough food supply (human garbage) could be available, the crows may inhabit "high-building" area in fairly high density maintaining small territories.
13. But, if building garbage were more perfectly managed (not allowing the use by crows), crows would rely on natural foods of parks or garden area, showing patchy distribution and occupying large territory.
14. In a large territory of "small-house city" zone, that included some wooded hills and gardens where some natural food was available beside human garbage, three chicks were raised (as in Akasaka, 1967-'70), but in small territories of "high-building" area, where human garbage only is the food source, the brood size may be limited to two chicks, as observed in two cases in Rappongi area.
View full abstract