Generally, the aerodynamic force coefficients of railway vehicles are determined through wind tunnel tests that simulate the interaction between the vehicle and track structures under turbulent boundary layer flow conditions. In most conventional crosswind wind tunnel tests, aerodynamic forces are measured on a stationary vehicle model placed on representative track structures. In actual operation, however, the relative wind direction acting on a train may vary owing to changes in natural wind direction, train acceleration or deceleration, or passage through curved track sections. To evaluate aerodynamic forces under such varying wind-direction conditions, this study measured the surface pressure distribution on a vehicle model mounted on a rotating turntable. Wind tunnel tests were carried out in the large low-noise wind tunnel of the Railway Technical Research Institute using a 1/40-scale model of a typical commuter train placed on a low-embankment structure. A turbulent boundary layer representing natural wind was generated upstream of the turntable. Surface pressures measured on the vehicle body were used to calculate the side force and lift force coefficients. The results obtained under rotational conditions, in which the relative wind direction changed continuously from 0-90°, were compared with those under stationary conditions corresponding to conventional tests. The results showed that no clear difference was observed in the side-force coefficient between stationary and rotational conditions. In contrast, the lift-force coefficient under rotational conditions differed clearly from that under stationary conditions, and its tendency also depended on the direction of rotation. Although the maximum difference in lift-force coefficient was notable, its influence on the critical wind speed for overturning was considered limited because lift force contributes less to overturning safety than side force. These findings suggest that wind-direction changes can affect the aerodynamic characteristics of railway vehicles.
View full abstract