Macbeth has two distinct problems. First, it lacks a discernible correspondence between the man and his deed. \lacbeth's evil deeds can't be easily connected NNit h him who is, indeed, good-natured; honest, brave, honourable, conscientious and virtuous. Secondly, it has the criminal as its tragic hero. These problems seem to be solved from the point of 'the Oedipus complex' Nay, with the very viewpoint that Macbeth is motivated from the unconscious impulse stemming from the obscurer region of his mind, we can consider what he does in relation to what he is. Furthermore, it can be said that, because we have this impulse of our own, we can identify with him and experience the tragic world through which he struggles, without being divorced from him and becoming critics of him. Many other problems, however, remain unresolved by 'the Oedipus complex'; what is the misty mood hovering all over the work?what is the reality of the weird witches? why can they have such a great influence on Macbeth? why are the characters' speeches so illogical? These problems require consideration from an angle related with infants' internal experience prior to the Oedipal phase, I suppose. Julia Kristeva can be named as one of representative psychoanalysts who have laid emphasis on the early phase of childhood. And these problems can be worked out by her theories, which also make it clear what a mental attitude Shakespeare assumed in writing Mach
View full abstract