The aim of this paper is to compares ideas of freedom and public policy based on capabilities in Thomas Hill Green and Amartya Sen and to clarify Green's position in the history of the capabilities approach.
In Green's view, freedom means the possession of the internal capacities (will and reason) necessary to recognize and realize the capabilities that is ideal life. The business of public policy is to maintain the conditions for freedom and removing obstacles to it. From the social reforms advocated by Green, interference with the conditions of peoplés internal capacities is limited, but rather the maintenance of external conditions and the removal of obstacles related to health, physical and living conditions for the actual realization of what is worth. Therefore, it can be said that the prerequisite for human freedom in Green is an external condition or environment that enables the realization of what is worth, and only after these conditions are met can humans be free.
In Sen's view, freedom means the opportunity to choose and achieve what one actually wants to achieve from a variety of opportunities to do or be something―capabilities―. By focusing on this, Sen's approach directly focuses on well-being and freedom. Poverty means the lack of the basic capabilities that are minimally necessary to achieve such opportunities and well-being. It is development that provides the basic capabilities necessary to achieve well-being. Public policies are made by the state to achieve development. Its role is to provide people the opportunity to choose their way of life. With the help of such policies, people can become free.
In terms of how they view freedom, they both stand on the perspective of positive freedom, which focuses on being able to achieve something. Therefore, they both believe that we are free to realize something with the help of others. However, they differ greatly in the perspective of what is worth and its realization. They also differ greatly in the way they view capabilities. These interpretations are not in conflict with each other. Although there are differences between them, they can be considered as complementary. The perspective of public policy is that both policies are generally consistent with each other in terms of policy ideas.
In view of Sen's philosophy, every person must be able to choose any functionings (vector) from a capability for freedom. Or, as a starting point, sufficient provision of basic capabilities is required. In the case of Green, however, freedom goes beyond the minimum human choices, but at least the ability to choose the specific good functionings (vectors) that will enable one's own life toward the life that should be matched to each of them. In this case, it is not necessarily necessary to be able to choose any functions (vector). For example, it is not necessary for an artist who has no interest in being a man of letters to be able to choose the function (vector) of becoming a top man of letters.
抄録全体を表示