In this study, the regulatory decision-making process concerning faults within the site of the Tsuruga Nuclear Power Plant was examined to identify major issues essential for achieving rational regulation. An analysis of the regulatory rules applied in this process, together with meeting records, revealed the following deficiencies:
1. The hazard of fault displacement events has not been evaluated in terms of both occurrence frequency and potential consequences.
2. The latest scientific knowledge on secondary faults has not been adequately incorporated.
3. Regulatory rules have been formulated without clearly defining the classification of events, such as design-basis events.
4. The specificity required of legal and regulatory standards is insufficient.
5. Reasonable mitigation measures have not been recommended for other nuclear power plants facing similar concerns.
6. Expert knowledge has not been utilized appropriately.
On the basis of these findings, the current regulatory decision-making process can be evaluated as lacking the rationality required of conformity assessments to regulatory standards. It is therefore concluded that a systematic re-examination of the validity of this process and the implementation of appropriate corrective measures where deficiencies are identified constitute urgent tasks.
抄録全体を表示