Several procedures of lithotripsy for common bile duct (CBD) stones were certified and were reported. However, it is controversial which option is the best therapeutic strategy for CBD stone lithotripsy. Regarding the advantage of preserving sphincter contraction and the efficient combination of procedures, we compared each management and estimate whether extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is able to be a first choice for CBD stone's management. Without any additional procedure, the complete stone extraction rate was achieved in 83.3% of patients in the EST group, in 80.8% in the EPBD group, and in 67.6% in the ESWL group, however, to analyse the therapeutic effect of each procedure on the stone size, patients were divided into the two subgroups by stone size (group A; stone diameter <10 mm, group B; stone diameter≥10 mm). In group A, this rate was achieved in 100% in the EST, in 90.0% in the EPBD, and in 69.2% in the ESWL, in contrast, in group B,60.0% in the EST, in 42.9% in the EPBD, and in 62.5% in the ESWL. The analysis of components of stone residues that resist to ESWL showed that the rigidity of stone was soft in 92.9%.
These results suggest that for the management of CBD stones, ESWL will be recommended as a first choice, especially for large stone and reveal that ESWL is not proper procedure for the stone which rigidity is not so hard.
View full abstract