Purpose: Ten years ago, we introduced fluorescence
in situ hybridization (FISH) into clinical practice as a companion diagnostic test for
HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer. We summarize here our FISH data during the last 3 years, and discuss the points at issue of this diagnostic test.
Patients and methods: Of a total of 521 cases diagnosed with breast cancer and investigated for HER2 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) between 2011 and 2013, 91 cases with IHC score of 2+ were subjected to the FISH test. Using the PathVysion HER-2 DNA Probe Kit, we counted the number of HER2 and CEP17 signals in 20 or more cancer cells, and a ratio of HER2/CEP17 ≥2 was defined as positive for HER2 amplification, while a ratio <2 was defined as negative.
Results and discussion: Fourteen (15%) cases were FISH positive and 77 (85%) cases were FISH negative for
HER2 amplification. In the FISH-positive group, the mean HER2 signal number per nucleus was 6.5 (range, 2~30) and that of CEP17 was 2.0 (range, 1~5), while in the FISH-negative group, the mean HER2 signal number was 3.2 (range, 1~14) and that of CEP17 was 2.8 (range 1~9). Increased HER2 signal numbers in the negative group were mainly attributable to polysomy of chromosome 17. Although the assessment of test results in the majority of cases was undemanding, there were equivocal cases in which the HER2/CEP17 ratio was close to 2.0. In FISH specimens prepared from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, nuclear truncation by sectioning leading to loss of DNA material can occur, and non-overlapping intact nuclei for scoring and areas of invasive tumor may not necessarily be identified. Thus, a considerable amount of practice with FISH assay is necessary to correctly define the presence of a FISH abnormality.
View full abstract