【はじめに】
　2002年の健康増進法成立に伴い、2003年から始まった 「健康日本21」の推進は、改正を加えながら現在まで効 果的に推進されてきた。この健康増進法第５章第２節に 記載された受動喫煙の防止の対象施設の中に、交通機関 も含まれていることから、大分県タクシー協会では2006 年に全車禁煙化を実施した。その1年経過後の2007年に は、タクシー全車禁煙後の状況を把握するために、禁煙 健康ネット大分（kk大分）・奈良女子大学高橋研究室合 同で大分市のタクシー協会に所属する経営者調査を実施 し報告している1)。前回調査結果では、市内のタクシーの 全車禁煙化から1年が経過した当時、タクシー会社の経営 者は全車禁煙化をおおむね肯定的に捉えており、職場環 境の改善につながったと認識している者が多いことが明 らかになった。今回は、大分県内のタクシー全車禁煙化 後６年目の経営者調査として、大分県内のタクシー会社 の経営者に同様の調査を実施したので報告する。

抄録全体を表示

Abstract
[Background] There exists no simultaneous research examin-ing actual conditions of second-hand smoke prevention meas-ures at a number of universities and knowledge and awareness of faculty members working there on them. Due to this, the actual situations of knowledge and awareness of faculty mem-bers on second-hand smoke prevention measures implemented at universities have not been clarified. Thus, we researched the current conditions of second-hand smoke prevention measures at medical/welfare related universities and knowl-edge and awareness of faculty members on them.
[Methods] We sent requests for cooperation to the research to the presidents of 21 universities with medical, nursing or welfare departments in Hyogo Prefecture and conducted a survey on anti-smoking conditions at 6 universities which agreed to cooperate. At the same time, we also targeted 861 faculty members at the 6 universities and researched their knowledge and awareness on second-hand smoke prevention measures. For the survey, we adopted the placement method utilizing anonymous automatic-recording questionnaires and conducted the survey from February to September 2011. The survey was implemented after ethical review by the university the researchers belonged to.
[Results] 502 of 861 faculty members (58.3%) at the 6 univer-sities responded. For analysis, we only used valid responses from 495 people (57.5%). According to the anti-smoking clas-sification, 3 universities (285 members belonged to) were non-smoking facilities and 3 universities (210 members belonged to) were smoking facilities. 73% of the faculty members at non-smoking facilities and 59.6% at smoking facilities properly understood their anti-smoking classifications. 21.5% of re-spondents from non-smoking facilities and 47.9％ from smok-ing facilities answered that they were exposed to second-hand smoke, indicating a significant difference (p＜0.001).
[Conclusion] Although medical/welfare related universities are supposed to have many faculty members with medical exper-tise, 30% faculty members at non-smoking facilities and 40% at smoking facilities did not properly understand their universi- ties’ anti-smoking classifications. In addition, even at non-smoking facilities, where on-campus smoking is supposedly prohibited, second-hand smoke existed too.

抄録全体を表示