詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "アムシャ・スプンタ"
7件中 1-7の結果を表示しています
  • 蓮池 利隆
    印度學佛教學研究
    1994年 43 巻 1 号 313-311
    発行日: 1994/12/20
    公開日: 2010/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 岡田 明憲
    オリエント
    1996年 39 巻 1 号 85-99
    発行日: 1996/09/30
    公開日: 2010/03/12
    ジャーナル フリー
    A variety of goddesses appear in the Zoroastrian pantheon. Among them, three goddesses are especially significant -Armaiti, Aši, and Anahita.
    Armaiti is a member of the Ameša Spentas and is ranked among the highest order of goddesses. Aši is closely connected with the concept of Aša, the core of the thought of Zoroaster himself. In Yašt it is recorded that Aši was the love of Zoroaster. Anahita, apparently influenced by the cult of Mesopotamian Mother Goddess, became the most popular object of Iranian faith.
    The three goddesses have separate origins and are theologicaly distinct. Nonetheless, under the influence of Indo-Iranian folk beliefs, all these goddesses have been viewed as the Earth Mother and as the complements to deities of the sky. Ahura Mazda and Armaiti were regarded as the parents of Gaya Maretan, or the primeval man. Mi∂ra and Anahita formed a pair. Aši was closely associated with Sraoša. These models parallel the dual divinities-Dyavaprthivi-of Rg Veda.
  • 岡田 明憲
    オリエント
    1985年 28 巻 2 号 66-77
    発行日: 1985年
    公開日: 2010/03/12
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 山本 由美子
    史学雑誌
    1985年 94 巻 9 号 1421-1449,1548
    発行日: 1985/09/20
    公開日: 2017/11/29
    ジャーナル フリー
    The Zoroastrianism is based on the dualism of Good and Evil, which devides everything into two opposing groups. One peculiar character of the Zoroastrian religious life has attracted many observers' attention in history. That is their hostile attitude towards some kinds of animals called xrafstras, such as serpents, scorpions, beasts of prey, insects and worms. Most people in the world would not like these creatures. But the Zoroastrians not only detest or kill these creatures, but also they consider the killing them to be meritorious acts, though the death is treated to belong to the Evil Spirit. The main purpose of this article is examining how xrafstras have been understood in history, what are xrafstras and why they are considered to be xrafstras. The natures of xrafstras are as belows ; first they are injurious to the human beings and the cattle. Second they are harmful to the corn. Third they have ugly and abominable shapes. Fourth they are related to the impurity, fifth they eat unclean food, and sixth they like darkness and have nocturnal natures. Lastly they bring in impurity to the pure creation of Ahura Mazda, such as water and earth. All xrafstras have one or a few of these natures. Through examining the natures of xrafstras, it became evident that the Zoroastrian attitude towards xrafstras reflects the very core of the Zoroastrian cosmology and theology.
  • 岡田 明憲
    オリエント
    1990年 33 巻 1 号 162-168
    発行日: 1990/09/30
    公開日: 2010/03/12
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 矢島 文夫
    オリエント
    1977年 20 巻 1 号 191-204
    発行日: 1977/09/30
    公開日: 2010/03/12
    ジャーナル フリー
  • ペルシア帝国における「王の法」
    佐藤 進
    オリエント
    1985年 28 巻 2 号 1-16
    発行日: 1985年
    公開日: 2010/03/12
    ジャーナル フリー
    Darius I was the first king who ruled over the world under a unified law; he did it by data. It is remarkable that data is mentioned in all the Achaemenid inscriptions (DB, DNa, DSe, XPh) which refer to reestablishment of the order of empire. data (<da- ‘set, make, create’) is the law ‘set’ by Ahuramazda to maintain the order restored from the chaos of draoga (‘the Lie’). This conception is old Iranian and we find a parallel in the Avesta (the Gathas). In the royal inscriptions data appears two-sided: ‘my data’ is coercive, while ‘data which Ahuramazda has set down’ is gracious. Babylonian and Aramaic sources show that there is a double system of laws in the empire, and that the king's law is superior to local laws, yet not applied to intracommunal matters of the population. Introduction of an imperial law-code by Darius is questioned under such conditions as co-existence of different laws in conquered lands on one hand, an early stage of legal development among the ruling class (e. g. a legal conception of religio-ethical character, legistration in a way of administrative decision, etc.) on the other hand. Persian kings prefer to permit the status quo, to order codification of local laws, and to settle matters necessary for keeping the imperial peace as occasion arises. Thus, data, always in the singular, represents not only a collective of king's decisions or ‘the law of the Medes and the Persians, which is not to be altered’ (Daniel 6: 9), i. d. what king's decisions have been formalized by a given procedure, but a legal principle of divine origin that gives ground for king's decision.
feedback
Top