詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "ゲオルギー・マレンコフ"
4件中 1-4の結果を表示しています
  • 下斗米 伸夫
    ロシア史研究
    2019年 103 巻 96-103
    発行日: 2019/07/30
    公開日: 2024/03/23
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 麻田 雅文
    アジア研究
    2015年 61 巻 1 号 5-23
    発行日: 2015/05/24
    公開日: 2015/06/04
    ジャーナル フリー
    On February 14, 1950, during Mao Zedong’s visit to Moscow, China and the Soviet Union signed the Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship, Alliance, and Mutual Assistance. The USSR agreed to transfer all Soviet rights and property connected with the Chinese Changchun Railway (hereinafter, CCR) to China. In addition, The Russians agreed to transfer the CCR gratis to China by the end of 1952, to withdraw Soviet forces from Port Arthur and transfer facilities there to China after conclusion of a peace treaty with Japan, or not later than the end of 1952.
    After Stalin’s death in 1953, Mao in 1958, stated, “We wanted the CCR but he [Stalin] wouldn’t return it. However, one can pull the meat out of the tiger’s mouth after all.” What was the meaning of Mao’s ‘tiger – meat’ metaphor?
    In brief, Stalin wanted the management of the CCR to be under Soviet control for as long as possible and was hesitant to negotiate its return in 1949. Mao on the other hand, wanted the rights for CCR’s joint operation since its creation.
    Despite these issues, the Chinese were successful in securing the return of the CCR in December 1952. There were two reasons for their success. First, the business conditions of the CCR were not favorable for Russia. The Soviet manager of the CCR, Kovalev, reported this problem to Stalin in January 1950, a month before the signing of the Sino-Soviet Treaty. According to him, the CCR was a burden to the national economy of the USSR. It is logical to surmise that Stalin accepted his opinion when agreeing to return the CCR in 1950.
    The second reason concerned the bargaining of the railway construction between China and the USSR. In August and September of 1952, a PRC delegation led by Chinese Prime Minister Zhou Enlai visited Moscow for negotiations with Kremlin leaders. In the negotiations, Zhou accepted Stalin’s demand to construct a railway between Mongolia and the North of China using Chinese laborers. The railway provided a direct link to Beijing for Russians. While Zhou was agreeable during the negotiations, the Chinese were disappointed with the agreement. The Chinese had wanted to construct the Lanzhou–Xinjiang railway; however, Zhou delayed its construction at Stalin’s request.
    Finally, China and the USSR agreed to transfer the CCR in 1952. The returning ceremony of the CCR at the end of 1952 in Harbin became a symbolic event for the Soviet-Chinese alliance in the 1950s.
  • 湯浅 成大
    アメリカ研究
    1992年 1992 巻 26 号 201-224
    発行日: 1992/03/25
    公開日: 2010/10/28
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 有澤 雄毅
    アジア経済
    2025年 66 巻 2 号 28-56
    発行日: 2025/06/15
    公開日: 2025/06/30
    ジャーナル フリー HTML

    本稿は,中華人民共和国で制定された初めての憲法である1954年憲法の制定過程の分析を通じて,中国共産党の政治体制構想を考察した。54年憲法制定過程の代表的研究である[韓 2014]は,同憲法制定会議参加者の政治体制に関する議論が如何にその後の政治過程に影響を及ぼしたのかが不明瞭であった。そこで本稿では,同研究を引用しつつ,54年憲法に関する新資料などを利用して同憲法の制定過程を分析した。その結果, 54年憲法制定過程での政治体制構想をめぐる中共指導部,ソ共指導部,民主党派の角逐は,相互不信感を増幅させただけでなく,根本的に思考が相容れないという現実を再認識させた点で象徴的な出来事となったであろうことがわかった。さらに指摘するならば,このような相互不信感は,中共指導部が民主党派に反右派闘争を,またソ共指導部とその後の対立を引き起こす遠因になったとも理解できるだろう。

feedback
Top