詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "サンヤー・タンマサック"
3件中 1-3の結果を表示しています
  • 矢野 秀武
    東南アジア -歴史と文化-
    2015年 2015 巻 44 号 203-207
    発行日: 2015年
    公開日: 2017/06/01
    ジャーナル フリー
  • ―1949年憲法と1997年憲法の比較を中心に―
    外山 文子
    年報タイ研究
    2023年 23 巻 1 号 97-111
    発行日: 2023年
    公開日: 2024/01/16
    ジャーナル フリー

    This study examines the meaning of “the Democratic Regime of Government with the King as Head of State” by comparing between the 1949 and 1997 constitutions. One of the central concepts that form Thai politics is rabop prachathipatai an mi phramahakasat song pen pramuk, that is, Democracy with the King as Head of State (DKHS). Thai constitutions have been stipulating that Thailand is governed by a democratic system, and the king is the head of state. However, its exact wording has changed several times since the 1949 Constitution. The current expression of DKHS has been established since the 1991 Constitution.

    DKHS has a long history of more than half a century as a constitutional and legal term; however, its meaning remains not clear. Historian Saichon Sattayanurak interpreted DKHS as the idea that when a political crisis arises, the king intervenes to resolve political disputes. Although it is a view with a certain degree of persuasive power, the myth that the king can intervene in a crisis and can attempt mediation has been completed after the bloody incident in May 1992. In contrast, the original wording of the DKHS first appeared in the 1949 Constitution.

    This study hypothesizes that the meaning of DKHS has been changing along with changes in actual politics and elucidates changes in the meaning of the DKHS by comparing the drafting minutes of the 1949 Constitution, in which DKHS first appeared, and the 1997 Constitution, which was enacted after the 1992 Bloodshed. As a result of the examination in this paper, it became clear that at the time of the 1949 constitution, the DKHS was a means for the royalists to win the power struggle against the army and maintain the monarchy, however the 1997 Constitution, promulgated in an era of democratization, made it clear that the objects DKHS would control were the people and democracy to preserve the monarchy. Therefore, the meaning of DKHS has clearly changed along with changes in the political power struggle of the times.

  • プッタタート比丘の思想
    伊藤 友美
    東南アジア -歴史と文化-
    1997年 1997 巻 26 号 113-136
    発行日: 1997/06/01
    公開日: 2010/02/25
    ジャーナル フリー
    This essay examines the religious significance of Buddhadasa Bhikkhu's (1906-1993) thoughts in contemporary Thai Buddhism. He advocated the understanding and practice of “Dhamma”, instead of the unconscious, routine practices of conventional Buddhism, to annihilate the internal sufferings. His teachings marked an epoch in Thai society.
    Buddhadasa's trials had historical precedings in the last century. The Thammayut Movement headed by Prince Mongkut had been critical of the ‘superstitious’ beliefs and the lack of knowledge about Buddhist philosophy since the early nineteenth century. His son and successor, Prince Patriarch Wachirayan Warorot continued this movement to promote scriptural knowledge. The authorized understandings of Buddhist doctrine had been diffused through the educational hierarchy of the centralized national sangha by the beginning of this century.
    Along with this expansion of Buddhist education, questions on the unnatural religious discourses like heaven and hell in the next life were often discussed with suspicion among intellectuals in 1930s. All of three viewpoints on the next life, either positive, negative or neutral, agreed that the moral order of social life in this world would suffer if the actual existence of the next world is denied. It was Buddhadasa who made a break-through on the question of morality and mysterious religious discourses by teaching “Dhamma”: the essence of Buddhism.
    Buddhadasa started to search for the “Dhamma” of Buddhism, instead of conventional “practical religion” of Thai Buddhism, in Thailand's national Buddhist education which had been prepared by Wachirayan. First, Buddhadasa tried to learn essential Buddhism in scriptural orthodoxy, but he came to its dead end. He found his way out in the “practice” of Dhamma through meditation practice and Zen style of everyday life. He revived meditation practice in the modern world as a means of capturing the insight necessary to extinguish internal sufferings; rather than a means of cultivating magical power as traditional meditation monks had practiced. Also, he taught to look within oneself by introducing Zen Buddhism to the Theravada Buddhists who were more concerned with merit-making practice to achieve better rebirth. Now his teachings play an active role in the mission of Buddhism to the born Buddhists of Thailand, rather than to the non-Buddhists of foreign countries.
    In Buddhadasa's thoughts, the “Dhamma” of Buddhism which is Buddhism for extinguishing one's internal sufferings, was essential. On the perceptual level, Buddhadasa denied earthly expectations of religious practice, such as a wish for heaven and a fear for hell, which prevented one's awareness of internal sufferings. He preached that the unnatural religious discourses about subjects like hell, the hungry ghost and even the nibbana, were all psychological phenomena within the self of individuals living in this world, whose existence was the only tangible reality for the modern intellectuals. On the practical level, he invited people to achieve emptiness of mind by staying away from attachment, either through meditation practice or in conscious everyday life. He believed that it was the practice of internal emptiness that sustained the moral order in this world, instead of behavior based on the religious reward.
    Buddhadasa's disciples and followers remarked that they have been attracted to Buddhadasa's teaching on practice of Dhamma, rather than his rational, demythologized interpretations of unscientific religious discourses. This suggests that the Buddhadasa's efforts to bring the internal practice of “Dhamma” to people's attention, was significant for the contemporary Thai Buddhists.
feedback
Top