詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "サームプラヤー"
2件中 1-2の結果を表示しています
  • KLAYSIKAEW Krairerk, 古屋 秀樹
    土木学会論文集D3(土木計画学)
    2014年 70 巻 5 号 I_323-I_333
    発行日: 2014年
    公開日: 2015/05/18
    ジャーナル フリー
    タイ有数の観光地であるアユタヤは,1991年に世界文化遺産に登録されて,世界中から多くの観光客が訪れ,独自の観光資源は伝統文化や古都の遺跡として諸国の観光客に注目されている.さらなる観光地としての発展と観光振興のために,現地でのアンケート調査を踏まえた来訪者の行動特性や評価の実態把握を本研究の目的とする.2011年3月に回収された409サンプルを対象に偏相関係数分析,層別回帰分析を用いて居住地別評価特性を把握した.その結果は,日本人の占める割合が大きいこと,居住地ごとの利用交通機関や評価に違いがあることが明らかとなった.さらに,今回の回収されたデータは,アジア・オセアニアから除く日本人の占める割合が多いため,日本人はアジア・オセアニア居住地に含めないで,明らかにすることとした.
  • ──ダムロン親王の役割に着目して──
    日向 伸介
    東南アジア -歴史と文化-
    2012年 2012 巻 41 号 30-60
    発行日: 2012年
    公開日: 2016/12/14
    ジャーナル フリー

    This essay clarifies how Prince Damrong Rachanuphap, who is widely known as the first Minister of the Interior and the ‘father of Thai History,’ displayed and instilled the value of ‘Thainess’ at the Bangkok National Museum during the reign of King Rama VII(1925−1935).

    Soon after the beginning of the reign, the museum was quickly transformed from a ‘general’ museum to a ‘historical and/or archaeological’ museum under the direction of Prince Damrong and was officially re-opened as the ‘Bangkok Museum’ in 1926. At that time, a number of antiquities were transferred to the Bangkok Museum, mainly from provincial museums, the Ministry of the Interior and the private palace of Prince Damrong himself. Accordingly, the museum collection became more clearly characterized as representing Siamese state and territory. In addition, artifacts were displayed in a way that emphasized the unique aspects of ‘Thais’ in contrast to ‘Khmers.’ The efforts to distinguish both cultural aspects are clearly recognized in Prince Damrong’s writings, including A Journey to Angkor Wat(1924)and A History of Siamese Stupas(1926).

    Meanwhile, Prince Damrong attempted to utilize the museum as a part of school training beginning in 1928. He made lectures in front of visiting teachers, and according to his speech draft preserved at the National Archives of Thailand, one of the purposes of this museum education was to ‘make students love their country.’ He defined museum objects as ‘heritage’ from Thai ancestors who had protected the country, and encouraged the audience to leave behind their own ‘heritage’ to descendants. Likewise he stressed the significant role that the Chakri Dynasty and its Kings played in maintaining independence from the Burmese. It can be summarized that his ‘patriotism’ is an ideology that demands the unity of Thais under Royal governance.

    Thus, the Bangkok National Museum during the reign of King Rama VII was transformed into an institution that conveys the value of ‘Thainess’ in terms of its cultural and ideological dimensions.

feedback
Top