詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "マリー・ド・メディシス"
11件中 1-11の結果を表示しています
  • 山崎 正史
    都市計画論文集
    2000年 35 巻 49-54
    発行日: 2000/10/25
    公開日: 2018/02/01
    ジャーナル オープンアクセス
    The purpose of this article are to trace up the history of urban design in Florence of Renaissance era, to see how this urban design was introduced to Paris, and to depict the beginning of urban design in Paris. An axis, which connected SS. Annunziata-Santa Maria del Fore-Palazzo Vecchio-Palazzo Uffici, was also established there. Marie de Medicis, a grand daughter of Casimo 1, made the Palais du Luxembourg and the Cours de la Reine introducing those Italian designs to Paris. Colbert, Le-Notre and the Commisiion des Artistes were the successors of her design. They made the axis and urban designs of Avenue des Champs-Eysees and Avenue de Observatoire, making use of Marie's heritages.
  • 大谷 卓史
    情報管理
    2013年 56 巻 6 号 389-392
    発行日: 2013/09/01
    公開日: 2013/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー HTML
  • 阿河 雄二郎
    社会経済史学
    1993年 59 巻 1 号 88-116,199
    発行日: 1993/05/25
    公開日: 2017/07/01
    ジャーナル オープンアクセス
    Il est generalement soutenu que, d'une part, la noblesse souffrit de grands dommages a cause de la crise grave de la societe aux XVIe et XVIIe siecles, et d'autre part, le pouvoir royal est consolide par le soutien de la classe ascendante, c'est-a-dire, la bourgeoisie. Mais, de nos jours, il est necessaire de reviser cette theorie en examinant des travaux recents sur la noblesse, parce que la noblesse ne decline pas toujours et le systeme noviliaire est tenace et pour la royaute il est plutot preferable de le maintenir. Dans cet article, nous essayons d'eclaircir la relation entre le pouvoir royal et la noblesse au XVIIe siecle en etudiant la carriere et la fortune de la "noblesse politique". Nous remarquons par la quelques points comme conclusion. D'abord, commele pouboir royal cree arbitrairement les titres nobiliaires en recompense des services rendus au roi, la hierarchie sociale se forme conformement a la "grace royale" et au pouvoir public qu'on peut tenir. Le role de la monarchie absolue, par consequent, consiste a stabiliser et a fixer l'ordre social en equilibrant l'ancien et le vouveau systemes de valeurs. En second lieu, le pouvoir royal ne reussit cependant pas toujours a la tentative de la fixation de la societe. Ou plutot, il ne poursuit pas serieusement le controle de la noblesse et la "recherche de noblesse". A cet egard, nous pensons que la politique royale envers la noblesse est plus souple et elastique. Car, c'est le pouvoir royal qui fait naitre les elites politiques stables, en reconnaissant la mobilite sociale dans une certaine mesure, et en accelerant la fusion et la solidalite entre la noblesse traditionnelle et l'anobli. Au XVIIe siecle, sous la direction royale, la noblesse cesse d'etre une classe autonome et se transforme en aristocrates ou privilegies.
  • 17世紀パリの邸宅の空間構成の変化に関する考察
    片山 勢津子
    日本建築学会計画系論文集
    2010年 75 巻 650 号 927-933
    発行日: 2010/04/30
    公開日: 2010/06/14
    ジャーナル フリー
    This study is to show the spacial characteristics by restoring the plan of Hôtel de Rambouillet in Paris, and to consider the elements which caused the development of hôtel design.
    The restoration is made according to the imprints of the Rambouillet's plan which remain in the two study plans of Louis Le Vau, new materials. And I make the forms of the site and buildings clear. As a result, Hôtel de Rambouillet proves to have been planned in view of how visitors move and look. Not a few of Rambouillet's devices are found in the later hôtels.
  • 片山 勢津子
    日本建築学会計画系論文集
    2001年 66 巻 548 号 271-276
    発行日: 2001/10/30
    公開日: 2017/02/04
    ジャーナル フリー
    In the 17^<th> century salons of h6tels, the residences of upper classes, were prevalent in Paris. The prevalence of salons seems to have contributed to the progress of interior design and architectural composition of hotels. Referring to Louis Savot's L'ARCHITECTURE FRANCOISE DBS BASTIMENTS PARTICULIERS, this study is to make clear the outline of residences and consider the interior and architectural composition of hotels in that age. His concrete description gives us to understand that there was a principle of building his own house according to his social position, though there were needs for enrichment of interior space.
  • 「劇的バレエ」は劇的か
    譲原 晶子
    美学
    2016年 67 巻 1 号 97-
    発行日: 2016年
    公開日: 2017/07/18
    ジャーナル オープンアクセス
    Jean-George Noverre, a godfather of action ballet, describes his earlier pieces with the discussion of ballet poetics in his book. Though action ballet is sometimes called “dramatic ballet,” his pieces don’t seem necessarily dramatic, judging from their synopses. This article puts Noverre’s theory and practice of ballet in perspective of those of ballet genres before the time of action ballet, namely, ballet de cour, opera- ballet and etc., and discusses in what meaning his pieces were “dramatic”. The seventeenth-century ballet theorists, Ménéstrier among others, remark that the ballet should be a mute comedy; it should be composed of diverse elements. To associate all the elements with the subject of work, Ménéstrier, who emphasized the diversity of ballet, advocated the rule of unité de dessein for his ballet poetics, abandoning the dramatic rule of unité de action -- these two unités are by their natures incompatible with each other. This article shows that the significance of the diversity in ballet poetics had been virtually diminished by the time of Cahusac, who emphasized rather dramatic aspects of ballet and suggested the idea of grande action, and that Noverre tried to realize this idea by adapting plots of opera-ballet with poor intrigue.
  • 譲原 晶子
    美学
    2014年 65 巻 1 号 121-132
    発行日: 2014/06/30
    公開日: 2017/05/22
    ジャーナル フリー
    Des ballets anciens et modernes selon les regies du theatre (1682) by Claude-Francois Menestrier is known as one of the most important theoretical books on ballet. Being referred to by Cahusac who wrote the articles "Ballet" and "Danse" in Diderot's Encyclopedie, the book on ballet du cour seems to have had significant influence also on the 18th-century ballet reforms. This paper compares this book with Lettres sur la danse, et sur les ballets (1760) by Jean-George Noverre, showing that Noverre also wrote his Lettres on the basis of this book on ballet du cour. In the chapter 7 in Lettres, in which the rules of ballet are discussed, Noverre cites some lines from classical literature by Saint Augustine, Plutarch and Aristotle, from which Menestrier also quoted the same passages, (and actually Noverre seems to have borrowed these from Menestrier), but their arguments developed from these same classic quotes are completely different. By focusing the traits in common and difference in their arguments, this paper tries to reinterpret Noverre's statements in Lettres, revealing that this book relies on Menestrier's theory of ballet poetics.
  • ノヴェールからブラジスへ
    清水 英夫
    舞踊學
    2010年 2010 巻 33 号 64-72
    発行日: 2010年
    公開日: 2018/07/31
    ジャーナル オープンアクセス
  • 川野 惠子
    西洋比較演劇研究
    2016年 15 巻 1 号 1-18
    発行日: 2016年
    公開日: 2016/04/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    This paper examines the transition of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries’ theories of ballet as drama in France, particularly those of C.-F. Ménestrier (1682), L. de Cahusac (1754), and J. -G. Noverre (1760). Ménestrier was one of the first theorists on ballet as drama in early modern France. He defined “unité de dessein” as rules specific to ballet for their construction to differentiate an authoritative rule in the era of “unité d'action”. In “unité de dessein”, the ballet is composed by conducting the subject; in other words, enumerating all elements of the subject. Therefore, a ballet could contain some actions and present diverse places and times. Meanwhile, describing the history of dance, Cahusac recognized that ballet changed in Quinault’s opera, as it was incorporated into the principal action of the opera. That is, Cahusac introduced the idea of “action” into ballet. However, the important point is, while in the tradition of “unité d'action” the unity lies in the consistency in creating works, the action in Cahusac’s definition is intended for the unity of audience’s interest. He insisted that if ballet sustained the audience’s interest by incorporating itself into the principal action, the audience’s soul could be touched. Noverre agreed with the concept of action as unity of the audience’s interest; however, he emphasized the unity of a scene, which is more momentary than the successive action in Cahusac’s definition. Noverre strongly criticized allegoric costumes or narrative monologues in ballet because they destroy the optical unity of the scene. Rather, he believed that the scene should consist of physical expressions, which imitate the passion of the character. In that case, the scene could achieve optical unity, and the content expressed by the scene could be read naturally and immediately by the audience. Based on the above, it can be said that although the theories of ballet as drama had already begun to be discussed by Ménestrier, who was succeeded by Cahusac and Noverre, the important aspects of the unity of ballet changed between the seventeenth and eighteenth century. The origin of unity of ballet as drama in Ménestrier’s definition is the author who conducts the subject, and the work itself contains some actions and diverse places and times. On the other hand, Cahusac and Noverre agreed upon the concept of action aiming for the unity of audience’s interest. That is, the principle of unity shifts from author to audience. Particularly, Noverre’s concept of action is important in ballet as drama because the dance is not the only medium of expression. Rather, the allegoric costumes or narrative monologues play an important role in the narrative. However, Noverre pursued action as the unity of a scene for the audience’s interest, and created a scene expressed by physical expressions and therefore understood immediately and naturally by the audience. Thus, the story of ballet as drama began to be told by physical expression, and ballet in its current form was born.
  • 金山 弘昌
    日本橋学館大学紀要
    2005年 4 巻 29-51
    発行日: 2005/03/30
    公開日: 2018/02/07
    ジャーナル フリー
    上演芸術史において,フィレンツェのメディチ家宮廷がもつ重要性については議論の余地がないであろう。まさにこの宮廷において,ヤーコポ・ペーリによる史上初の音楽劇(オペラ)が上演され,ブオンタレンティ設計の有名なメディチ劇場が開設されたのである。大公国の政治経済的衰退が明らかな17世紀においてさえも,この宮廷で催される祝祭と上演物は西欧の他の諸宮廷にとっての模範であり続けた。本論文では,17世紀前半,より厳密には,いずれも婚礼祝祭の催された1608年と1661年の間の時期において,メディチ家宮廷で用いられた劇場システムについて考察したい。同宮廷では,とりわけさまざまな上演物が催される祝祭においては,上演物自体の類型を考慮しつつ,さまざまな類型の劇場と劇場的場が用いられた。メディチ家が催した祝祭,とりわけ婚礼祝祭の検証を通じて,同宮廷では劇場と劇場的場が概ね二つの類型に分類されていたと推定できる。一つはトルネオ(騎士試合)用の野外劇場であり,もうひとつは演劇と音楽劇の上演のための室内劇場,近代的な意味での文字通りの劇場である。野外劇場に関しては,たとえその形式が変化したとはいえ,中世に起源をもつ「囲われた広場」の伝統が,とりわけその機能において存続していた。しかし演劇と音楽劇のための室内劇場については,宮廷は恒常的に機能する劇場を生みだすことに失敗し,各種の劇場的場の応急的な使用に依存し続けたということを銘記せねばならない。この傾向はとりわけ1630年代のメディチ劇場の解体以後に顕著である。ピッティ宮中庭の使用などさまざまな提案がなされたものの,有効な方策とはいえなかった。それ故に,1661年の婚礼祝祭においては,アッカデミア・デリ・インモービリのペルゴラ劇場が音楽劇の上演に充てられたのである。かくして上演の場の問題は,貴族たちが所有するほとんど私的かつ市民的な劇場を用いて宮廷外で上演物を催すというかたちで解決されたのである。
  • 清水 英夫
    舞踊學
    2008年 2008 巻 31 号 34-47
    発行日: 2008年
    公開日: 2010/04/30
    ジャーナル フリー
    This paper intends to reappreciate Gasparo Angiolini (1731-1803)'s view of ballet d'action comparing with Jean=Georges Noverre. Close reading of his letters (Lettere di Gasparo Angiolini à Monsieur Noverre sopra i balli pantomimi (1773)) shows that Angiolini's view on the connection of each scene is quite clear; the plot should be the conduct principle. Angiolini thinks that the story should be told only by the means of ‘pas’, the language of ballet, then the libretto is not necessary for its representation. On this point, Angiolini's claim on the narrativity of ballet seems to be much more thorough than that of Noverre. Yet in pursuance of ballet d'action, Angiolini recognizes the ambiguity of the meaning of ballet language compared with spoken language. He thinks ballet language as a kind of sign, and values the ambiguity as its uniqueness. This recognition leads him to the valuation of ‘pas’ as movement itself, and Noverre also shares this idea; it seems to be quite close to our idea of so-called ‘pure dance’. In these senses, Angiolini's view provides us the right point of reference for reconsidering the assertion of ballet d'action, and still holds the significance in the history of ballet.
feedback
Top