詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "万里小路家"
26件中 1-20の結果を表示しています
  • 久水 俊和
    史学雑誌
    2014年 123 巻 4 号 599-606
    発行日: 2014/04/20
    公開日: 2017/07/31
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 室町公家衆と浄土宗
    西田 圓我
    印度學佛教學研究
    1978年 27 巻 1 号 350-355
    発行日: 1978/12/31
    公開日: 2010/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 玉山 成元
    印度學佛教學研究
    1972年 21 巻 1 号 68-73
    発行日: 1972/12/31
    公開日: 2010/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 山家 浩樹
    史学雑誌
    1987年 96 巻 10 号 1671-
    発行日: 1987/10/20
    公開日: 2017/11/29
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 中島 圭一
    史学雑誌
    1992年 101 巻 3 号 367-386,491-49
    発行日: 1992/03/20
    公開日: 2017/11/29
    ジャーナル フリー
    Au moyen age, le recouvrement des creances etait peu sur, ce qui causait beaucoup de risques dans les affaires des usuriers. Neanmoins, au debut du quatorzieme siecle, il y avait plus de 300 doso a Kyoto. Comment pouvait-il se trouver autant de doso dans une ville de seulement 80000 ou 100000 habitants au plus? Les doso a Kyoto ont souvent obtenu le poste de collecteur d'impots d'un domaine. Habituellement, ils payaient ces impots d'avance, au moment de leur designation, puis les recuperaient sur la levee du domaine. En consequence, de nos jours, on assimile cela a un emprunt des seigneurs. Mais pour que les doso aient pu reussir a recuperer leur argent, il leur a fallu des connaissances et des experiences sur l'administration des domaines et sur la collecte des impots, les differentes techniques des usuriers. Donc, on ne peut pas traiter les entreprises de la perception des impots comme les prets ordinaires. Les doso etaient usuriers, mais aussi entrepreneurs de la levee des impots. A l'origine, le doso etait un simple usurier, appele kashiage (借上). La plupart des gens devenus kashiage avaient ete des serviteurs de la classe inferieure des nobles, des pretres bouddhistes ou shintoistes de rang inferieur, qui ont eu la chance d'avoir les fonds necessaires malgre leur condition peu elevee, au cours de la levee des impots de domaines sur l'ordre de leur maitre ou de leur temple. Ces usuriers etaient deja habiles dans l'administration d'un domaine et dans la collecte des impots au commencement de leurs affaires. Apres la guerre de Jokyu (承久の乱), beaucoup de fiefs ont ete attribues aux jitogokenin (地頭御家人). Pour gouverner sans embarras leurs terres eloignees, ces seigneurs non residents ont du etre aides par les kashiage. En outre, pour administrer leur terre, les jitogokenin ont commence a mandater un specialiste ou bien quelqu'un au courant des affaires de la region des la fin du treizieme siecle. C'etait une methode d'administration, convenante aux domaines ou l'ichienryo-ka (一円領化) est perfectionne. Surtout, ceux qui habitaient a Kyoto et qui ont eu besoin d'argent dans la vie urbaine, donnaient souvent mandat aux kashiage qui connaissaient les affaires et qui avaient assez de ressources pour faire des avances d'impots. Ainsi, les kashiage a Kyoto sont devenus entrepreneurs de la perception des impots, et on ne pouvait plus definir entierement leurs affaires par le mot "kashiage (=usurier) ". Alors, pour les designer eux qui sont remarquables surtout par leurs richesses, le mot "doso (=entrepot)" qui symbolise la fortune est apparu et s'est propage. Puis pendant l'epoque des Dynasties du nord et du sud, avec la marche d' ichienryo-ka des domaines dans tout le pays, les doso ont trouve de nouveaux clients et une solide situation comme entrepreneurs.
  • 藤井 崇
    史学雑誌
    2011年 120 巻 5 号 716-720
    発行日: 2011/05/20
    公開日: 2017/12/01
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 豊田 武
    社会経済史学
    1948年 15 巻 1 号 67-99
    発行日: 1948/10/30
    公開日: 2017/09/24
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 中野 正明
    印度學佛教學研究
    1983年 32 巻 1 号 325-327
    発行日: 1983/12/25
    公開日: 2010/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 石井 良助
    法制史研究
    1983年 1983 巻 33 号 227-230
    発行日: 1984/03/30
    公開日: 2009/11/16
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 中世文学
    1973年 18 巻 97-101
    発行日: 1973年
    公開日: 2018/02/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 林 大樹
    論集きんせい
    2018年 40 巻 1-60
    発行日: 2018年
    公開日: 2025/08/01
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 奧野 高廣
    社会経済史学
    1935年 5 巻 9 号 985-1040
    発行日: 1935/12/15
    公開日: 2017/09/25
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 太田 靜六
    日本建築學會論文集
    1950年 41 巻 114-119
    発行日: 1950/08/20
    公開日: 2017/12/04
    ジャーナル フリー
    Generally speaking, the palace during the Heike Period is classified to two systems, one system is great and large palace and the other is new and smaller style, whose plan is simplified for practical use. In this study, the author introduced some typical and useful houses, and explained their special charactres.
  • 鈴木 成元
    印度學佛教學研究
    1965年 14 巻 1 号 66-73
    発行日: 1965/12/25
    公開日: 2010/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 的場 匠平
    史学雑誌
    2014年 123 巻 9 号 1613-1640
    発行日: 2014/09/20
    公開日: 2017/07/31
    ジャーナル フリー
    The study of the development of funereal rites among Japan's aristocracy from antiquity through late premodern times has not only been made possible by the availability of ample historiographic sources, but is also helpful in examining both the peculiar and universal aspects of imperial funereal rites in late premodern times. That being said, no serious attempt has been made yet to trace the process of aristocratic funerals and burials throughout Japan's premodern history. The present article is intended to shed light upon the late premodern transformation of Japanese funereal rites in both substance and perception, using the case of closed funerals (misso 密葬) among the aristocracy of that time. The closed funeral (hereafter misso) was the rite of secretly transporting the body of the deceased to be either buried or cremated prior to the official funeral to be held several days later, and was also a method of avoiding the putrefaction of the corpse in the case of long delays in scheduling the official funeral. The rite itself, which had already been in existence prior to the beginning of the 17th century, became universally known as "misso" by the mid-18th century. Rites similar to misso were often conducted during ancient and medieval times under the name of "heisei-no-gi" 平生之儀 (ordinary ceremony), the difference between the two being that heisei-no-gi was not conducted in secrecy or as an abridgement of the official funeral. Therefore, the transition from the popularity of heisei-no-gi in medieval times to the widespread diffusion of misso in late premodern Japan represents a change in the perception of funerals from a relatively unimportant ritual in medieval times to a ceremony arranged to befit the status of the deceased and carefully planned in advance to take place on the most auspicious day possible. In other words, funereal rites experienced a significant increase in social value. In the opinion of the author, this increase in social value was felt throughout all social classes and became the rationale for the lavishness of funerals among the common people of late premodern Japan, as well as the huge scale on which imperial funerals came to be conducted during the time.
  • 永井 規男
    日本建築学会論文報告集
    1967年 136 巻 42-47,50
    発行日: 1967/06/30
    公開日: 2017/08/22
    ジャーナル フリー
    This paper is made out according to architechtural articles of the diary of Sanetaka Sanjonishi (1455-1537), and aims to clarify various architectural productions of residences of the nobility of that age as well as to learn the basical structure. The Summary is as follows : (1) Constructive process of residence was divided into main work and fitting work. The terms of payment to the workmen for main work was contract wages system and for fittings daily wages system. These two ways originates in the process of planning; the main work was advanced according to 'sashizu' (a simple ground plan) and the fitting work under the order's indication in detail. (2) Workmen and orders were bound by family-like relationship. This kind of access relationship is humanic and rather recent than the former dominate-subordinate relationship. (3) The organization of workmen consisted basically of family unit. Some of them had the official social position as the Shogunate workmen (Government workmen), and at the same time boud private relationship of this kind of family-like relationship with specially fixed person. (4) The wage of workmen was 110 (one-hundred-ten) mon, and this was the standard amount of that days in Kyoto. (5) Timbers were mainly bought from timber-dealers, but some part of them were supplied by the accommodation among the nobilities by a habitual mutual aid.
  • 晩生大豆の普及が社会に与えた影響に関する一視点
    渡邊 太祐
    史学雑誌
    2024年 133 巻 2 号 55-67
    発行日: 2024年
    公開日: 2025/02/20
    ジャーナル フリー
    本稿は、中世における畠地二毛作のなかでも一般的な組み合わせとして考えられている麦・大豆の二毛作が成立する前提条件となった晩生大豆について検討したものである。麦の後作に大豆を栽培するためには、晩生品種の大豆(夏蒔き秋収穫)の登場が必要だった。古代までは春蒔き夏収穫の早生品種が栽培されていたが、十四世紀ごろより晩生大豆の普及が見られるようになる。文献史料によって麦と晩生大豆による畠地二毛作を確認するとともに、二毛作を前提とする収取が開始されていたことも明らかにした。
     十四世紀から十五世紀にかけて、東アジアでは晩生大豆を多毛作体系に組み込んだ農法が普及していた。中国では明代中期ごろより華北地方で粟・麦・晩生大豆による二年三毛作が普及し始め、李氏朝鮮では麦・晩生大豆の二毛作が行なわれていた。日本の中世に一般化した麦・晩生大豆による畠地二毛作も、東アジアにおける農業技術の進展と軌を一にするものだったと考えられる。
     十三世紀ごろより、史料上で「夏畠」に麦が、「秋畠」に大豆等が課される事例が散見されるようになる。麦と晩生大豆による二毛作普及を前提として、同一の畠地から年二回の収取が行なわれた。晩生大豆の普及は、二毛作による生産力の向上をもたらすと共に収取制度の変化を通じて領主側にも増収をもたらしていたのではないかと考える。
    本稿は、従来の研究では実態が分かっていなかった麦・大豆による二毛作の実態と、麦・大豆の二毛作が普及したことで収取制度もそれに対応した形に変化したことを明らかにしたものである。今後の畠作研究に貢献する論考だと考えている。
  • 小沢 朝江
    日本建築学会計画系論文集
    2002年 67 巻 554 号 267-273
    発行日: 2002/04/30
    公開日: 2017/02/04
    ジャーナル フリー
    In this study, the outer gates of the Royal palace and the area called "Tsuiji-no-uchi" inside the gates on the pre-modern era are considered. As the six gates had been built before 1643 and the other three had been added before 1708,the area had been expanded down south. The area was recognised as the sacred place. Accordingly, the Bakufu bore the cost of the fences and the gates in order to landscape it. It was possible that before 1643 the area around the palace had been identified as the "Jinchu" which had been conceptualised since the medieval period.
  • 川本 慎自
    史学雑誌
    2003年 112 巻 1 号 59-75
    発行日: 2003/01/20
    公開日: 2017/12/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    In the late medieval period Japan, Zen temples expanded their shoen (estates) and contracted the management of estates of other temples and nobles.Up to this point, it has been a foregone conclusion that this was a result of individual Zen monks'skill in estate management.However, because estate management by Zen temples is seen extensively throughout the entire Zen Sect, it is essencial to consider not only the contribution of individual Zen monks but also the ways in which the Zen temple organizations participated in estate management.Thereupon, taking note of the "knowledge" transmitted among Zen priests within the Zen temples, the author of the article considers whether or not there was something included in this "knowledge" that was related to estate management skills, then the way in which this "knowledge" was comunicated by monks, and family how it was put into practice and applied to estate management.Unsho Ikkei雲章一慶, a priest of Tofukuji東福寺 temple, gave lectures regarding shingi(清規 regulations of the Zen Sect), and one of his disciples Togen Zuisen桃源瑞仙 recorded them in a book entitled Hajoshingi-sho百丈清規抄.In this work, there is description of shosu (荘主 overseers of Zen temples' estates), who were normally monks.This description is based on an actual case in which Tofukuji temple dismissed in 1444 the shosu of Kambara-go 上原郷 in Bicchu 備中.It shows the ways in which it was neccessary for the shosu to cooperate with shugo 守護 when undertaking estate management.Therefore, this is indicative of the fact that within the knowkedge transmitted among the Zen monks there was indeed something included that pertained toestate management.In those days there were many lectures on Confucial learning given at Zen temples, includings the lectures on Hajoshingi by Unsho Ikkei.In addition to Zen priests, court officials like Kiyohara Naritada 清原業忠, known as a master of Confucian learning, attended these lectures.As a result, they were able to exchange not only Confucian knowledge but also such practical knowledge as estate management skills.For ezample, the Zen monks who attended the Confucian lectures by Unsho Ikkei collaborated with Nakahara Yasutomi 中原康富, who was a court offical and a student of Kiyohara Naritada, in the administration of the latter's estate.The author concluded that Zen temples were able to ezpand their estate management activites because they had a system in which Zen priests learned practical knowledge was result of the interchange between the Zen monks and court officials.
  • 小風 真理子
    史学雑誌
    2004年 113 巻 8 号 1406-1427
    発行日: 2004/08/20
    公開日: 2017/12/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    The present article is intended to clarify the raison d'etre of envoys, or delegates, called Sanmon-shisetu, who were affiliated with the two Japanese medieval oligarchs (kenmon 権門), the Muromachi Bakufu and Enryakuji 延暦寺 Temple, utilizing the concrete example of the involvement of these envoys in a dispute that occurred during the Bun'an era (1444 - 49) over Enryakuji's revocation of Nanzenji 南禅寺 Temple's permit of passage necessary for the latter's boats to trade on Lake Biwa. The author examines the question of how these envoys realized the wishes and interests of Enryakuji vis-a-vis powers with opposing interests. To begin with, one assumption in proceeding with such an analysis is to discern if in fact Sanmon-shisetsu had the right to deliver and enforce transit permits for the tariff stations controlled by Enryakuji in Omi Province. The author discovers that these envoys did have that right for Enryakuji stations, but non-Enryakuji facilities were controlled by the Rokkaku 六角 and Kyogoku 京極 families in the areas they administered as provincial constables (shugo 守護) appointed by the Muromachi Bakufu. Secondly, concerning the origin and resolution of the Nanzenji Incident, the author turns to the subject of Enryakuji's economic interests and the groups of monks who profited from tariffs levied at the station at Sakamoto 坂本 and who revoked the transit permits out of protest over an exemption given to Nanzenji's first five hundred boatloads of goods to pass through the station. Playing the leading role in resolving the dispute was Goshoin 護正院 Temple, an influential Sanmon-shisetu in economic affairs within and outside of Enryakuji. Goshoin's success in negotiating a settlement (a promise by Nanzenji to pay all tariffs in addition to gratitude money) was due to its close involvement in the economic affairs of Enryakuji monks. One more important factor in the settlement was Enryakuji's firm belief that the Sanmon-shisetsu would express its demands to Nanzenji and protect its interests. Therefore, the author concludes that those appointed Sanmon-shisetsu by no means acted in accordance with the Bakafu's wishes in opposition to Enryakuji, but also contributed to the interests of the latter in certain cases. While serving two opposing powers, the Sanmon-shisetsu was extremely sensitive and flexible towards the demands of both, acting as an intermediary between the two and perceived by both as indispensable to their political activities.
feedback
Top