詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "中島航輝"
4件中 1-4の結果を表示しています
  • 加藤 道夫, 加藤 亜希子, 伊藤 珠里, 山本 佳奈, 中村 恵理
    日本口腔インプラント学会誌
    2016年 29 巻 2 号 131-135
    発行日: 2016/06/30
    公開日: 2016/08/10
    ジャーナル フリー

    With the advent of highly biocompatible titanium implants, implant therapy has been considered as a predictable dental treatment in recent years. However, there have been reports on poor prognosis of implant cases. Although most of these reports are related to peri-implantitis or paresthesia, there are some reports on titanium allergy cases. We have experienced one case of metal allergy ; this report presents a patient who developed oral lichen planus after implant placement.

    The patient was a 56-year-old female with no significant past medical or dental history. She came to our clinic in January 2012 with a chief complaint of a mobile right mandibular molar. The second molar was extracted due to a root fracture. Her pre-operative blood tests did not show any abnormality other than a slightly elevated cholesterol level. One implant was placed at the site in June. After the surgery, she started to complain of mild spontaneous pain on the bilateral posterior buccal mucosa. We decided to watch the condition and wait. Then we observed lacy white patches on both sides of the posterior buccal mucosa at the time of re-entry in September. In October, a provisional restoration was set in her mouth. Since the symptoms did not improve, a histopathological examination was performed in February 2013 and a definitive diagnosis of oral lichen planus was made.

    Even though the metal allergy was suspected as a cause of her oral lichen planus, it had been very difficult to diagnose her metal allergy before the implant surgery as there were already many metal restorations placed in her mouth. Therefore, we believe that it is necessary to consider the possibility of metal allergy before initiating implant therapy and it is advisable to add the metal allergy test to the set of pre-operative examinations such as systemic blood screening tests.

  • 高山 かおる, 横関 博雄, 松永 佳世子, 片山 一朗, 相場 節也, 池澤 善郎, 足立 厚子, 戸倉 新樹, 夏秋 優, 古川 福実, 矢上 晶子, 乾 重樹, 池澤 優子, 相原 道子
    日本皮膚科学会雑誌
    2020年 130 巻 4 号 523-567
    発行日: 2020/04/20
    公開日: 2020/04/20
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 中島 航輝
    口腔病学会雑誌
    2007年 74 巻 2 号 92-98
    発行日: 2007/06/30
    公開日: 2010/10/08
    ジャーナル フリー
    Recently, allergy to titanium has been reported. However, the patch test reagent for titanium is not standardized yet. The form and density of the patch test reagent for titanium was changed and examined in a group of normal subjects and a group with skin disease. The following conclusions were obtained.
    1. A reagent which was composed of pure titanium powder and vaseline was not preferable because its form was a stimulant.
    2. If the form of the titanium powder was not sharp even though it was not spherical, it did not cause a stimulated reaction.
    3. It is suggested that TiCl4 0.1% is preferable as a patch test reagent for titanium.
  • 岸部 麻里, 小神 順也, 松尾 梨沙, 井川 哲子, 菅野 恭子, 竹川 政範, 山本 明美
    日本皮膚科学会雑誌
    2021年 131 巻 12 号 2573-2582
    発行日: 2021/11/20
    公開日: 2021/11/22
    ジャーナル 認証あり

    掌蹠膿疱症(PPP)の病因には病巣感染が深く関与し,特に扁桃と歯性病巣が主要な原病巣となる.病巣感染治療は耳鼻咽喉科や歯科との連携が欠かせない.道北・道東地域におけるPPPに対する歯性病巣治療を促進する目的で歯科医を対象にアンケート調査を行った.PPPの原因について皮膚科と歯科の考えに違いがあり,後者の大部分が金属アレルギーと考えていた.また,皮膚科から歯科への情報提供と連携体制に課題があった.歯科と皮膚科が交流する機会を設け,情報共有の改善を図ることで,診療科連携を強化することが必要である.

feedback
Top