詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "名古屋市立天神山中学校"
2件中 1-2の結果を表示しています
  • 全国算数・数学教育研究鳥取大会実行委員会
    日本数学教育学会誌
    2014年 96 巻 5 号 21-
    発行日: 2014年
    公開日: 2021/04/01
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 浅野 慎一
    基礎教育保障学研究
    2023年 7 巻 20-36
    発行日: 2023年
    公開日: 2023/09/15
    ジャーナル オープンアクセス
    This paper examines the characteristics of Japanese night junior high schools from 1947 to 1955 from the perspective of “challenges” by students and prospective students. The basic perspective of this paper is the social change of post-colonialism. We grasped the reality of students’ silent “challenges” against the contradictions and limitations of compulsory education under the Constitution and the Fundamental Law of Education. Specifically, we examined the characteristics of social change theory behind the 1) school-age students who wished to transfer from daytime junior high school to night junior high school, 2) schoolage students who refused or were absent for a long time who were recruited by teachers, 3) students over-school age, 4) applicants from outside the school district, 5) schoolage students who “hate school” , 6) the causes of economic poverty among students, and 7) foreign students. The causes and background of the various “challenges” of students at that time were: first, post-war compulsory education already included meritocracy, managerialism, and selection and exclusion by teachers, causing serious suffering to the students. Second, economic poverty and disparity inequality inevitably created by the modernization and capital accumulation of Japan under the Cold War and dependence on the United States. Some teachers at night schools partially and piecemeal re-examined their views of compulsory education by accepting a diverse range of students in various conflicts. However, many teachers adhered to modernist social perceptions and compulsory education views, and did not correctly understand the causes of students’ difficulties. In that sense, the various “challenges” of night junior high school students and prospective students during this period did not lead to a fundamental reconsideration of teachers’ view of compulsory education.
feedback
Top