The Ryo-no-shuge is the colleted commentaries on the Ryo code, which were written by Koremune Naomoto in the mid-ninth century. Of its original 50 volumes only 35 remain today. It is generally thought that most of the existing manuscripts can be traced back to the Kanazawabunko MSS. which was contained in the document collection of the Kananazawa family. This collection was established by Kanazawe Sanetoki in the mid-thirteenth century. In this paper the author, by reexamining various notations written at the end of each volume by copyists and readers (okugaki), offers proof that there were actually two different Kanazawabunko MSS.. The manuscript which the author refers to as MS. A is the Kanazawa Sanetoki-bon which contains Vol.1 through 10 of the now existing 35 vols. of the Ryo-no-Shuge. This manuscript was transcribed from the Kazanin MS. which was owned by Kazanin Morotsugu (1222-1281). In MS. A there are okugaki which indicate that it was read by Kanazawa Sanetoki in 1269. MS. B is the Kenji-ninen-okugaki-bon and consists of 36 vols. (Vol.7 being subdivided into two separate volumes). Vol.10 and 20 of MS. B are transcriptions of the Ogimachi MS. the MS. owned by the Ogimachi branch of jurists within the Nakahara family (Hoka-Nakaharashi-Ogimachiryu). Transcriptions of the remaining 34 vols. of MS. B were made using the previously mentioned Kazanin MS. in Keuji 2 (1276). Both MSS. A and B were removed from the Kanazawabunko by Toyotomi Hidetsugu. The former was presented to Imadegawa Harusue in 1593 along with manuscripts of the Ritsu code and the Ryo-no-Gige both of which had also been contained in the Kanazawabunko. MS. A itself has been lost, but there is an excellent transcription called the Momijiyamabunko MS. which was originaly contained in the archives of the Tokugawa shogun, and which is now kept in the Japanese government archives (Naikakubunko). MS. B has been lost as well. However excellent transcriptions may be found in the private collection of Tanaka Yutaka (Tanaka MS.) and also in the archives of the Natioual Diet Library (Seike MS.). While the Tanaka MS. was transcribed in the early Edo period, the Seike MS. was copied between 1597 and 1599 by Funahashi Hidekata whose original family name was Kiyohara, which is abbreriated as "Seike." For further details concerning the Kanazawabuuko MS., please refer to the author's paper entitled "A Search for the Ryo-no-Shuge Kanazawabunko MSS." in Nihonrekishi, no. 371 (April, 1979).

抄録全体を表示

In this paper, the writer tried to systematize many copies of Ryo-no-shuge (_??__??__??_) in all parts of Japan, based on the investigation of them. This trial was done to show the definite standard to the collation of many copies. First of all, the copies of Ryo-no-shuge (_??__??__??_) are syst-ematically classified into two large groups, the group of Kanezawa-bunko-bon (_??__??__??__??__??_) and of Funabashi-bon (_??__??__??_), which had wide circulation in the Edo (_??__??_) era. The group of Kanezawa-bunko-bon(_??__??__??__??__??_) is classified into the group of Naikaku-bunko-bon (_??__??__??__??__??_) recopied from the copy which Morotsugu Fujiwara (_??__??__??__??_) possessed and the group of the copy in 35 volumes which Morotsugu (_??__??_) copied in Kenji (_??__??_) 2. Both of them were borrowed from Kanezawa-bunko (_??__??__??__??_) and were carried to Kyoto by Hidetsugu Toyotomi (_??__??__??__??_).
The former was given to Harusue Kikutei (_??__??__??__??_) and the latter was presented to the Imperial Court As the result of the copy in 35 volumes being copied by noblemen and scholars in the Edo (_??__??_) era, Tanaka-bon(_??__??__??_), Takatsukasa-bon (_??__??__??_), Kamitani-Motohira-bon(_??__??__??__??__??_), etc. are in existence. On the other hand, Funabashi-bon (_??__??__??_) was copied by Mototada Hirata (_??__??__??__??_). It (Hirata-bon, _??__??__??_) was recopied by Sadanari Kazan-in (_??__??__??__??__??_). These are in circulation intricately. In the meantime, three copies which don't belong to the group of Kanezawa-bunko-bon (_??__??__??__??__??_) also exist. The writer found out that they were recopied from the manuscript which had been copied in the Kamakura (_??__??_) era. Therefore, the writer came to the conclusion that Ryo-no-shuge (_??__??__??_) which we are using now is one of the copies made in the Kamakura (_??__??_) era and that Ryo-no-shuge (_??__??__??_) now in use isn't always the original Ryo-no-shuge (_??__??__??__??_). From this point of view, the writer made the pedigree of the copies of Ryo-no-shuge (_??__??__??_).

抄録全体を表示