詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "田尻愛義"
13件中 1-13の結果を表示しています
  • 追悼 臼井勝美先生
    外交史料館報
    2022年 35 巻 136-142
    発行日: 2022年
    公開日: 2022/06/17
    研究報告書・技術報告書 フリー
  • 日本外交の思想
    塩崎 弘明
    国際政治
    1982年 1982 巻 71 号 141-159,L12
    発行日: 1982/08/30
    公開日: 2010/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    This article aims to reappraise the official diplomatic historiography on Japanese-American negotiations from April to December 1941. The foreign minister, MATSUOKA who was alienated from SHIRATORI, kept in mind a grand strategic design that would be a peace resolution between Germany and Britain through the intermediary of Japan and the United States. MATSUOKA was sure that it was difficult to negotiate equally with the United States unless Japan was powerful.
    At first, KONOYE, MUTO and the “Reformist” group approved MATSUOKA's world-policy, the Tokyo-Berlin-Rome-Moscow entente. KONOYE's New Order group made efforts to end the Sino-Japanese War and may have had in mind the completion of the Greater East Asia Co-prosperity Sphere, keeping the United States out of the war.
    But on the coming of the peace negotiations between Japan and the United States, each of the many factions in the Foreign Office and the Military Section of the Government reacted differently to Drought's peace proposal-a proposal was later strategically adopted by F. D. Roosevelt through F. Walker.
    Except for the MATSUOKA and SHIRATORI group, the moderate “Reformists” in the Foreign Office, e. g. the ARITA group, had aimed at a resolution of the Sino-Japanese War, being short of going to war with the United States.
    It seems possible a peace-bargain could have been made between Japan and the United States before the Russo-German War.
    Japanese-American negotiations were dominant in “backdoor diplomacy” because of a strategic bargain. Thus the full story of the outbreak of the Pacific War can not be really described without the framework of the official negotiations from “Draft Understanding” to “Hull Note.”
  • 昭和初期における外交と経済
    松浦 正孝
    国際政治
    1991年 1991 巻 97 号 86-102,L10
    発行日: 1991/05/25
    公開日: 2010/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    Following the occupation of Nanking (December, 1937), the question of how to deal with the currency system in central China so as to weaken the Chiang Kai-shek regime became an important issue for Japan. Most papers concerning this issue have discussed only economic assaults on the Chinese currency, like the Hua Hsing Commercial Bank and similar economic maneuverings.
    However, the situation was more complex. Firstly, the Chinese currency system, introduced with the help of the Britain government adviser Leith-Ross in 1935, was strong, and it looked difficult to destroy. Secondly, even if Japan could succeed in destroying the system, it seemed unlikely that Japan could make an alternative currency system by herself, and the destruction would bring about serious economic confusion in the occupied areas, too. Thirdly, in spite of the existence of anti-British forces in Japan, from an economic viewpoint, the Japanese government strongly needed good relations with Britain and the U. S. A. for the purpose of strengthening her wartime economy, and Britain was anxious about her interests in central China, especially the maintenance of the Chinese currency system. On this occasion the Japanese government placed high hopes on Munakata Hisanori's currency plan for occupied central China.
    The aim of this article is to introduce the hitherto almost unknown Munakata Plan and to examine its political meaning and role. Munakata was a banker of the Bank of Japan, and he had assisted the Chinese currency system reform plan of Leith-Ross, which originally envisioned Anglo-Japanese cooperation on China issues, but which Japan had declined. Now, as the Japanese Army, Navy, and Foreign Ministry's adviser, he made what was essentially a revival of the Leith-Ross's plan, but this time with Japanese participation. His planwas roughly as follows. Under Japan's military and economic mastery over China, Japan reforms the currency system in central China with the cooperation of Britain and other powers, through which she would put an end to the war. Upon the end of hostilities she is able to exploit postwar China.
    The Munakata Plan was promoted with the support of Ikeda Shigeaki (Cabinet Councillor, and later Minister of Finance and Commerce and Industry) and Prime Minister Konoe, the Army General Staff, the Navy and the forces in central China. The plan was also approved by the Cabinet, and it became evidence which the Chamberlain Cabinet used in its decision not to give financial aid to China.
    The defeat of the Munakata Plan was caused mainly by the international factor of Britain's disagreement. However, the opposition of the Ministry of the Army, combined with the difference of stances on China policy between the idealistic Foreign Minister Ugaki and other imperialistic pro-British leaders, like Ikeda, and Ugaki's later resignation also affected the Munakata Plan's failure.
    Now, from today's viewpoint, the Munakata Plan may not seem feasible, but the hope placed by the Japanese government on the plan in the harsh diplomatic environment indicates the high level of importance Japan's moderate leaders attatched to her economic needs.
  • 特集 外交史料館開館50周年
    外交史料館報
    2022年 35 巻 62-71
    発行日: 2022年
    公開日: 2022/06/17
    研究報告書・技術報告書 フリー
  • 史学雑誌
    1978年 87 巻 7 号 1197-1224
    発行日: 1978/07/20
    公開日: 2017/10/05
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 終戦外交と戦後構想
    戸部 良一
    国際政治
    1995年 1995 巻 109 号 5-21,L5
    発行日: 1995/05/20
    公開日: 2010/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    It is said that Japan did not approach her enemies to end the hostilities until the last stage of the Pacific War. But she tried repeatedly to negotiate a cease-fire between herself and Nationalist China (Chungking) during the war. What made Japan consider a separate peace only with China? How did she intend to make peace with China? This paper aims to analyze the objectives of Japan's approach to China and to make clear the circumstances of her peace efforts toward Chungking.
    At first Japan contemplated making peace with China as a part of the plan to weaken the will of the United States to continue the war. As the tide of war turned unfavorably to her, Japan wanted to move her troops stationed in China to the other fronts by making a cease-fire with Chungking. In the last stage of the war, some of the Japanese leaders hoped that China would act as an intermediary between Japan and the United Nations to obtain less severe peace terms than unconditional surrender.
    Japan, however, did not negotiate directly with China. The approaches in the early stage of the war were limited to gathering intelligence about Chinese tendency to make peace. Japanese were afraid that they would betray their weakness if they made overtures to China. Japan relied on the Wang Ching-wei Government (Nanking) to make contact with Chungking. Nanking government leaders, especially Chou Fo-hai, opened and maintained various routes of contact with Chungking through liaison agents. But they used the routes as a means to pursue their own purposes other than making peace overtures.
    Japan did not regard China as a full-fledged member of the United Nations. So she expected that she would be able to exploit the differences between Chungking and its allies and to make a separate peace with it. But China would not show any attitude to accept Japan's overtures. Japan had few resources or means to induce China to consider making a separate peace.
  • 日本外交の非正式チャンネル
    戸部 良一
    国際政治
    1983年 1983 巻 75 号 30-48,L7
    発行日: 1983/10/20
    公開日: 2010/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    The host of Japanese “peace-feelers” who tried to contact the Chinese side in order to bring about peace between the two warring nations in the period 1937-1941 may be regarded as “informal contact-makers” in the context of state-to-state negotiations. Depending on whether contact-makers have official credentials or not and whether their contacts are pre-announced (namely, announced to the public in advance) or not, informal contact-makers are of three types: those with unofficial capacity seeking pre-announced contacts; those with official capacity seeking secret contacts; and those with unofficial capacity seeking secret contacts.
    A detailed analysis of the binational contacts of this period reveals that no peace-feelers belonged to the first type mentioned above, while there were some peace-feelers such as diplomats who, in their official capacity, sought secret contacts. Apart from those diplomats who participated in the peace efforts, however, it is difficult to identify other peace-feelers who could belong to this second type, mainly because of the ambiguity of the definition of “official capacity.”
    The third type of informal contact-makers became active after Japan denied the the legitimacy of the Chinese Nationalist government in January 1938, thus prompting a breaking off of relations. Peace-feelers of this kind in this study included (1) a diplomat who contacted the Chinese at his discretion without advance official approval (2) military officers who without official credentials joined the search for peace; and, most significantly, (3) those private individuals who had no official capacity but who voluntarily sought opportunities for peace, utilizing their own personal ties with the Chinese and other influentials. Typically, they were Matsumoto Shigeharu (a journalist working in Shanghai for Domei News Agency and one of the entourage of Konoe Funimaro), Kayano Nagatomo (a “comrade” of the Chinese Revolution and a friend of Sun Yat-sen), and Nishi Yoshiaki (an official of the South Manchurian Railway Co.).
    The active presence of peace-feelers may be explained by the close, if not friendly, historical contacts between the two peoples and also by the relatively short distance between the two countries and the existence of neutral zones such as Hong Kong, Macao, and the Settlements in Shanghai, which made it easy for the informal contact-makers to operate. Another contributing factor may be the diffuseness of the Japanese (and perhaps Chinese, too) policy-making structures.
  • 外交史料館報
    2012年 25 巻 117-130
    発行日: 2012年
    公開日: 2022/03/18
    研究報告書・技術報告書 フリー
  • 福士 由紀
    現代中国
    2003年 2003 巻 77 号 53-66
    発行日: 2003年
    公開日: 2024/11/05
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 樋口 秀実
    国際政治
    2001年 2001 巻 126 号 185-198,L20
    発行日: 2001/02/23
    公開日: 2010/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    The German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact had a great influence on Japan's diplomatic policy during the Sino-Japanese War era. After the two countries concluded the Pact on October 23, 1939, the Japanese Army was forced to abandon its policy for the settlement of hostilities in China by strengthening the Japanese-German Anti-Comintern Pact. So far the Army had considered that the strengthened Pact would have led to the settlement of hostilities, while would have made the Japanese national defense against the Soviet Union more secure. On the other hand, the Japanese Navy tried to play a leading role in Japan's policy-making towards foreign countries, especially towards China, after the conclusion of the German-Soviet Pact. The Navy, which had taken steps to advance southward, had been apprehensive over that it would increasingly lose a voice over policy-making following the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese War, and the Chang-Ku-Feng and Nomonhan incidents between Japan and the Soviet Union. It had functioned as a brake to control the Army and then had searched for an opportunity to get a powerful voice back. The German-Soviet Pact gave the Navy such a golden opportunity. And Japan took advantage of the new phase of the international political situation that resulted from the signature of the German-Soviet Pact. Britain and France carried out their appeasement policy towards Japan in Asia, while they confronted Germany and the Soviet Union in Europe. The Chinese National Government at Chungking was deeply shocked that the Britain and France considered stopping the Sino-Japanese War once the Wang Jing-Wei regime at Nanking had come into existence. The formation of a united government by Chungking, Nanking and the Chinese Provisional Government at Peking seemed to be possible. What measures Japan took to settle hostilities after the conclusion of the German-Soviet Pact is the matter to be examined in this article, which focuses on the activities of the Navy for the establishment of the Wang regime.
    In order to end the War, the Abe Nobuyuki Cabinet, which was formed shortly after the conclusion of the German-Soviet Pact, began to grope for détente with the United States. In those days, the United States was the only country that could intervene in the China problem, while all other counries, such as Britain, France, Germany, and the Soviet Union, had to grapple with the issues of Europe. Both the Navy and the Japanese Foreign Ministry, which also had a voice in policy-making after the signature of the Pact, prompted this moderate policy towards the United States. The Navy, however, did not agree with the Foreign Ministry as to what measures Japan should take to settle the hostilities in China. The latter had the idea to use the Wang Jing-Wei regime as an intermediary with Chungking Government with a view to the settlement of hostilities. It seemed that Japan's strong measures towards the Wang regime would force him to be Japanese puppet and prevent an intervention by him or the United States with the Chungking Government. The former had a strategic plan that the Wang regime would be obliged to closely cooperate with Japan in a war against the United States. In fact, the United States criticized the Japanese hard-line policy towards the Wang regime and reckoned that there was no use in entering into further negotiations with Japan over th China problem.
  • 長岡 新治郎
    東南アジア研究
    1980年 18 巻 3 号 446-459
    発行日: 1980年
    公開日: 2018/06/02
    ジャーナル フリー
     Following the end of the First World War, the Japanese economy remained stagnant with a decline in foreign trade and the depression continued. To cope with this economic crisis, the Kiyoura Cabinet in 1924 held the Imperial Economic Conference (Teikoku Keizai Kaigi), which was attended by experts from both government and private sectors. Little resulted from this conference, however, since the Cabinet survived only for three months. In 1926 the South Sea Trade Conference (Nanyo Boeki Kaigi) was convened under the auspices of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to promote international trade with the South Seas. In 1934 the Government-General of Taiwan established the Research Committee for Tropical Industries (Nettaisangyo Chosakai) in Taihoku (Taipei) to study such problems as trade between Taiwan and South China as well as the South Seas and the financing of tropical industries. It also decided to establish the Taiwan Colonizing Company (Taiwan Takushoku Kabushiki Gaisha). The Foreign Relations Section (Gaijika) of the Government-General of Taiwan was active in arranging the establishment of the above-mentioned Company which was controlled by Japanese Government. With the outbreak of the Manchurian Incident in 1931 and the Sino-Japanese War in 1937,this Foreign Relations Section grew in importance and it was expanded into the Department of Foreign Relations (Gaijibu) to implement the foreign policy of the government of Japan. This Department played a central role in coordinating such various activities as investment, survey and research, education, cultural exchange, and medical service.
  • 関 智英
    史学雑誌
    2013年 122 巻 11 号 1823-1849
    発行日: 2013/11/20
    公開日: 2017/12/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    This article examines the Reformed Government of the Republic of China (RGRP), which was established in Nanjing in 1938 under the protection of the Japanese Army and was in power until 1940. The RGRP has been regarded in the research to date as a Japanese-controlled puppet regime, similar to that established in Manchukuo. There is no doubt that the RGRP did exhibit some features indicating puppetry ; however, it would have been very difficult for that government to exist if it functioned solely as a Japanese tool. Therefore, the author has chosen to forgo the term "puppet" before determining the true nature of the RGRP. By clarifying its aim and its political stance, the author intends to show that the RGRP did in fact function as a government of China. He begins by considering the RGRP's leadership---Liang Hongzhi, Chen Qun, Wen Zongyao and Wang Zihui---in particular, how they defined the objectives of the new government, delineated visions of China's future and articulated their positions. In fact, the RGRP could not have functioned according to the wishes of these leaders in the midst of any direct intervention on the part of the Japanese military. Moreover, government leaders like Wen Zongyao and Wang Zihui had their own individual political ideas and opinions, as shown by the articles they published, enabling us to grasp the whole picture involving Chinese political discourse during the era in question. Such political ideas and opinions can be observed as having been well embedded within the China's historical experience from the latter half of 19th century through the first half of 20th, as exemplified by views concerning foreign diplomacy. By analyzing the ideas and opinions expressed by the leaders of the RGRP, it becomes possible to learn its true significance in the modern history of China. While taking pro-Japanese, anti-Chiang Kaishek and anti-Nationalist and anti-Communist Party political stances, the RGRP leaders also objectively analyzed the current situation and requested the Japanese to restore the occupied territories to their former condition. The author shows that RGRP was far more independent compared to the previously established the Great Way Government of the Municipality of Shanghai. That being said, the ideas and opinions adopted by the RGRP leadership were no doubt based on the premise that China had lost the Sino-Japanese War ; therefore these ideas and opinions had to change as soon as Wang Jingwei of the Nationalist Party started peace talks with Japan at the end of 1938.
  • 外交史料館報
    2012年 25 巻 81-116
    発行日: 2012年
    公開日: 2022/03/18
    研究報告書・技術報告書 フリー
feedback
Top