詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "稀音家浄観"
7件中 1-7の結果を表示しています
  • ―箏曲と長唄の童曲を題材として―
    山田 美由紀, 長谷川 慎, 安藤 珠希, 藤波 ゆかり, 垣内 幸夫, 福井 昭史, 本多 佐保美
    音楽教育学
    2003年 33 巻 2 号 72-82
    発行日: 2003年
    公開日: 2017/08/08
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 稀音家 義丸
    東洋音楽研究
    1999年 1999 巻 64 号 35-39,L4
    発行日: 1999/08/25
    公開日: 2010/02/25
    ジャーナル フリー
    The nagautaTuna-Yakata” is highly rated as an excellent achievement among the modem Japanese musical works. It has been transmitted to today since it was composed in 1869 and is still one of the most popular nagauta.
    The composer of this piece is KINEYA Kangoro III (KINEYA Rokuzaemon XI). It was reported that he was satisfied with its result as the best one among his many original works. He was ambitious to rivive old musics. “Tuna-Yakata” was produced when he found out an old music “Tuwamono-Azumayazukuri” performed in 1741 but remaind only worded.
    Added “Kusemai” part several years after the first performance, this music became more popularly played. However, there has not been yet an established theory on who originally composed it, when it was composed, or whether Kangoro himself composed it additionally or not, leaving many different opinions. Generally the accepted theory is that “Kusemai” is a diversion from the words of “Kumoi-no-Satokotoba” which was performed by ICHIKAWA Yaozo II in February 1772. However there were many who had doubts about it as the diverted part was very little.
    Recently there was discovered a song book “Kyoran-Ura-Yamabuki” which was performed in November 1833. This was composed by KINEYA Rokuzaemon X and presented for madman dance played by ICHIKAWA Yaozo IV. The words are fully same as “Kusemai” which we play now, being different in tuning; “Kusemai” is Ni-agari (2nd string major) and “Ura-Yamabuki” is San-sagari (3rd string minor). Kangoro, composer of “Tuna-Yakata” was attended as one of the players for “Ura-Yamabuki” when it was first performed. Furthermore, in 1857 Rokuzaemon composed “Irodorimoyoshi-Sumiregusa”, in which the Aikata (intermezzo) was almost same as that of “Kusemai”. Kangoro was also a member of the first place of performance of this play. Rokuzaemon X was father of Kangoro. It might be possible that Kangoro got some hints from the above-mentioned two works to arrange melody and melodic motif into his composition of “Kusemai”.
    YOSHIZUMI Jikyo talked that the addition of “Kusemai” resulted from the fact that, after “Tuna-Yakata” was published in 1874, some dancer desired to produce a dance of “Tuna-Yakata” and requested to make this piece a little longer for his dancing, then the Kusemai part was added on.
    Therefore, I hold the following views to reach a conclusion on composer of “Kusemai”: 1) Kangoro, a composer of “Tuna-yakata”, created “Kusemai” getting hints from his father's two works. It was added after 1874 since this part was not included in the original text published in 1874.
    2) The words are diverted from “Kyoran-Ura-Yamabuki”, not from “Kumoino-satokotoba” that has been accepted so far.
    3) There might be some confusion due to the facts that name of dancer for respective piece was ICHIKAWA Yaozo only with difference of age (the second or the fourth), there were the same words used in both plays, and further, a madman was mainly described in either play.
  • 山内 盛彬
    東洋音楽研究
    1962年 1962 巻 16-17 号 126-133
    発行日: 1962/06/30
    公開日: 2010/11/30
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 東洋音楽研究
    1981年 1981 巻 46 号 211-202
    発行日: 1981/08/25
    公開日: 2010/11/30
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 東洋音楽研究
    1981年 1981 巻 46 号 202-211
    発行日: 1981/08/25
    公開日: 2010/11/30
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 町田 嘉章
    東洋音楽研究
    1952年 1952 巻 10-11 号 76-88
    発行日: 1952/12/25
    公開日: 2010/11/30
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 矢向 正人, 荒木 敏規
    東洋音楽研究
    1998年 1998 巻 63 号 37-56,L3
    発行日: 1998/08/20
    公開日: 2010/02/25
    ジャーナル フリー
    Most shamisen pieces are formed by combinations of numerous melodic patterns, and thus to understand the structure of a piece one must recognize how a melody is blocked into patterns. However, past studies of shamisen melodic patterns have encountered certain difficulties: First, the conception of the length of patterns varies widely among shamisen players and researchers, and even experienced shamisen players have only a subconscious recognition of most of the patterns. Second, although the lengths of some patterns are fixed, most vary according to context, and thus are influenced by preceding and subsequent melodic material.
    In traditional musicology, studies of shamisen melodic patterns have been based on written or oral accounts given by shamisen players, an approach used by MACHIDA Kasho in “A Study of Melodic Patterns in Japanese Vocal Styles Accompanied by Shamisen, ” which presents characteristic melodic patterns found in various vocal styles. MACHIDA's study is helpful for classifying and categorizing previously recognized and fixed melodic patterns, but these patterns are only a fraction of the potential material available in shamisen music. In addition, MACHIDA's list includes patterns that range in length from one to sixty bars, and this vast diversity hinders effective blocking. Consequently, MACHIDA's study cannot provide a thorough approach for blocking a melody into combinations of patterns.
    If one could estimate the approximate length of patterns before blocking, the analysis process would become more efficient. Thus, an analytical method based on information theory would be effective for blocking a piece into patterns. A scanning process would reveal recurring patterns, and subsequently ciphers containing smaller amounts of information could replace the patterns. Blocking a piece with this process would compress the original melody and thus facilitate analysis. Our study adopts the “minimum principle” from Gestalt psychology and assumes that a description of a compressed melody is a rational means by which to describe the structure of the original. Using this assumption we have blocked and compressed the shamisen part of ten nagauta pieces with shamisen-bunka notation.
    We have calculated the total amount of information for describing a melody as a sum of both the amounts for registering the melodic patterns and for describing the original melody by these registered patterns. Balancing these two aspects, we replaced the melodic patterns in the encoded shamisen melodies with ciphers, thus decreasing the total amount of information necessary to describe the patterns. We used two kinds of pattern processing, blocking melodies either by patterns with fixed lengths, or by patterns with lengths that changed according to the most suitable solution for compression. Compression rates reached 67.0 percent by the former process and 59.5 percent by the latter. The latter process also enabled us to extract 1, 482 patterns from 6, 464 bars, and we then described the ten nagauta pieces as combinations of these extracted patterns. In addition, we detected cycles of one, two, four, and eight bars in the encoded melodic sequences. Consequently, this study verifies KOIZUMI Fumio's hypothesis that phrase units in Japanese traditional music are stacked in multiples of two, at least within the nagauta-shamisen genre; however, one must remember that most melodic patterns with the above cycle lengths appear as roughly-matched rather than completely-matched patterns.
    Many studies have used computers to simulate human perceptions and recognitions. Similarly, our method of blocking melodies by compression based on information theory provides an approximate model for human recognition of patterns in shamisen melody, yet at the same time avoids the problems of subjective interpretations
feedback
Top