詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "経済思想史"
829件中 1-20の結果を表示しています
  • 中澤 信彦
    経済学史研究
    2018年 59 巻 2 号 185-186
    発行日: 2018年
    公開日: 2019/10/11
    ジャーナル オープンアクセス
  • 後藤 嘉宏
    図書館学会年報
    1998年 44 巻 2 号 49-64
    発行日: 1998/09/30
    公開日: 2017/08/03
    ジャーナル フリー
    杉原四郎は, マルクスやジョン・スチュワート・ミル, 河上肇を
    経済思想史
    の立場から研究した人として著明であると同時に, 「戦後わが国におけるJ.S.ミル文献(上)(下)」(1954)など社会科学の書誌や解題の作成者としても知られている。本稿は, 杉原がなぜ
    経済思想史
    の研究を書誌的な観点から行っているかを理解しようと試みる。一般的に「比較」は社会科学において重要な方法である。特に杉原の場合, 「比較」とそれによってもたらされる「論争」とが, 彼の方法論の重要な構成要素となっている。杉原の発言をミルの『自由論』の文脈において考察することで, 杉原が「比較」と「論争」に与えた重要な位置を理解できる。このような作業を通じて, 杉原の
    経済思想史
    上の研究と書誌的な研究との不可分性, 一体性が明らかになる。
  • 江戸時代経済思想史研究の二十年
    小室 正紀
    経済学史学会年報
    2003年 43 巻 43 号 68-86
    発行日: 2003年
    公開日: 2010/08/05
    ジャーナル フリー
    This paper surveys mainly the monograph literature regarding Tokugawa economic thought. Considering what the scholars intend to find through their studies, the present article divides the field into four main groups:
    (i) A view based on the stage theory of development or the concept of European economic thought. In this category are included two kinds of works which attach much importance to the stage theory based on Western economic development. A group of scholars comment on the backwardness of Tokugawa economic thought as compared with the Western economic thought which was imported after the Meiji restoration. Another group tries to analyse Tokugawa economic thought in terms of such European concepts as mercantilism or physiocracy. Recently, the scholars of this category make use of their theories more flexibly than previously, as a tool to grasp the character of Tokugawa traditions.
    (ii) A view regarding Tokugawa period as the cradle of Japanese economic growth. The scholars of this category consider that the relatively smooth process of Japanese industrialization was prepared in Tokugawa period. These scholars therefore examine the development of knowledge and thought adequate to the burgeoning market economy of that period. Though they provide some valuable analytical insights into Tokugawa economic thought, some of them might describe the ideas of that period as a too modernised aspect.
    (iii) A view evaluating Confucian economic thought and a view influenced by the post-modern theories. Some scholars in this category think the modern economic society is reaching its limit and evaluate the harmony between economy and morality in Tokugawa Confucianism. Also represented in this category is work inspired by postmodern theory. This kind of study tries to understand the structure or network of miscellaneous discourses, excluding the modern prejudices. Surely this approach shows the world of the thoughts in a certain period realistically, but it should also consider how to regard the world of this period within the context of chronological history.
    (iv) An attempt to discover the traditions of economic thought by non-professional thinkers. The scholars of this category find much meaning among the economic thought produced by such non-professional thinkers as samurai-bureaucrats, village masters, intelligent merchants, and so on. These scholars evaluate such non-professional thoughts as having a character of their own, finding new materials concerning this kind of subject. However, most of these attempts have not yet been able to connect such thoughts with the whole body of Tokugawa economic thought.
    The major publications of each of these categories are critically introduced. The general conclusion is as follows. The divisions that have so characterized the field will be perpetuated in some form. But there is a sense that the very virulent and sterile phase of controversy is spent. Though marked by wide differences in approach and broad diversification of subjects, this field of study is maturing, and the described categories are going to stimulate constructively to one another.
  • 南森 茂太
    経済学史研究
    2017年 58 巻 2 号 63-65
    発行日: 2017年
    公開日: 2019/11/30
    ジャーナル オープンアクセス
  • 杉原 四郎
    経済学史学会年報
    2000年 38 巻 38 号 28-36
    発行日: 2000年
    公開日: 2010/08/05
    ジャーナル フリー
    In his pioneering synthesis, published in 1962, on the Japanese political economists of the Tokugawa (1603-1868) and the Meiji (1868-1912) periods, Eijiro Honjo outlined the development of the study of the history of Japanese economic thought in evolutionary stages. Starting from its beginning in the Meiji, he argued that a foundation was laid for the study of the Tokugawa economic thought in the Taisho (1912-1925) period, while the Meiji economic thought began to become a serious subject of study in the early Showa period, and prewar socialist and Marxist thoughts after the Second World War. Thus the field exhibited a steady expansion in terms of the scope of the subject, the number of scholars and the number of works published. However, Honjo also commented that such a development was dwarfed by the publication of a much larger number of works on the history of Western economic thought, because Japanese universities offered research and teaching posts for the latter, but seldom for the former.
    This was indeed the case at least up to the 1960s. The History of Economic Thought Society of Japan started in 1950 with 123 members, but the total number of papers presented at the Society's biannual meetings on Japanese history during the first five years was as little as seven. Central themes chosen in these meetings usually related to the history of classical political economy and Marxian economics. Almost no attempts had been made to take up a theme centring on Japan. Some members, including myself, did express concern about this state of affairs. Thus, after returning from the study in Europe in 1957-58, I tried to arouse interest in the subject by starting a newsletter for the Kansai branch of the Society in 1959. In 1966-69 a number of researchers, led by Tsuneo Hori, joined the government-funded project on the study of the history of Japanese modernisation since the Meiji, which greatly helped promote the field.
    At its 42nd meeting in November 1978, the Society chose the history of modern Japanese economic thought as a central theme for the first time. The three papers presented in the session discussed the thought and activities of Yukichi Fukuzawa, Shiro Shiba and the Japan Society of Social Policy, respectively, and another three papers on the Tokugawa economic thought were presented in the subsequent individual sessions of this meeting. Reflecting the growth of the number of people seriously interested in the field, this meeting signified the Society's open acknowledgement of the central importance of the study of the Japanese experience for the discipline as a whole. Since then the Society has organised three major publications, each marking the steady development of the field; Nihon no Keizaigaku (The Political Economy in Japan) (1984), Keizaigakushi: Kadai to Tenbo (The History of the Political Economy: Its Missions and Prospects) (1992) and Economic Thought and Modernisation in Japan (1998). Furthermore, the Society's 63rd meeting in November 1999 showed a high standard of scholarship, making the future of the field appear promising. Four excellent papers were presented by the younger generation of scholars, with new source material and perspectives. I could not help recalling Honjo's lecture delivered 60 years ago at Kyoto University, in which he lamented the poor interest in the subject within the discipline. We have come quite a long way.
  • 井上 琢智
    経済学史研究
    2010年 52 巻 1 号 114-115
    発行日: 2010年
    公開日: 2019/10/25
    ジャーナル オープンアクセス
  • 大正期経済思想史研究の20年
    藤井 隆至
    経済学史学会年報
    2004年 45 巻 45 号 55-65
    発行日: 2004年
    公開日: 2010/08/05
    ジャーナル フリー
    The third report in the present series, this paper offers an analysis of important recent studies (from 1980 to the present) of Japanese economic policy and thought in the 1910's and 20's.
    The economy of Japan following WWI can be described particularly in terms of its emphases on scientific development and industrial production. However, this progress in industrial development led to the appearance of a widened gap between rich and poor, and one of the major issues concerning the economic thought of the time was how to improve the lot of the poorer levels of society, including workers, farmers and city dwellers.
    Research in the field of economics during the 1910's and 20's had as one of its focal points the attempt to alleviate this exaggerated difference between the haves and havenots. The economics of the Association for the Study of Social Policy attempted to reduce the gap between rich and poor through the implementation at a national level of specific social policies. The ineffectiveness of these policies, however, resulted in a lack of faith in the ability of the Association to do anything about the situation in a concrete way.
    The crumbling of the economic policies associated with this Association for the Study of Social Policy allowed for the appearance new approaches, such as the Neoclassical economics of Tokuzo Fukuda and the Marxist economics of Hajime Kawakami.
    The present study introduces the work of Kanae Iida and Kanji Kobayashi. Seeking an approach to the study of economics based on firmly-grounded economic theories, this paper presents and comments on the work of Kanae Iida, Mikio Nishioka, Takutoshi Inoue, Tamotsu Nishizawa, Hideomi Tanaka, who themselves each analyzed the ideas of Tokuzo Fukuda. It also introduces and comments on the work of Shiro Sugihara, who investigated the thought of Hajime Kawakami.
    This paper also presents the research of Kunio Yanagita, and comments on the ideas of Yoshiteru Iwamoto and Takashi Fujii, with a particular emphasis on the idea that a suitable ethical policy is critical to the success of any given economic policy.
    Finally, this paper reports a decline, dating from the 1980's to the present day, in the number of studies of particular economic questions and problems, accompanied by a corresponding increase in research on historical individuals. However, it suggests that the work of Aiko Ikeo and others seems to be slowly bringing about a return to a question-centered focus.
  • 明治期経済思想史研究の回顧と展望
    三島 憲之
    経済学史学会年報
    2003年 44 巻 44 号 84-97
    発行日: 2003年
    公開日: 2010/08/05
    ジャーナル フリー
    The purpose of this paper is to consider the direction of the future investigation by way of a review of the studies of the economic thought in the Meiji Period in the last twenty years.
    By studying the economic thought in the Meiji Period, generally not only the economists but also the thinkers, the journalists, the statesmen, the bureaucrats, and the entrepreneurs are made the object. As well, in regard to topics in the study of the Japanese economic thought of the age following the Meiji Restoration, we find at present a general consensus. If it is limited to he Meiji Period, the topics can be summarized as the following three approaches. The firs are studies that examine the so-called “continuance and severance” between the idea which allowed the reception of the Western political economy, and the economic thought in the Edo Period. The second are studies that intend to clarify the introduction of the Western political economy into Japan. The third are studies that aim to elucidate the process of the diffusion and the fixation of the Western political economy in Japan. In this paper, the first is called “the approach focusing on continuance and severance, ” the second is called “the approach focusing on the history of the introduction, ” while the third is called “the approach focusing on institutionalization.”
    In addition to those studies pursuing the above three lines of thought, there are studies that examine the economic policy ideas and the economic vision in the Meiji Period. This is called the “approach focusing on the history of the economic policy ideas.” This paper emphasizes the importance of the studies taking this point of view.
    Two ideas are fairly suggestive in the study talking the latter approach. One is “developmentalism.” This principle focuses on the nationalism of a backward country, industrialization under the governmental leadership, and the affirmation of governmental intervention in an economy. This can provide a conceptual framework for further study because its elements were widely contained in various economic policy ideas and economic visions appearing in the Meiji Period. The other one is the result of the more recent studies regarding the mercantilism. The authors of such studies insist on the following: Most political economy is structured in such a way that government can intervene to any degree in the market from the viewpoint of the public utility. And, free trade and protectionism often complement each other. If this view is accurate, the validity of the simple point of view in which free trade and protectionism confront each other must be reconsidered, this being true in the studies of the economic thought in the Meiji Period as well.
  • 経済学史学会年報
    2000年 38 巻 38 号 170-172
    発行日: 2000年
    公開日: 2010/08/05
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 石井 信之
    経済学史学会年報
    1996年 34 巻 34 号 151
    発行日: 1996年
    公開日: 2010/08/05
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 尾近 裕幸
    経済学史学会年報
    2001年 39 巻 39 号 188-189
    発行日: 2001年
    公開日: 2010/08/05
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 河野 健二
    経済学史学会年報
    1970年 8 巻 8 号 26-29
    発行日: 1970年
    公開日: 2010/08/05
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 長峰 章
    経済学史研究
    2021年 63 巻 1 号 78-79
    発行日: 2021年
    公開日: 2022/01/13
    ジャーナル オープンアクセス
  • 石井 信之
    経済学史学会年報
    1987年 25 巻 25 号 14-28
    発行日: 1987年
    公開日: 2010/08/05
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 田中 敏弘
    経済学史学会年報
    1993年 31 巻 31 号 158
    発行日: 1993年
    公開日: 2010/08/05
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 藤井 賢治
    経済学史学会年報
    1999年 37 巻 37 号 194-195
    発行日: 1999年
    公開日: 2010/08/05
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 吉沢 芳樹
    経済学史学会年報
    1974年 12 巻 12 号 23a-24
    発行日: 1974年
    公開日: 2010/08/05
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 税制改革論を中心に
    南森 茂太
    経済学史研究
    2008年 50 巻 1 号 62-78
    発行日: 2008/07/31
    公開日: 2010/08/05
    ジャーナル フリー
    Takahira Kanda, with his lifelong interest in economic problems, was a pioneering scholar, teacher, and translator of Western economics in Japan. His Keizai shogaku [Elementary Economics] (1867), for which he translated Western-language sources, is particularly well-known. But it is an earlier work, Noshoben [An Exact Explanation of an Agrarian Nation and a Merchant Nation], published in 1861 that is the focus of this paper. In this book, Kanda's economic thinking appears radical by the standards of the time. It has drawn the attention of economic historians for what they see as a liberal side, and its arguments have often been compared with Western economics. What scholars have tended to overlook, however, is the side of Noshoben that clearly reflects the economic thought prevailing in Japan at the time.
    Contrary to the current image of Noshoben, this paper attempts to demonstrate that Kanda's thought was largely based on the economic thought of the Edo era. In that book, he argued that taxes on farmers were the cause of the budget deficit and the poverty of farmers, and that those conditions invited aggression by foreign countries, which meant, he said, the necessity of reforming the existing tax system. He proposed tax reform by treating revenue from farm products as commercial profits, and he argued that promoting foreign trade would be effective to increase commercial profits. Those ideas were not new. We can find them in the work of Toshiaki Honda, for example, who wrote most of his treatises in the late 18th century. Nonetheless, Noshoben had considerable originality. For instance, while many Edo era economists regarded merchants as wily and untrustworthy, encouraging the shogunate or feudal rulers to maintain strict control over trade with foreign countries, Kanda recognized the important role merchants could play in external trade, and, consequently, in strengthening the domestic economy. His idea of imposing a tax on the profits of merchants was radical at that time.
  • 小島 修一
    経済学史研究
    2007年 49 巻 1 号 174-175
    発行日: 2007/06/30
    公開日: 2010/08/05
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 井上 琢智
    経済学史学会年報
    2002年 42 巻 42 号 137-138
    発行日: 2002年
    公開日: 2010/08/05
    ジャーナル フリー
feedback
Top