詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "裴旻"
2件中 1-2の結果を表示しています
  • ―祝允明を中心として―
    下野 健児
    書学書道史研究
    1993年 1993 巻 3 号 87-101
    発行日: 1993/06/30
    公開日: 2010/02/22
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 劉勰・張懐瓘・張彦遠
    亀澤 孝幸
    書学書道史研究
    2014年 2014 巻 24 号 1-14,119
    発行日: 2014年
    公開日: 2015/04/11
    ジャーナル フリー
    In this article I seek out connections between Liu Xie's 劉勰 views on literature, Zhang Huaiguan's 張懷瓘 views on calligraphy, and Zhang Yanyuan's 張彦遠 views on painting and thereby attempt to highlight the way in which connections were forged between literature, calligraphy, and painting from the Wei, Jin, and Northern and Southern Dynasties through to the Tang.
      First, a certain aesthetic is shared by these three men. The aesthetic concept of fenggu 風骨 (lit. "wind and bone") proposed by Liu Xie represented an idea intended to criticize the rhetorical tendencies of contemporary literature and advocate a return to the Five Classics of Confucianism. About two hundred years later, Zhang Huaiguan of the high Tang adopted the term fenggu in an attempt to relativize the view of calligraphy culminating in Wang Xizhi 王羲之 that had become established since the reign of Taizong 太宗 in the early Tang. Furthermore, a fragment of Zhang Huaiguan's Huaduan 畫斷, in which he applies the term fenggu to painting theory, is quoted in Zhang Yanyuan's Lidai minghua ji 歷代名畫記. They all employed the aesthetic concept of fenggu to give expression to an idea that embodied an aspiration for what was simple and powerful rather than what was ornate and elegant.
      In addition, Liu Xie, Zhang Huaiguan, and Zhang Yanyuan were also interconnected in terms of ontology insofar that they each questioned what "writing," "calligraphy" or "painting" is. Liu Xie, basing himself on the Yijing 易經, argued that "writing" (wen 文) is a manifestation of the Way (dao 道) and formulated a theory of the universal value of "writing" qua literature. Following on from this, Zhang Huaiguan, while recognizing that "writing" and "calligraphy" exist as a single entity, discovered the unique position of "calligraphy" as something that has a different function from "writing." Lastly, Zhang Yanyuan argued for the unity of calligraphy and painting and found the essence of painting, like that of calligraphy, in the vitality of the brushwork.
      In this fashion, there can be found in Liu Xie, Zhang Huaiguan, and Zhang Yanyuan a theoretical process in which literature, calligraphy, and painting became interconnected as if to form a trinity.
feedback
Top