Gikyo ITO,
On the name “
Zoroaster”
An Eastern Access to “
Zaraθustra”: In the Ahunawar Confession, the earliest Zoroastrians confess their belief thus: ‘Your Reverence are (more lit. Thy Reverence is) the instructor (
dazdar-) whom the Sacred Beings have appointed pastor (
vastar-) for us the poor’.
By the Prophet Zoroaster, the followers called
asavan- were divided into two groups: one was called
aredra- ‘rich, blessed’ and the other
drigu- ‘poor’. The former are those qualified for the heavenly property (
isti-) already in their life-time whereas the latter not yet qualified for it. The Sacred Beings that are possessed of it are also called
aredra-. For Zoroaster, the appropriate to be instructed and cultivated are no other than ‘the poor’, because ‘the blessed’ are fit for future salvation.
By his self-styled 1st person humble name or title
Zaraθustra ‘keeper of old, decrepit camels’, Zoroaster shows himself as a poor one (
drigu-) appropriate for salvation. We can see why the earliest followers avoided to call him by the name
Zaraθustra, his proper and personal name given by his father being
Spitdma.
Readers will find my latest interpretation of the Ahunawar Confession (pp. 21-24 and n. 16) as well as my argument to show
Zaraθustra as his self-styled title, rejecting its interpretation as ‘camel-driver’ or as ‘of golden radiance’.
抄録全体を表示