詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "銅器時代"
722件中 1-20の結果を表示しています
  • 道野 鶴松
    日本化學雜誌
    1963年 84 巻 4 号 324-325,A23
    発行日: 1963/04/10
    公開日: 2011/05/30
    ジャーナル フリー
    前報において,イラン出上の古代金属利器でB.C.約1000年頃の製作品と推定されている矛および剣の化学的研究の結果により,古代イランにおいても,これらの金属利器類の製作された年代の前後に,
    銅器時代から青銅器時代
    への変遷が行なわれたのであろうという銅器・青銅器両時代の転換期説と
    銅器時代
    の存在性説とを提唱した。
    今回もイランのほぼ同時代の製作品と考えられているヤジリ7点の化学的研究を行なったところ,幸いにも上記の銅器・青銅器両時代の転換期説ならびに
    銅器時代
    の存在性説をさらに強調確証し得るような結果が得られた。
  • 道野 鶴松
    日本化學雜誌
    1963年 84 巻 4 号 321-323,A23
    発行日: 1963/04/10
    公開日: 2011/05/30
    ジャーナル フリー
    東京大学イラク・イラン遺跡調査団がイラン地区の現地において発掘または入手された同地区の古代金属利器中の,発掘品である矛および剣合計6点(B.C.約1000年頃の製作品と推定されるもの)の提供を受け化学的研究を行なったところ,これらの金属利器類中にスズをほとんど含んでいない銅器と,スズを相当量含有している青銅器とがあった。よって著者はイラン地区においても,さきに古代中国の場合について報告したのと同様,これらの金属利器類の製作された年代の前後に,
    銅器時代から青銅器時代
    への変遷が行なわれたのであろうとの銅器・青銅器両時代の転換期説,さらに引いては
    銅器時代
    が存在しておったであろうという
    銅器時代
    の存在性説を提唱するにいたった次第である。
  • ノールズ・マハレ遺跡下層出土土器を中心に
    有松 唯
    オリエント
    2007年 50 巻 2 号 28-54
    発行日: 2007年
    公開日: 2010/03/12
    ジャーナル フリー
    Materials excavated from the deep layer of Noruz Mahale are from the Bronze Age. Arimatsu No other Bronze Age materials have been excavated on the Southwest Caspian coast. Moreover, it is important that among them is pottery similar to the LBGW (Late Bronze Age Gray Ware) from Gorgan on the southeast Caspian coast. This is farther west they have been excavated. It means the LBGW culture flowed into this region as early as the Bronze Age and that LBGW or LBGW-like pottery extended to a far wider area than was thought before.
    Generally, it is said that LBGW is the ancestor of the Early Iron Age pottery in the northern part of Iran. However, there is no direct relationship between the characteristics of pottery from Noruz Mahale and those of pottery of the Early Iron Age in this region. On the other hand the funerary practices and bronze materials of the Early Iron Age in this region use many elements which owe their origin to the Caucasus. So, it is probably best if we accept that in the change from the Bronze Age to the Iron Age in Iran there were influences from various areas and assume that there were diverse aspects of this change in each region.
  • ポルトゥガリ Y., 牧野 久実
    オリエント
    1989年 32 巻 1 号 119-139
    発行日: 1989/09/30
    公開日: 2010/03/12
    ジャーナル フリー
  • デャドヴォ遺跡の事例を中心として
    千本 真生
    オリエント
    2014年 56 巻 2 号 16-36
    発行日: 2014/03/31
    公開日: 2017/04/03
    ジャーナル フリー
    Pottery with cord-impressed decoration is representative of the Early Bronze Age in southeastern Europe. But little attention has been paid to a systematic study of it in terms of typology and provenance analysis. This paper presents the characteristics and the process of the changes using 32 sherds from Dyadovo in Upper Thrace, Bulgaria.
     The first half of this article demonstrates a close correlation between typological traits in form, pattern and decoration. Judging from the stratigraphic context, small bowls decorated with a right-twisted cord appeared earlier than shallow bowls and deep bowls decorated with a left-twisted cord. A comparison of Dyadovo pottery with pottery from surrounding areas reveals that each area had distinctive characteristics. Hence it is concluded that the small bowls were not imported directly from the northwestern Pontic areas to the north, but rather that the method of decoration was diffused.
     The second half of this article shows the results of ceramic petrographic investigations with polarizing and binocular microscopes carried out on these sherds and on about 300 sherds from Dyadovo, and on clay samples collected nearby and on Sveti Iliya Hill, about 5 km away. The analysis demonstrates that most of the shallow bowls and the deep bowls were made of granitoid-derived clay (Type I), and so were local wares. However, it is likely that the flint or jasper in the paste of the small bowls (Type II) came from a zone around the southern foot of Mt. Sliven in Upper Thrace. It is concluded that after the advent of cord-impression decoration in Upper Thrace, the small bowls were made in the Sliven region, some of which were imported to Dyadovo, and thereafter, shallow bowls and deep bowls of local Dyadovo ware came to be decorated with cord impressions until the decline of the settlement.
  • 寺石 正路
    東京人類學會雜誌
    1892年 8 巻 81 号 69-89
    発行日: 1892/12/28
    公開日: 2010/06/28
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 千本 真生
    オリエント
    2016年 59 巻 1 号 57-73
    発行日: 2016/09/30
    公開日: 2019/10/01
    ジャーナル フリー

    Pottery with cord decoration was spread throughout the Balkan Peninsula in the 4th and the 3rd millennia cal. BC. Researchers have considered that this reflects the spread over Europe of herders who supposedly belonged to the Proto-Indo-European group. Previous studies have focused on the Kurgans (mound tumuli) to tackle the issue of how the people spread. However, this paper looks at the issue by exploring whether and how the cord decoration was diffused from the northern Pontic area into the upper Thracian plain. In order to test the diffusion model mentioned by N. Merpert and G. Georgiev, I analyzed the pottery with cord decoration in the eastern Balkans, ranging from Southern Bulgaria (Upper Thrace) to Eastern Romania (the Moldova plain), focusing on decorating technique, vessel form and stylistic pattern. In particular I looked at the small bowls with a straight open rim, decorated with a fine geometric motif using a thin (less than 2 mm in width) Z-plied cord, which first appeared in Upper Thrace at around 3,000 cal. BC. The absence of this small bowl in the Balkans except in Upper Thrace suggests that the bowl was not imported from the north. My comparative analysis also showed that besides these bowls in Upper Thrace, thin Z-plied cord was used to decorate pottery only in the western Moldova plain during the 4th and the earlier 3rd millennia cal. BC. Therefore, the similarity in cord impression technique between the two regions demonstrates that this technique was presumably brought into Upper Thrace from the north when the northern groups moved southwards and had contacts with indigenous groups in Upper Thrace. It is highly probable that this technique was not diffused directly from the western Moldova plain to Upper Thrace. It must derive from the north Pontic area. It is clear that more research is needed on this subject.

  • 寺石 正路
    東京人類學會雜誌
    1893年 8 巻 83 号 157-166_1
    発行日: 1893/02/28
    公開日: 2010/06/28
    ジャーナル フリー
  • トランスコーカサス文化とメソポタミア文化との結節点
    紺谷 亮一
    オリエント
    1999年 42 巻 1 号 121-138
    発行日: 1999/09/30
    公開日: 2010/03/12
    ジャーナル フリー
    The Uruk Period is considered to be the period in which a large scale trading network expanded to the north, mainly along the Euphrates river, nearly covering the entire area of Western Asia. This period corresponds to the Late Chalcolithic Period in Anatolia. The main cities in this period were generally located in places where communication could be conducted by water.
    As far as the trading network is concerned, the contact between Mespotamian alluvial plains and the mountainous regions such as Zagros and Taurus foot hill has been emphasised. Apparently, northern Syria, northern Mesopotamia and southwestern Iran had close relationships with the Uruk culture. On the other hand, Anatolia is considered as a local region indirectly influenced by Uruk culture. Such influence came from main cities in the middle Euphrates basin (Habuba Kabira).
    However, from a different point of view, it is possible to construct an entirely new theory for Anatolian culture in this period. Evidence supporting such a theory was found at Arslantepe, which is located near the city of Malatya in the upper Euphrates basin, eastern Anatolia. Its altitude is high enough to bring to snow and severely cold winter to this region. In spite of that, the Uruk merchants expanded their trading network as far as the mountainous regions to acquire the rich mineral resources of Anatolia.
    Furthermore, according to new archaeological materials, Arslantepe, in which Uruk and Transcaucasian materiais were found together, suggests a close relation between the Transcaucasian region, Black Sea region, eastern Anatolia and Mesopotamia. The Transcaucasian region has richer mineral resources than Anatolia, as well as developed metal industries. Arslantepe played a role as the transport center between its northern neighboring region like Transcaucasus and southern Mesopotamia. This is based on a new trading network system which had not been proposed until now.
  • 中江 秀雄
    鋳造工学
    2013年 85 巻 4 号 233-237
    発行日: 2013/04/25
    公開日: 2018/01/01
    ジャーナル フリー
  • ノート マルティーン, 森岡 妙子
    オリエント
    1962年 5 巻 1 号 47-66
    発行日: 1962/03/31
    公開日: 2010/03/12
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 古代支那に於ける純銅器青銅器雨時代の轉換期に就いて
    道野 鶴松
    人類學雜誌
    1933年 48 巻 2 号 101-104
    発行日: 1933/02/15
    公開日: 2010/06/28
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 三宅 裕
    Journal of MMIJ
    2008年 124 巻 9 号 554-561
    発行日: 2008/09/25
    公開日: 2011/02/15
    ジャーナル フリー
    The exploitation of copper in Ancient Western Asia has a long history. Already in the Neolithic period malachite was used as raw material for bead and pigment, and then native copper was shaped into small objects by hammering and annealing. Based on the evidence from copper objects and workshops found in Iran and Anatolia, smelting and casting were carried out in the 5th millennium B.C. In the early copper production it is likely that the oxide ores such as malachite were used as raw material which was smelted in the crucible set on the shallow pit furnace with the aid of blow pipes. The advent of alloy in the late 4th millennium B.C., another significant development in early metallurgy, might make casting easier and more successful. The first copper alloy was arsenical copper which continued to produce until the end of the Middle Bronze Age along with bronze, an alloy of copper and tin. By the second half of the 3rd millennium the copper production in the vicinity of the sources became prevailing. The Late Bronze Age shipwrecks in the Mediterranean provide good evidence for the long distance trade of copper and tin in the shape of ingot.
  • 足立 拓朗, 藤井 純夫
    オリエント
    2010年 52 巻 2 号 93-107
    発行日: 2010/03/31
    公開日: 2014/03/31
    ジャーナル フリー
    Our research project entitled “Comparative Studies of Burial Practices of Semitic Ancient Pastoral Nomads” shed light on Bronze Age cairn fields in the northwestern flank of Mt. Bishri, central Syria. A comparative study of a toggle pin from Burial Cairn No. 09 of Wadi Hedaja 1 enabled us to tentatively date them to a time range the end of Early Bronze Age to the beginning of Middle Bronze Age. This paper briefly discusses the dating from another viewpoint, namely, a chronological review of stone and faience beads. Their reexamination shows that the Bishri Bronze Age cairn fields include Types 3 and 16 beads of K. R. Maxwell-Hyslop’s classification, and that similar examples were also found at the Early to Middle Bronze Age settlements along the Middle Euphrates River Basin. Both observations revalidated our previous dating.
  • 後藤 光一郎
    オリエント
    1976年 19 巻 1 号 17-31,104
    発行日: 1976/09/30
    公開日: 2010/03/12
    ジャーナル フリー
    In Palestine, the so-called “Tree of Life” motif had been represented repeatedly on Late Bronze Age potteries and cylinder seals. The style on the latters reflects almost Mitannian common style. In this connection, the author defined characteristics to the Mitannian glyptic or ornamental representation as following: 1) Union Jack pattern, 2) lattice pattern and 3) maximum use of drilling in the Tree of Life and animals of peculiar style, according to Speiser and Buchanan.
    Tracing the cylinder seals under such conditions unearthed in Palestine back to archaeological context, it was attested that they were distributed to or around some of the public or sacred Late Bronze Age constructions in the cities along the main or sub-international trade route. Most of these cities accord those which have been referred in the Amarna letters as politically or strategically important points. Active economic give-and-takes among the big powers in the Amarna Age Orient may have given them direct contacts to the Mitannian art through caravans via northern Syria and small groups of northern people settled in the cities.
  • 道野 鶴松
    人類學雜誌
    1932年 47 巻 6 号 189-192_1
    発行日: 1932/06/15
    公開日: 2010/06/28
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 杉本 智俊
    オリエント
    2001年 44 巻 1 号 95-116
    発行日: 2001/09/30
    公開日: 2010/03/12
    ジャーナル フリー
    During 1997-1998 seasons of excavation in Tel Rehov, Israel, a small religious structure from the time of the United Kingdom (Iron Age IIA) was unearthed. Amihai Mazar, its excavator, has already published a preliminary report, in which he called this structure a “bamah”. However, he has not discussed its nature in detail and the ambiguity of the term “bamah” is well known. Since it is a fascinating structure in understanding the real picture of Israelite religion during the Kingdom period, we attempted to define its nature by setting it in the typological development of the religious structures in ancient Palestine.
    As a result, we can point out the following significances.
    1. This structure reflects the religious situation of the beginning of the Iron Age, when the great temples of LB period disappeared almost completely and small local sanctuaries increased. Small sanctuaries within towns closely related to daily activities are especially the hallmark of this period. This may suggest that the establishment of the Israelite State and the building of the central Temple in Jerusalem deprived the independent positions of the great temples of the Canaanite City States.
    2. This structure will give insights to the variety of the local religious activities during the Israelite Kingdom. The small sanctuaries of this period can be subdivided into ones inside towns, outside towns, and around city gates. The first and the second both have interior and open-air types. The structure of Tel Rehov can be categorized as one inside the town and open-air. Animal sacrifice and community meal seem to have been included in its religious rite. Since most of the sanctuaries inside towns are of interior type, the one in Arad, which is not reported in detail, is the only other example of this type. The sanctuaries at Lachish and Hazor have both cult rooms and open courtyards. However, their open areas do not have any evidence of animal sacrifice, and in this sense they are not exactly the same as the ones in Tel Rehov and Arad. The religious structure found in Tel Rehov, therefore, is a unique example which enables us to clarify the full picture of th e local religious activities held in the open courtyard during the Iron Age.
  • 道野 鶴松
    化学教育
    1972年 20 巻 5 号 357-361
    発行日: 1972/10/20
    公開日: 2017/09/22
    解説誌・一般情報誌 フリー
  • その関連づけの正否について
    宮崎 修二
    オリエント
    2003年 46 巻 1 号 57-82
    発行日: 2003/09/30
    公開日: 2010/03/12
    ジャーナル フリー
    In the research of ancient Palestine, Tel Zeror, located in the northern Sharon plain, is generally considered to be a site once occupied by the Sikil Sea People (formerly known in the scholarship as Tjekker) in the early Iron Age. The examination of artifacts brought from mid 1960s excavations of Tel Zeror, some of which are examined here for the first time, reveals that the site's ethnic association with the Sikils is not sufficiently supported, despite the fact that some “Philistine” indicators, such as the lion-headed cup, or “rhyton”, and bottle pyxis were found at the site. The material culture revealed by the early Iron Age layers, including collared-rim pithoi, fails to demonstrate that a certain ethnic group was dominant among the population of Tel Zeror in this period. Furthermore, the common assumption that a fortress that once stood at Tel Zeror that dates back to the late 11th century BC was built by the Sikils is belied by the fact that recent excavations at nearby Dor indicate that the Sikil's settlement there had been destroyed before the fortress was constructed at Tel Zeror.
    The history of the northern Sharon plain in the late 11th century BC should not be characterized chiefly in terms of Philistine material culture. The local Canaanite tradition still existed, and “Phoenician” influences had started to emerge. The Philistine, or Sea Peoples, culture only played a limited role outside the southern coastal plain, with the probable exceptions of coastal cities in the north, like Dor and Akko. It is more likely that the basic cultural character of early Iron Age Tel Zeror belonged to the continuity of the local tradition. New elements, which can possibly interpreted as belonging to the Sea Peoples, do not have any significance in the material culture of early Iron Age Tel Zeror, particularly in the late 11th century BC. Archaeologically, the Sikil's dominance over the northern Sharon plain cannot be demonstrated in the way most scholars have come to accept.
  • 支那古代純銅器之部(その二)支那古代青銅器之部(その二)古代支那に於ける青銅器の出現期と,純銅器,青銅器兩時代の轉換期に就て
    道野 鶴松
    日本化學會誌
    1933年 54 巻 4 号 251-255
    発行日: 1933年
    公開日: 2009/12/22
    ジャーナル フリー
feedback
Top