詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "雑号将軍"
5件中 1-5の結果を表示しています
  • 関尾 史郎
    法制史研究
    1992年 1992 巻 42 号 282-284
    発行日: 1993/03/30
    公開日: 2009/11/16
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 三崎 良章
    史学雑誌
    1998年 107 巻 5 号 868-874
    発行日: 1998/05/20
    公開日: 2017/11/30
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 直江 直子
    史学雑誌
    1999年 108 巻 5 号 835-842
    発行日: 1999/05/20
    公開日: 2017/11/30
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 前島 佳孝
    史学雑誌
    1999年 108 巻 8 号 1455-1476,1546-
    発行日: 1999/08/20
    公開日: 2017/11/30
    ジャーナル フリー
    Concerning the "Bazhuguo 八柱国", lauded for their distinguished service to the Western Wei Dynasty, the end of chapter 16 of the Zhoushu 周書 mentions that these official posts were established in AD 550 (Datong 大統 16). Occupying the top position among the seven Zhuguo-dajianjun 柱国大将軍 other than the Northern Zhou's Wendi YuwenTai 文帝宇文泰 was the Tang imperial ancestor LiHu 李虎 ; however, the official posts of Taiwei 太尉, Shangshu-zuopushe 尚書左僕射, and Longyou-xingtai 隴右行臺 added here are in conflict with the actual bureaucratic system of the time, showing that they were added by later editors. The Western Wet modeled its bureaucracy after the Zhouli 周礼, rather than adopting the former Northern Wei system. The first step in the process, a framework for bureaucratic reform created in the fifth month of 548, abolished Sangong / Erda 三公・二大 in favor of the Liuqing 六卿 system. As a result, the position of Dajiangjun was relegated to a ranked status with no official duties. The post of Taiwei had probably already been abolished, since there is no mention of it as of 550. Furthermore, Shangshu-zuopushe was a much lower position than mentioned, and the existence of Longyou-xingtai cannot be corroborated for that era. Judging from the other posts, the author estimates that the actual position occupied by Lieu among all eight Zhuguo-dajiangjun was seventh, implying that the order was changed during the editing of the Zhoushu. The reordering of the generals can be explained by the fact that Lieu was the imperial ancestor of the Tang Dynasty and that the Zhoushu comes to us from the books selected for imperial perusal at the beginning of the Tang period. After all, it would have been politically incorrect to list the any ancestor of the present emperor second to another. The anomalous bureaucratic posts attributed to the Western Wei probably reflect the system in force at the time that the Zhoushu was edited at the beginning of the Tang period. Here is at least one example showing the necessity for careful critical review of both the narrative, especially concerning the Tang imperial ancestor, and the source materials cited in the Tang period imperial selections.
  • 白須 淨眞
    史学雑誌
    1979年 88 巻 1 号 25-48,135-134
    発行日: 1979/01/20
    公開日: 2017/10/05
    ジャーナル フリー
    The kingdom of Kao-ch'ang under the rule of the Ch'u (麹) clan (A.D. 498-640) was a unique Chinese Kingdom in Central Asia. The author has made a study of Kao-ch'ang's aristocracy from Sepulchal inscriptions unearthed in the Astana and Yar-Khoto tombs, the results of which may be summarized as follows. First, local powerful families were hereditary groups that held posts at the local government level in Chiao-ho-ch'eng (交河城). As a general rule they were only buried in the Yar-Khoto tombs. They formed a group of low ranking officials who could not rise to the fifth fank (五品) and above in the administrative system of Kao-ch'ang. Second, central powerful families were a hereditary group of officials who held posts in the capital city, Kao-ch'ang-ch'eng (高昌城). As a general rule they were only buried in the Astana tombs. They were high ranking officials who could ever rise to the third rank (三品) in the administrative system. Third, originally posts at the third rank and above were exclusively reserved for members of the Ch'u royal family. But the Chang (張) clan managed to rise to Such exclusive posts through close matrimonial ties with the royal family. They were a clan that reached the top of Kao-cha'ng's aristocratic society, occupying the highest civil and military appointments, the Wan-ts'ao lang-chung (綰曹郎中) and the tso-wei ta-chiang-chun (左衛大将軍). Fourth, from the above we can say that Kao-ch'ang's aristocratic society was based on official rank and in principal consisted of ; royalty of the third and higher ranks ; central powerful families of the fifth and higher ranks ; and local powerful families of the sixth rank and below.
feedback
Top