Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Arrhythmia/Electrophysiology
The Impact of Diastolic Dysfunction on the Atrial Substrate Properties and Outcome of Catheter Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Yu-Feng HuTsui-Lieh HsuWen-Chung YuSung-Hao HuangHsuan-Ming TsaoChing-Tai TaiYenn-Jiang LinShih-Lin ChangLi-Wei LoTa-Chuan TuanChien-Jung ChangWen-Chin TsaiPi-Chang LeeWei-Hua TangShih-Ann Chen
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2010 Volume 74 Issue 10 Pages 2074-2078

Details
Abstract

Background: The presence of diastolic dysfunction increases the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), and might be associated with the left atrial (LA) substrate. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationships between the diastolic dysfunction, atrial substrate and outcome of the catheter ablation. Methods and Results: Eighty-three patients with paroxysmal AF were enrolled. Diastolic dysfunction was defined as a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≥50%, and one of the following criteria: (1) a mitral inflow early filling velocity to atrial filling velocity ratio (E/A) of ≤0.75; or (2) an E/A ratio of >0.75 and a ratio of the mitral inflow early filling velocity to the velocity of the early medial mitral annular ascent of >10. Patients with diastolic dysfunction were older than those with normal cardiac function. There were no differences in the other baseline characteristics, LA diameter, or LVEF. A decreased LA voltage, and higher recurrence rate were noted in patients with diastolic dysfunction. In the univariate analysis, the patients with recurrence had a lower LA voltage and greater diastolic dysfunction. The multivariate analysis also indicated diastolic dysfunction and LA voltage as independent predictors of recurrence. Conclusions: The patients with diastolic dysfunction developed a different atrial substrate and had a worse outcome of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. (Circ J 2010; 74: 2074-2078)

Content from these authors
© 2010 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top