Post-ISCHEMIA Trial Era

Reconsideration of the Role of Nuclear Cardiology in Patients with Chronic Coronary Artery Disease

Abstract

The International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial has had a great impact on the management of chronic coronary artery disease (CAD). One of the implications of this trial is the importance of close patient follow-up. To improve patient prognosis, evaluation of the residual extent of ischemia after treatment may be important because several studies have shown a close relationship between residual ischemia and cardiac events. For this assessment, myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS) has been utilized and is almost the only modality.
Among the participants in the ISCHEMIA trial, more than 10% were excluded due to the absence of obstructive CAD. The pathophysiology of ischemia without non-obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) is gaining recognition; however, diagnosis is difficult, except for the assessment of myocardial flow reserve (MFR). Myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography (PET) is the most common modality for noninvasive evaluation of MFR; however, its availability in Japan is limited. For a breakthrough in this situation, a novel gamma camera with a cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) semiconductor might be one of the solutions that enables the evaluation of MFR with a commercially available perfusion tracer, similar to PET. Another solution is a novel PET tracer with a longer half-life. Clinical trials with ¹⁸F labeled perfusion agents have been initiated in Japan, and in a few years, delivery of this perfusion tracer will result in more frequent and easier assessment of MFR.