Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Online ISSN : 2186-1005
Print ISSN : 1341-1098
ISSN-L : 1341-1098
Original Article
Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Bupivacaine in Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block for Cardiac Surgery with Median Sternotomy
Rong-En QiuYun-Ping LanShan LiuXiang-Yu FangYun-Feng Zhang
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS

2025 Volume 31 Issue 1 Article ID: oa.25-00008

Details
Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of liposomal bupivacaine (Lip-BPVC) versus standard bupivacaine (BPVC) for superficial parasternal intercostal plane block in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) via median sternotomy.

Methods: A total of 82 adult patients were randomly assigned to the BPVC group (n = 41) or the Lip-BPVC group (n = 41).

Results: The Lip-BPVC group demonstrated significantly lower pain scores at all postinjection time points compared to the BPVC group with fewer opioid analgesics. Lip-BPVC demonstrated an initial heightened inflammatory response postoperatively compared to standard BPVC, indicated by significantly lower levels of pro-inflammatory markers at 24 and 48 hours postinjection with BPVC. However, by 72 hours, inflammatory markers did not differ significantly between Lip-BPVC and BPVC groups. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of surgery duration, extubation time, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, or incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Conclusions: Lip-BPVC initially increased inflammatory markers postoperatively, but levels were comparable to BPVC by 72 hours. It provided superior pain control and reduced opioid use compared to standard BPVC in CABG patients, with similar safety and recovery outcomes.

Content from these authors
© 2025 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top