Annals of Vascular Diseases
Online ISSN : 1881-6428
Print ISSN : 1881-641X
ISSN-L : 1881-641X

この記事には本公開記事があります。本公開記事を参照してください。
引用する場合も本公開記事を引用してください。

Examination of Difference in the Proximal AnastomoticSite for Crus, Ankle Bypass: Common Femoral Artery vs Below the Knee Popliteal Artery
Takashi ShibuyaTakashi ShinntaniSeiji EdogawaHisashi Satoh, md, phd
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー 早期公開

論文ID: oa.10.00007

この記事には本公開記事があります。
詳細
抄録
Objective: We evaluated the outcomes of bypass surgery for revascularization in cases of critical limb ischemia with the distal anastomotic site at or below the ankle; we focused on the differences in outcomes between 2 groups having different proximal anastomotic sites.
Patients and Methods: Out of 270 cases diagnosed with critical limb ischemia from January 2003 to October 2009, bypass surgeries with the distal anastomotic site at or below the ankle were performed on the limbs of 69 patients (75 limbs). These cases were classified on the basis of the proximal anastomotic sites: group F (n = 50) where the common femoral artery was the proximal anastomotic site and group P (n = 25) where the below-knee popliteal artery was the site.
Results: The 5-year cumulative primary/secondary patency rates were 69.3%/81.8% for group F and 68.7%/84.9% for group P. The 5-year cumulative limb salvage rate was 97.9% in group F and 80.3% in group P.
Conclusion: Among the cases reviewed, results were comparable between cases with the proximal anastomotic site at the below-knee popliteal artery and those with the site at the common femoral artery.
著者関連情報
© 2011 Annals of Vascular Diseases

この記事はクリエイティブ・コモンズ [表示 - 非営利 - 継承 4.0 国際]ライセンスの下に提供されています。
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.ja
feedback
Top