2015 Volume 79 Issue 11 Pages 2520-
The authors apologize for an error in the median proportion of TTR for INR 1.5–2.5 in the UFH/warfarin group. Corrections are shown below.
1) Page 1230, abstract, lines 10–11
Incorrect:
Proportion of major/clinically relevant non-major bleeding was lower in apixaban (7.5%) compared with well-controlled UFH/warfarin (28.2%; median TTR, 70.1%).
Correct:
Proportion of major/clinically relevant non-major bleeding was lower in apixaban (7.5%) compared with well-controlled UFH/warfarin (28.2%; median TTR, 70.4%).
2) Page 1232, right column, lines 18–19
Incorrect:
In the UFH/warfarin group, the median proportion of TTR for INR 1.5–2.5 was 70.1%.
Correct:
In the UFH/warfarin group, the median proportion of TTR for INR 1.5–2.5 was 70.4%.
3) Page 1235, “discussion” section in left column, lines 12–17
Incorrect:
Important findings of the study are that apixaban was well-tolerated, had a favorable safety profile, and no clinically important difference in efficacy was observed, compared with well-controlled standard of care; UFH/warfarin had median TTR 70.1% for the recommended INR range in the Japan VTE treatment guideline.
Correct:
Important findings of the study are that apixaban was well-tolerated, had a favorable safety profile, and no clinically important difference in efficacy was observed, compared with well-controlled standard of care; UFH/warfarin had median TTR 70.4% for the recommended INR range in the Japan VTE treatment guideline.