2021 Volume 85 Issue 10 Pages 1731-1734
Researchers in the MONICA study attempted to answer the question of whether differences in the incidence rate of coronary artery disease (CAD) existed between countries by using the unified criteria of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and by evaluating the age-adjusted incidence rates using the WHO standard population.1 They found very high incidence rates of first-ever AMI in Finland (600 per 100,000 person-years in males) and very low rates in China (<100 per 100,000 person-years in males). Unfortunately, data for Japan were not included in the study and Professor Ueshima later added it (based on Isomura’s report2) to the results of the MONICA project and low incidence rates of AMI in Japan were revealed.3 However, these data were obtained more than 20 years ago and the current age distributions are very different from that time.
Article p 1722
Japan is the most rapidly aging country in the world and the proportion of elderly people is very high. There should be a relatively large number of elderly people with AMI in Japan now; however, most previous studies in Japan have only addressed age-adjusted incidence rates of AMI or provided age-specific incidence rates of AMI only in middle-aged people (shown in the Supplementary Table). Thus, it would be interesting to know the incidence rates of CAD in all age categories, but there have been very few studies that provided age-specific incidence rates of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or AMI, probably due to difficulties in conducting appropriate studies on age-specific incidence rates of CAD. Nielsen et al described 4 methodological problems for the determination of the incidence rate of ACS: (1) selection biases of the patients included in the study, (2) lack of identification and control of the background population, (3) uncertainties and inconsistencies in the use of diagnostic criteria, and (4) missing data.4
Table 1 shows studies conducted in Western countries that provided comprehensive age-specific incidence rates of CAD (AMI, ACS with/without sudden cardiac death (SCD)).4–6 Both the prospective study in Demark4 and the comprehensive registry study in Canada6 provided similar age-specific incidence rates of AMI in middle-aged people and these incidence rates are also similar to the incidence rates in Western European nations in the WHO MONICA project.1 On the other hand, Canadian researchers showed very high incidence rates of inhospital AMI in elderly people, both female (1,009.6 per 100,000 person-years) and male (1,509.4 per 100,000 person-years).6
Study name (published year) Reference |
Study design | Analytical method |
Subjects | Outcomes | Age-specific incidence rates (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Göteborg/Sweden (1997)5 |
The Myocardial Infarction Register in Göteborg (n=450,000 inhabitants) Non-fatal AMI in hospital records SCD among all persons living in Göteborg, Sweden, aged 35–64 years were included |
Age-specific crude incidence rates |
Women 35–44 years old | The MONICA criteria: non-fatal AMI + fatal AMI |
14 |
Women 45–54 years old | 55 | ||||
Women 55–64 years old | 194 | ||||
Age-specific crude incidence rates |
Men 35–44 years old | The MONICA criteria: non-fatal AMI + fatal AMI |
62 | ||
Men 45–54 years old | 272 | ||||
Men 55–64 years old | 687 | ||||
Aarhus/Denmark (2007)4 |
Prospective cohort of residents of the municipality of Aarhus, Denmark, aged 30–69 years (n=138,290) Observation period: April 2000 to March 2002 |
Age-specific crude incidence rates |
Women 30–39 years old | Definite AMI + unstable angina + SCD |
25 |
Women 40–49 years old | 73 | ||||
Women 50–59 years old | 157 | ||||
Women 60–69 years old | 437 | ||||
Women age-adjusted 30–69 years old |
137 | ||||
Age-specific crude incidence rates |
Men 30–39 years old | Definite AMI + unstable angina + SCD |
39 | ||
Men 40–49 years old | 156 | ||||
Men 50–59 years old | 472 | ||||
Men 60–69 years old | 1,106 | ||||
Men age-adjusted 30–69 years old |
331 | ||||
Canadian Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (2009)6 |
(1) Annual Canadian Mortality Database (n=18,102, 2,004 death certificates) (2) Canadian Institute for Health Information’s Hospital Morbidity Database (n=56,759, 2,004 inhospital records) (n=180,102 inhospital patients and death certificates) Observation period: 1994–2004 |
Crude annual incidence rate (per 100,000 person-years) = total annual no. of cases of AMI as numerator/ annual population of Canada National Census as denominator Direct age-adjustment was performed using the 1991 Canadian population census as the standard |
Women 20–49 years old | Death certificates (D) + inhospital records of patients with AMI (H) |
1.4 (death); 15.7 (inhospital) |
Women 50–64 years old | 18.6 (D); 125.4 (H) | ||||
Women 65–74 years old | 90.6 (D); 374.8 (H) | ||||
Women ≥75 years old | 524.5 (D); 1,009.6 (H) | ||||
Women overall | 64.2 (D) | ||||
Men 20–49 years old | Death certificates (D) + inhospital records of patients with AMI (H) |
7.2 (D); 66.9 (H) | |||
Men 50–64 years old | 69.6 (D); 422.2 (H) | ||||
Men 65–74 years old | 212.2 (D); 764.3 (H) | ||||
Men ≥75 years old | 743.9 (D); 1,509.4 (H) | ||||
Men overall | 86.7 (D) |
ACS, acute coronary syndrome; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; SCD, sudden cardiac death.
Table 2 shows studies that provided age-specific incidence rates of CAD in Japan, including 2 prospective cohort studies,7,8 a multihospital-based registry study,9 and 2 population-based registry studies.10,11 The incidence rates in middle-aged individuals in the 2 prospective cohort studies10,11 were higher than the rates in the report by Isomura.2 Age-specific incidence rates in elderly people in the JMS cohort,8 Takashima AMI registry10 and Northern Iwate Registry11 were similar, but the rates in the Yamagata AMI registry9 were lower than in those studies. Collecting patients’ data from tertiary referral hospitals would definitely contribute to a selection bias. Very old patients and patients with very serious conditions such as malnutrition are not likely to be transported to the tertiary referral hospitals because of their very low chance of recovery. Moreover, cases of SCD attributable to ACS were not included in the Yamagata registry.9 These might be reasons for the underestimation of incidence rates, especially in elderly people. Although prospective studies can provide reliable data for the incidence rates of CAD, the study design requires a large-scale sample and an observation period of 10 years or longer.
Study name (published year) Reference |
Study design | Analytical method |
Subjects | Outcomes | Age-specific incidence rates (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hiroshima/Nagasaki study (1990)7 |
Hiroshima and Nagasaki Prefecture prospective cohorts Observation period: 1958–1984 (n=20,141) 360 cases of AMI (definite and possible) |
Average age- adjustment was performed using the age distribution of the cohort study |
Women 30–39 years old | The MONICA criteria: definite and probable AMI not including SCD |
0.3 |
Women 40–49 years old | 8.7 | ||||
Women 50–59 years old | 30.9 | ||||
Women 60–69 years old | 132.2 | ||||
Women 70–79 years old | 345.7 | ||||
Women ≥80 years old | 557.2 | ||||
Women age-adjusted | 78.8 | ||||
Men 30–39 years old | The MONICA criteria: definite and probable AMI not including SCD |
5.1 | |||
Men 40–49 years old | 34.8 | ||||
Men 50–59 years old | 136.1 | ||||
Men 60–69 years old | 419.1 | ||||
Men 70–79 years old | 683.4 | ||||
Men ≥80 years old | 908.7 | ||||
Men age-adjusted | 204.9 | ||||
JMS cohort (2008)8 | 12 areas and area-related rural hospital-based prospective cohorts 10.7 years follow-up period (1992–) (n=12,490) inhospital records (n=92 consecutive patients with 1 st-ever AMI) not including SCD |
Direct age-adjustment was performed using the 1985 Japan population census as the standard |
Women ≤39 years old | The MONICA criteria Inhospital records of patients with AMI not including SCD |
0.0 |
Women 40–49 years old | 0.0 | ||||
Women 50–59 years old | 25.5 | ||||
Women 60–69 years old | 45.8 | ||||
Women ≥70 years old | 217.1 | ||||
Women age-adjusted | 34.2 | ||||
Men ≤39 years old | The MONICA criteria Inhospital records of patients with AMI not including SCD |
19.1 | |||
Men 40–49 years old | 16.8 | ||||
Men 50–59 years old | 80.2 | ||||
Men 60–69 years old | 202.1 | ||||
Men ≥70 years old | 424.3 | ||||
Men age-adjusted | 123.7 | ||||
Yamagata (2016)9 | Multicenter-hospital-based Inhospital records (n=5,325 consecutive patients with 1 st-ever AMI not including cardiac death) Study period: 1994–2010 |
Crude annual incidence rate (per 100,000 person- years) = total annual no. of cases of AMI as numerator/annual population of each area as denominator Direct age-adjustment was performed using the 2005 Japan population census as the standard |
Women ≤64 years old | The MONICA criteria Inhospital records of patients with AMI not including SCD |
4.0 (3.5–4.6) |
Women 65–74 years old | 44.1 (39.3–49.1) |
||||
Women ≥75 years old | 101.1 (92.2–110.0) |
||||
Women age-adjusted | 20.3 (18.4–22.3) |
||||
Men ≤64 years old | The MONICA criteria Inhospital records of patients with AMI not including SCD |
23.4 (21.5–25.3) |
|||
Men 65–74 years old | 131.1 (122.0–140.1) |
||||
Men ≥75 years old | 178.1 (162.8–193.4) |
||||
Men age-adjusted | 45.6 (43.1–48.1) |
||||
Takashima (2008)10 | Population-based, data from all hospitals (3 hospitals inside the area and a Shiga University Hospital), county ambulance records and county death certificates (cross-checked by epidemiologists and cardiologists) were certificated by epidemiologists in Shiga University of Medical Science (total population=55,451; census 2000) Observation period: 1990–2001 |
Crude annual incidence rate (per 100,000 person- years) = total annual number of cases of AMI as numerator/ annual population of the study area as denominator |
Women 45–54 years old | The MONICA criteria: definite AMI including SCD |
0 |
Women 55–64 years old | 27.2 (7.4–71.9) |
||||
Women 65–74 years old | 78.7 (34.9–154.1) |
||||
Women 75–84 years old | 92.2 (34.7–201.2) |
||||
Women ≥85 years old | 121.5 (22.9–381.2) |
||||
Men ≤35 years old | The MONICA criteria: definite AMI including SCD |
2.9 (0.2–12.6) |
|||
Men 35–44 years old | 33.9 (11.2–80.2) |
||||
Men 45–54 years old | 88.2 (41.5–166.1) |
||||
Men 55–64 years old | 84.1 (41.4–153.2) |
||||
Men 65–74 years old | 135.4 (66.7–246.8) |
||||
Men 75–84 years old | 283.8 (145.5–503.0) |
||||
Men ≥85 years old | 428.6 (115.9–1,131.2) |
||||
Iwate (2017)11 | Population-based, data from all hospitals with a catheterization laboratory (2 hospitals (Kuji and Ninohe prefectural hospitals) inside the study area and Iwate Medical University Hospital, Hachinohe Redcross Hospital, Hachinohe Municipal Hospital and Aomori Rosai Hospital) and small hospitals and clinics (4 institutes) were certificated by epidemiologists in Iwate Medical University (total population=116,004; census 2014) Observation period: 2012–2014 |
Crude annual incidence rate (per 100,000 person- years) = total annual number of cases of AMI as numerator/ annual population of the study area as denominator |
Women 30–39 years old | The MONICA criteria: definite AMI including SCD |
5.7 (1.9–12.3) |
Women 40–49 years old | 4.7 (1.3–10.9) |
||||
Women 50–59 years old | 11.8 (5.8–20.3) |
||||
Women 60–69 years old | 24.4 (15.3–35.7) |
||||
Women 70–79 years old | 67.5 (52.3–85.6) |
||||
Women 80–89 years old | 204.5 (177.4–234.5) |
||||
Men 30–39 years old | The MONICA criteria: definite AMI including SCD |
11.2 (5.4–19.6) |
|||
Men 40–49 years old | 56.4 (42.3–72.7) |
||||
Men 50–59 years old | 78.3 (61.6–97.3) |
||||
Men 60–69 years old | 146.4 (123.2–171.6) |
||||
Men 70–79 years old | 239.5 (210.1–271.8) |
||||
Men 80–89 years old | 420.2 (380.7–462.1) |
ACS, acute coronary syndrome; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; SCD, sudden cardiac death.
In an inventory survey of CAD, the most formidable challenge is how to handle SCD. Because it has been shown that CAD accounts for more than 75% of the total number of SCDs,12 much effort was made in previous studies to recruit patients with AMI who died out of hospital. Researchers in the Takashima AMI registry10 and Northern Iwate Heart Disease registry11 consisted of not only cardiologists but also epidemiologists and the collaboration of these 2 teams almost completed inventory surveys including SCD, whereas tertiary referral hospital-based registries such as the Yamagata AMI registry9 and the Miyagi AMI registry13 showed relatively low incidence rates probably due to underestimation. Researchers in the Yamagata AMI registry recently published a study that addressed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).14 Surprisingly, they showed that more than 50% of the total cases of AMI were attributed to OHCA. If they re-estimated the age-specific incidence rates of AMI using data that included cases of OHCA, the results would be different from the previously published data.
In this issue of the Journal, Ogata et al15 report on their attempt to reveal accurate age-specific incidence rates of AMI and ACS including SCD by bringing together cardiologists and epidemiologists. They show not only comprehensive age-specific incidence rates of AMI, but also age-specific incidence rates of ACS, including fatal/non-fatal AMI, unstable angina and SCD. They utilized data from the Nobeoka Medical Control Consultative Committee for Emergency Transportation and found cases of highly suspected CAD-related SCD among cases of OHCA. This achievement should be warmly praised.
However, all the studies (Takashima, Iwate and Nobeoka) were conducted in rural areas and there have been no studies on age-specific incidence rates of CAD in urban areas of Japan. We hope that a further collaboration of cardiologists and epidemiologist will conduct a complete inventory survey in an urban area of Japan. That team would certainly give us a special gift.
None declared.
Please find supplementary file(s);
http://dx.doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0502