2021 Volume 85 Issue 10 Pages 1849-1850
Resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is one of the remaining challenges in emergency cardiovascular medicine. Approximately 1 million people in Japan suffered from OHCA during 2005–2013, of which approximately 55% of the patients had cardiac disease, and approximately 4% of the patients had experienced a witnessed ventricular fibrillation (VF).1 Among those patients with witnessed VF, the proportion of patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was 31.4%, and the proportion of patients with survival with favorable neurological outcome, defined as a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1 (good performance) or 2 (moderate disability) on a 5-category scale,2 was 20.3%, for which increasing application of public-access defibrillators in Japan has contributed to the improvement in the chance of ROSC.1
Article p 1842
Based on the efforts of resuscitation by basic life support in the pre- and in-hospital settings, patients with ROSC are further treated by advanced life support (ALS). Among patients with cardiovascular shock admitted to a cardiovascular center in Japan, OHCA before hospital arrival is a strong predictor of poor neurological outcome.3–5 This situation drives research attempts to improve post-resuscitation care. The ILCOR (International Liaison Committee On Resuscitation) and its member associations, including the Japan Resuscitation Council (JRC), have published the results of systematic reviews and guidelines on ALS for patients’ resuscitation from cardiac arrest,6–8 including post-resuscitation care that comprises a multidisciplinary approach: (1) targeted temperature management (TTM), (2) optimization of hemodynamics and ventilation, (3) percutaneous coronary intervention, and (4) neurological assessment and care.
The ILCOR Consensus on Science and Treatment Recommendation published in 2015 and 2020 recommends TTM between 32℃ and 36℃ as opposed to no TTM for adults with OHCA with or without an initial shockable rhythm who remain unresponsive after ROSC; however, the level of evidence is low.6,7 The JRC guideline 2020 identifies several clinical questions regarding an optimal TTM protocol that remain to be answered: (1) optimal target core temperature, (2) optimal duration, (3) optimal timing of TTM induction, (4) clinical benefit of prehospital induction of TTM, and (5) optimal cooling technique.8 Because the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCT) is limited, findings from observational studies are of importance in this area.
In this issue of the Journal, Matsuzaki et al9 examine the association of neurological outcome with the induction of hypothermia by an infusion of cold saline among OHCA patients registered in the J-PULSE-HYPO study registry. The J-PULSE-HYPO study10,11 was a multicenter voluntary registry of OHCA patients with post-resuscitation neurological dysfunction in Japan. Matsuzaki et al stratified OHCA patients with collapse-to-ROSC time, a significant factor of prognosis,11 and found that among the patients with collapse-to-ROSC time ≥18 min, rapid cooling with ice-cold saline infusion followed by standard cooling (e.g., surface cooling or direct blood cooling) was associated with shorter time from collapse to the initiation of cooling and to the attainment of 34℃ compared with standard cooling alone, and importantly, with a higher probability of 30-day favorable neurological outcome (Figure), in contrast to the patients with collapse-to-ROSC time <18 min in whom rapid cooling was not associated with neurological outcome.
Central findings from the J-PULSE-HYPO study. (A) Rapid cooling with ice-cold saline infusion followed by standard cooling (e.g., surface cooling or direct blood cooling) was associated with shorter time from collapse to the initiation of cooling and to the attainment of 34℃ compared with standard cooling alone among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with collapse-to-return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) time ≥18 min. (B) Rapid cooling with ice-cold saline infusion followed by standard cooling was associated with larger probability of favorable neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category ≤2) compared with standard cooling alone.
Very recently, awaited results of the TTM2 trial, an RCT that compared targeted hypothermia at 33℃ with targeted normothermia among 1,900 patients in a coma after OHCA, has been published, in which targeted hypothermia did not show differences with respect to death and neurological function.12 In the TTM2 trial, median time from collapse to ROSC was 25 min, and the median time from collapse to randomization that preceded the initiation of hypothermia was 135 min. Although the TTM2 trial has been assumed to significantly affect the body of evidence regarding the target temperature during TTM,7,8 there remain several questions to be addressed. The current observational study by Matsuzaki et al may provide clinical hypotheses that there is a therapeutic window for TTM depending on the time from collapse to ROSC, and that earlier initiation of hypothermia may have benefit regarding neurological outcomes (Figure), which should be clarified by larger, prospective and interventional studies.
In conclusion, post-resuscitation care is receiving increasing attention in cardiovascular medicine to obtain better likelihood of survival with good neurological outcome in patients with OHCA. Although current guidelines recommend TTM, pursuit of the optimal protocol of TTM still continues through trials to answer several clinical questions.
H.T. is an Editorial Member of Circulation Journal.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this editorial comment.
None.