Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843

This article has now been updated. Please use the final version.

Trends in Unplanned Admissions of Patients With Adult Congenital Heart Disease Based on the Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases-Diagnosis Procedure Combination Study
Ayako KuraokaTomoko Ishizu Michikazu NakaiYoko SumitaNaoto KawamatsuTomoko Machino-OhtsukaKeita MasudaMasaki Ieda
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML Advance online publication

Article ID: CJ-23-0015

Details
Abstract

Background: The prevalence of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) is increasing rapidly and in particular, patients who underwent complicated surgeries are reaching their youth and middle age. Therefore, the need for ACHD treatment will increase, but the current medical situation is unknown. In this study we assessed trends in unplanned admissions in patients with ACHD in Japan.

Methods and Results: From the Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases-Diagnosis Procedure Combination, a nationwide claim-based database, we selected patients aged >15 years with CHD defined by the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes. We identified 39,676 admissions between April 2012 and March 2018; 10,444 (26.3%) were unplanned. Main diagnoses were categorized into 3 degrees of complexity (severe, moderate, and mild) and other. Among unplanned admissions, the proportion of the severe group increased with time. Patients in the mild group were significantly older than those in the moderate and severe groups (median age: 70.0, 39.0, and 32.0 years, respectively). There were 765 deaths during hospitalization (overall mortality rate, 7.3%). The odds ratio of death during admission was significantly higher in patients aged >50 years, especially in the moderate group.

Conclusions: Patients with moderate or severe ACHD tended to experience unplanned admissions at a younger age. In anticipation of greater numbers of new, severe patients, we need to prepare for their increasing medical demands.

Currently, most children born with congenital heart disease (CHD) will survive and reach adulthood. CHD includes various anatomical and physiological characteristics, even in the same diagnosis. The population of adults with CHD (ACHD) has dramatically increased with surgical improvements and in addition to the variations in CHD, ACHD status is determined by surgical status such as unrepair, repair or palliation. This heterogeneity makes it difficult to completely understand ACHD as a whole. Furthermore, surgical repair in childhood does not mean a complete cure; hence, many patients with ACHD may have varied, often unrecognized, complications.1

With the growing importance of ACHD, relatively large clinical reports have been published.24 According to these, the frequency of admission due to heart failure and other problems is high, even in the young population and in patients with mild forms of CHD. The distribution of severity and complexity may keep changing with age and medical advances. In the past 50 years, there have been considerable improvements and innovations in both diagnosis and treatment of CHD, but most occurred in the past 30–40 years, especially for severe CHD, such as that affecting a single ventricle (SV). Therefore, at present, more of the patients with severe CHD are surviving into adulthood.

In this study, we aimed to determine the trends in unplanned admissions among ACHD patients, which is considered one of the major adverse cardiovascular events in cardiac disease research.5

Methods

Ethical Approval

The present study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tsukuba University (No. 1543). The need for informed consent was waived because information specific to individuals was not included.

Study Population

This retrospective, observational cohort study was based on the Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases-Diagnosis Procedure Combination (JROAD-DPC) database, details of which have been described previously.6,7 Briefly, the JROAD-DPC is a nationwide registry of information on admissions and discharges for cardiovascular diseases, clinical examination and treatment status, patient status, and hospital overviews. A validation study showed an acceptable concordance rate between registry and clinical data.8

We obtained the data of patients who were admitted and discharged between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2018 through identification based on the diagnosis codes of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10). Patients aged >15 years who had ICD-10 codes associated with CHD (Q200–269) as the main diagnosis, the admission-precipitating diagnosis, most resource-consuming diagnosis, and second most resource-consuming diagnosis were identified. We excluded patients who represented the normal variant and appeared to be mistaken for having acquired heart disease; to do so, we used the ICD-10 codes as well as detailed diagnosis information written in Japanese. Admissions were categorized as planned or unplanned.

Diagnostic Criteria and Definitions

We determined 19 main diagnoses referring to the registration system of Japanese ACHD. Each main diagnosis contains multiple allied diseases, so we finally decided the main diagnosis of each admission using the detailed Japanese disease name (Table 1). We assigned each patient 1 main diagnosis, and if there were >2 diagnoses at readmission, the main diagnosis was determined based on the doctor’s confirmation. All analyses were conducted using a record-base, even if a patient was admitted multiple times. Comorbidities and pharmacological therapy were defined based on the medication intake and procedures that each patient underwent during admission. We categorized the 19 disease groups into 3 degrees of complexity (severe, moderate, and mild) and others. The others group contained multiple diseases with difficult to determine severity because of their rarity and high variety.

Table 1.

Hierarchy of Diagnosis and Classification of Complexity

Complexity CHD ICD-10 code No. of admissions No. of unplanned
admissions
Severe SV Q204, 224, 226, 232, 234, 248 2,982 (7.5%) 1,048 (10.0%)
PA-IVS Q220, 255 66 (0.2%) 21 (0.2%)
PTA Q200 248 (0.6%) 69 (0.7%)
TGA Q203 1,070 (2.7%) 259 (2.5%)
cTGA Q205 978 (2.5%) 331 (3.2%)
Moderate PA-VSD Q213 440 (1.1%) 123 (1.2%)
TOF Q213 3,288 (8.3%) 1,037 (9.9%)
TAPVR Q262 179 (0.5%) 36 (0.3%)
AVSD Q212 901 (2.3%) 312 (3.0%)
Ebstein Q225 578 (1.5%) 180 (1.7%)
CoA Q251 492 (1.2%) 91 (0.9%)
DORV Q201 746 (1.9%) 275 (2.6%)
Mild VSD Q210 4,411 (11.1%) 1,344 (12.9%)
ASD Q211 14,765 (37.2%) 3,063 (29.3%)
PDA Q250 1,089 (2.7%) 272 (2.6%)
Other PS Q221, 256 661 (1.7%) 84 (0.8%)
AS Q230 450 (1.1%) 114 (1.1%)
BAV Q231 1,482 (3.7%) 252 (2.4%)
MV disease Q232, 233, 238 219 (0.6%) 105 (1.0%)
PFO Q211 1,437 (3.6%) 590 (5.6%)
Other Other than those listed above 3,194 (8.1%) 838 (8.0%)

AS, aortic stenosis; ASD, atrial septal defect; AVSD, atrioventricular septal defect; BAV, bicuspid aortic valve; CHD, congenital heart disease; CoA, coarctation of the aorta; cTGA, corrected transposition of the great artery; DORV, double-outlet right ventricle; ICD-10, International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision; MV, mitral valve; PA-IVS, pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum; PA-VSD, pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; PS, pulmonary stenosis; PTA, persistent truncus arteriosus; PFO, patent foramen ovale; SV, single ventricle; TAPVR, total anomalous pulmonary venous return; TGA, complete transposition of the great arteries; TOF, tetralogy of Fallot; VSD, ventricular septal defect.

Statistical Analysis

Data on the diagnosis and complexity, as well as other categorical data, are shown as frequencies and percentages and were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Continuous data are expressed as the median and interquartile range (IQR) and were compared using the Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Multiple comparison tests were performed using Dunnett’s test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was also performed to evaluate yearly changes in the number of admissions. Multilevel univariate and multivariate mixed-effect logistic regression analyses with the institute as a random intercept were used to assess the risk of death during unplanned admissions. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. All analyses were conducted using STATA 16.1 (STATA Corp., College Station, TX, USA).

Results

We identified 43,678 admissions of patients aged >15 years with ACHD associated with the ICD-10 codes Q200–269 between April 2012 and March 2018 (Figure 1). Patients with ICD-10 codes representing normal variants, such as a persistent left superior vena cava (Q261), or were obviously mistaken to have acquired heart disease or had wrongly inputted data were excluded. Finally, 39,676 admissions (27,817 patients) were included in this study.

Figure 1.

Flow diagram of the selection process for the study population. ACHD, adult congenital heart disease; ICD-10, International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision; JROAD-DPC, Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases-Diagnosis Procedure Combination.

The JROAD-DPC database expanded during the study period; as a result, the number of hospitals and admissions increased. Therefore, the accurate number of admissions was unclear. The mean ratio of ACHD-related admission to all JROAD-DPC admissions for each year was 0.60%, and there was no significant yearly trend. Of the total of 39,676 admissions, 10,444 (26.3%) were unplanned and this ratio did not change significantly during the study period.

The classification of diagnosis and complexity is shown in Table 1. The average number of unplanned admissions per person was 1.22 in the mild group, 1.47 in the moderate group, and 1.78 in the severe group. The percentage of cases in the severe group significantly increased from 16.8% in 2012 to 22.4% in 2017 (P<0.001) (Figure 2). There were different peaks of admissions in each age group. The severe group peaked in their 20s, the moderate group in their 30s, and the mild group in their 80 s (Figure 3A). The ratio of deaths during unplanned admissions was high in the moderate group among patients aged >60 years (Figure 3B).

Figure 2.

Trends in the complexity distribution from 2012 to 2017.

Figure 3.

Trends in the age distribution by complexity group. (A) Number of unplanned admissions, (B) rate of death during unplanned admissions.

The characteristics of patients with unplanned admissions are shown in Table 2. The median age was 57.0 years (34.0–75.0 years), and 50.8% were male. Patients in the mild group were significantly older than those in the moderate and severe groups. There were no difference in length of hospital stay in each group. Heart failure and arrhythmia were the common comorbidities; the former was relatively more commonly observed in patients with mild disease and the latter in those with moderate and severe disease.

Table 2.

Characteristics of Patients (Unplanned Admissions)

Characteristic All Mild Moderate Severe Others P value
No. of admissions 10,444 4,679 (44.8%) 2,054 (19.7%) 1,728 (16.5%) 1,983 (19.0%)
Median age (years, IQR) 57.0 (34.0–75.0) 70.0 (53.0–81.0) 39.0 (29.0–57.0)* 32.0 (23.0–42.0)* 62.0 (43.0–76.0)* <0.001
Age ≥50 years 5,919 (56.7%) 3,635 (77.7%) 679 (33.1%)* 271 (15.7%)* 1,334 (67.3%)* <0.001
Age <50 years 4,525 (43.3%) 1,044 (22.3%) 1,375 (66.9%)* 1,457 (84.3%)* 649 (32.7%)* <0.001
Male 5,304 (50.8%) 2,002 (42.8%) 1,004 (48.9%)* 970 (56.1%)* 1,128 (56.9%)* <0.001
NYHA III or IV 3,129 (7.9%) 1,189 (25.4%) 423 (20.6%)* 292 (16.9%)* 242 (12.2%)* <0.001
Length of hospital stay 14 (7–25) 16 (9–27) 11 (5–22) 10 (4–19) 15 (8–27) <0.001
Death during hospitalization 765 (7.3%) 399 (8.5%) 153 (7.5%) 81 (4.7%)* 132 (6.7%)* <0.001
Age at death (years, IQR) 69.0 (45.0–80.0) 77.0 (65.0–84.0) 53.0 (38.0–69.0)* 37.0 (27.0–59.0)* 70.5 (47.0–80.5)* <0.001
Comorbidities
 Heart failure 4,095 (39.2%) 2,267 (48.5%) 800 (39.0%)* 543 (31.4%)* 485 (24.5%)* <0.001
 Arrhythmia 2,472 (23.7%) 673 (14.4%) 487 (23.7%)* 428 (24.8%)* 884 (44.6%)* <0.001
 Hemorrhage 918 (8.8%) 351 (7.5%) 217 (10.6%)* 220 (12.7%)* 130 (6.6%) <0.001
 Cerebrovascular 918 (8.8%) 338 (7.2%) 48 (2.3%)* 61 (3.5%)* 471 (23.8%)* <0.001
 Pulmonary hypertension 753 (7.2%) 376 (8.0%) 136 (6.6%)* 162 (9.4%) 79 (4.0%)* <0.001
 Hepatic failure 605 (5.8%) 306 (6.5%) 125 (6.1%) 90 (5.2%)* 84 (4.2%)* 0.002
 Renal disease 541 (5.2%) 284 (6.1%) 105 (5.1%) 73 (4.2%)* 79 (4.0%)* <0.001
 Cancer 430 (4.1%) 223 (5.0%) 49 (2.4%)* 50 (2.9%)* 108 (5.4%) <0.001
 Endocarditis 357 (3.4%) 153 (3.3%) 71 (3.5%) 36 (2.1%)* 97 (4.9%)* <0.001
 Sepsis 184 (1.8%) 82 (1.8%) 42 (2.0%) 23 (1.3%) 37 (1.9%) 0.40
 Acute coronary syndrome 281 (2.7%) 171 (3.7%) 9 (0.4%)* 10 (0.6%)* 91 (4.59%) <0.001
 Aortic dissection 145 (1.4%) 48 (1.0%) 9 (0.4%)* 3 (0.2%)* 85 (4.3%)* <0.001
Non-pharmacological therapy
 Ventilation management 1,822 (17.5%) 817 (17.46%) 325 (15.82%) 209 (12.09%) 471 (23.75%) <0.001
 Hemodialysis 183 (1.8%) 90 (1.92%) 32 (1.56%) 17 (0.9%) 44 (2.22%) 0.021
 Cardiac surgery 906 (8.67%) 386 (8.25%) 74 (3.60%)* 49 (2.84%)* 397 (20.02%)* <0.001
 Intervention 324 (3.10%) 152 (3.25%) 70 (3.41%) 36 (2.08%)* 66 (3.33%) 0.064
 Ablation 181 (1.73%) 68 (1.45%) 64 (3.12%)* 34 (1.97%) 15 (0.76%)* <0.001
 PMI/ICD/CRT 292 (2.80%) 149 (3.18%) 60 (2.92%) 41 (2.37%) 42 (2.12%)* 0.066
 PCPS 89 (0.85%) 24 (0.51%) 16 (0.78%) 14 (0.81%) 35 (1.77%)* <0.001
 IABP 119 (1.10%) 47 (1.00%) 17 (0.83%) 9 (0.52%) 46 (2.32%) <0.001
 VAD 1 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (0.05%) 0.23
 Transplantation 1 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (0.06%) 0 (0.00%) 0.17
Pharmacological therapy (intravenous)
 Catecholamine 2,221 (21.3%) 1,026 (21.93%) 374 (18.21%) 257 (14.87%) 564 (28.44%) <0.001
 Antiarrhythmic 2,022 (19.4%) 895 (19.13%) 342 (16.65%) 244 (14.12%) 541 (27.28%) <0.001
 Diuretics 4,198 (40.2%) 2,161 (46.19%) 703 (34.23%) 593 (34.32%) 741 (37.37%) <0.001
Pharmacological therapy (oral)
 Antiarrhythmic 3,811 (36.50%) 1,643 (35.11%) 819 (39.87%) 716 (41.44%) 633 (31.92%) <0.001
 ACEi/ARB 3,702 (35.45%) 1,659 (35.46%) 633 (30.82%)* 717 (41.49%)* 693 (34.95%) <0.001
 β-blocker 4,147 (39.71%) 1,796 (38.38%) 807 (39.29%) 770 (44.56%)* 774 (39.03%) <0.001
 MRA 2,872 (27.50%) 1,307 (27.93%) 587 (28.58%) 540 (31.25%)* 438 (22.09%)* <0.001
 Loop diuretic 6,098 (58.39%) 2,908 (62.15%) 1,181 (57.50%)* 1,045 (60.47%) 964 (48.61%)* <0.001

*P<0.05 vs. mild severity group. ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; CRT, cardiac resynchronization therapy; IABP, intra-aortic balloon pumping; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; IQR, interquartile range; MRA, mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonist; NYHA, New York Heart Association; PCPS, percutaneous cardiopulmonary support; PMI, pacemaker implantation; VAD, ventricular assist device.

There were 765 deaths (7.3%) during admission. The number and percentage of deaths were 399 (8.5%), 153 (7.5%), and 81 (4.7%) in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. Among patients aged >50 years, the percentage of deaths was 9.5% in the mild group, 11.8% in the moderate group, and 8.5% in the severe group. Multilevel mixed-effect logistic regression analysis showed that, compared with patients in the mild group aged <50 years, the odds ratio of death during admission was significantly higher in patients aged >50 years in each group, especially those in the moderate group (Table 3). In addition to age and severity, New York Heart Association scores of III and IV, heart failure, hemorrhage, cerebrovascular, sepsis, and aortic dissection were associated with poor prognosis.

Table 3.

Multilevel Mixed-Effect Logistic Regression Model for Assessing Death During Unplanned Hospitalization

Variable Univariate Multivariate
OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
Mild with age <50 1.00   1.00  
Mild with age ≥50 1.82 (1.35, 2.46) <0.001 1.62 (1.17, 2.25) 0.004
Moderate with age <50 1.15 (0.79, 1.66) 0.471 1.07 (0.72, 1.58) 0.738
Moderate with age ≥50 2.56 (1.77, 3.72) <0.001 2.06 (1.38, 3.07) <0.001
Severe with age <50 0.86 (0.58, 1.28) 0.464 0.72 (0.48, 1.09) 0.124
Severe with age ≥50 1.76 (1.04, 2.96) 0.035 1.59 (0.92, 2.75) 0.099
Sex 0.96 (0.81, 1.13) 0.615 0.91 (0.76, 1.08) 0.271
NYHA III or IV 1.92 (1.60, 2.30) <0.001 1.57 (1.27, 1.94) <0.001
Length of hospital stay 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) 0.239 0.99 (0.98, 0.99) <0.001
Heart failure 1.71 (1.44, 2.03) <0.001 1.48 (1.19, 1.84) <0.001
Arrhythmia 0.79 (0.63, 1.00) 0.053 1.16 (0.90, 1.49) 0.258
Hemorrhage 5.34 (4.30, 6.62) <0.001 5.35 (4.24, 6.76) <0.001
Cerebrovascular 1.05 (0.74, 1.49) 0.788 1.62 (1.11, 2.36) 0.012
Pulmonary hypertension 1.23 (0.91, 1.65) 0.174 1.25 (0.90, 1.72) 0.177
Hepatic failure 2.62 (2.00, 3.42) <0.001 1.59 (0.71, 3.53) 0.258
Renal disease 2.54 (1.92, 3.37) <0.001 1.21 (0.52, 2.79) 0.662
Cancer 1.16 (0.78, 1.74) 0.461 0.88 (0.57, 1.35) 0.552
Endocarditis 0.59 (0.32, 1.06) 0.079 0.77 (0.39, 1.52) 0.453
Sepsis 4.85 (3.23, 7.28) <0.001 5.61 (3.50, 8.99) <0.001
Acute coronary syndrome 1.10 (0.65, 1.86) 0.715 1.37 (0.79, 2.39) 0.268
Aortic dissection 2.37 (1.15, 4.89) 0.019 3.55 (1.65, 7.62) 0.001

CI, confidence interval; NYHA, New York Heart Association; OR, odds ratio.

Discussion

This is the first study to assess the trends in ACHD treatment by disease complexity and age in Japan. The ratio of admission for the moderate and severe groups increased; from now on, patients with complicated conditions may experience unplanned admissions at a young age.

The relationship between age distribution and disease complexity showed obvious association with medical history, especially in patients with moderate and severe CHD. Among various ACHDs, the SV physiology is one of the most complicated types of CHD. Fontan and Baudet first described the Fontan procedure in 1971.9 Since then, several modifications and adaptations, such as the extracardiac total cavopulmonary connection in 1990,10 have been introduced, and surgical outcomes have improved. In addition to the SV physiology, other severe and moderate CHDs have recently begun to benefit from surgical innovations. At this time, the prevalence of heart failure in ACHD is 6.4%, but higher in patients with cyanotic CHD (41%), Fontan circulation (30%), and a systemic right ventricle (25%).11 More severe CHD patients are reaching their youth and middle age, and the problems that may occur in the future with aging remain unclear.

In the mild group, there was a rapid increase in unplanned admissions after 60 years of age in this study. The detailed reasons for admission might be related to their CHD or other cardiovascular disorders particular to the elderly, but unfortunately it was not possible to distinguish this is the current research. However, it is obvious that elderly patients with mild CHD need medical treatment for diseases common in their age just like everyone else. On the other hand, recent study from Denmark showed that patients with simple CHD had increased risks of all comorbidities and even in patients with surgically repaired ventricular septal defect had a high late hazard of heart failure.12,13 We might need to pay more attention to mild severity CHD than we ever thought. We could not obtain enough data to assess this issue, so further consideration in detail for each disease and group will be required for greater understanding.

In this study, the overall mortality rate of patients with ACHD during unplanned admission was 7.3%. In another study that used the JROAD-DPC to assess patients with heart failure, the in-hospital mortality rate was 7.7% in patients with a mean age of 78 years.14 The mortality rate of patients with ACHD was as high as that of elderly patients with heart failure. There are several possible reasons for the age distribution trends identified in this study. The high percentage of deaths among the elderly with mild CHD may relate to both CHD and aging. Although the mortality rate in the severe group was not so high, they were younger age at the time of death, which is likely related to the CHD. The number of hospitalizations per person was significantly high for patients with severe CHD, which could lead to underestimation of the mortality rate during total hospitalization.

Other factors associated with poor prognosis, such as hemorrhage, cerebrovascular, sepsis, and aortic dissection, were not clearly correlated with CHD at the time of this study. For example, aortic dissection is possibly triggered by the aortic dilatation commonly observed in patients with tetralogy of Fallot and aortic coarctation associated with bicuspid aortic valve. These diseases are classified as moderate and did not match the age distribution of aortic dissection in this study. Aortic dissection in elderly patients is mainly related to aging, but we should note the potential for an increase in this disease at a young age with moderate CHD.

The most common comorbidity in this study was heart failure. Patients with ACHD are more likely to experience heart failure at a younger age than the general population, and the risk factors are age, sex, CHD severity, recent hospitalization, and the number of comorbidities.2,15 One of the difficulties in ACHD treatment is that in many cases ACHD-related heart failure the symptoms are typical, and few predictors have been studied to help with detection, monitoring, and prevention.16 Improving the detection and prevention of heart failure in patients with ACHD may help to improve their future health. Many causes of death in ACHD are attributed to CHD or other cardiovascular disorders; however, coexisting congenital malformations, respiratory diseases, infections, and neoplasms can also cause death.17 Patients with severe CHD must cope with disease severity as well as a high prevalence of non-cardiovascular comorbidities.4 Since birth, patients with ACHD are exposed to hemodynamic consequences and undergo repeated interventions that affect the heart as well as other organs. Therefore, clinicians should take all organs into consideration when treating patients with ACHD.

On detailed analysis of guidelines, it is apparent that the classification of severity and complexity is inconsistent. Heterogeneity with high causative variance relative to the low frequency of specific CHD phenotypes makes disease classification difficult.18 Furthermore, most guidelines consider whether surgery is performed and the type of surgery. In this study, we could not obtain such data, and we classified patients based only on the diagnosis. The 2018 ACHD guidelines do not include patent foramen ovale (PFO) or bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), but they mention overlap of severity, especially with valve disease.1 We designed our simple classification to reflect the severity as accurately as possible, keeping PFO, BAV, and other valve disease in a separate group. Most recommendations associated with ACHD are largely the result of expert consensus based on retrospective and prospective observational studies and registries because of the lack of evidence-based data.19 Development of a registration system and large clinical research studies using simple and unified disease definitions are warranted.

Because ACHD is a group of diseases that requires specialization, more specialists and specialized facilities are required. Several reports have described the value of specialized care, especially its positive impact on mortality rates, and major complications.20,21 The 2020 European Society of Cardiology guidelines stratified patients into 3 categories: (1) require care exclusively in a specialist center, (2) shared care can be established with appropriate general adult services, and (3) can be managed in non-specialist clinics (with access to specialized care if required).19 Although patients with ACHD have better outcomes under specialized care, other medical providers often need to manage and to treat them because of the increasing number of such patients. The guidelines were intended to provide specialized care instructions for specialists, as well as primary care or other healthcare providers.1 One report describes the management of ACHD patients encountered in emergency outpatient departments with pathological conditions such as arrhythmia, syncope, chest pain, and cyanosis.22 Continuous efforts must be made to encourage both specialist and primary care.

Importantly, in the ACHD population, the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, such as obesity and metabolic syndrome, is higher than in the general population. Having to avoid exercise during school age is common among ACHD patients, and an ongoing restriction in physical activity.23 Thus, patients with ACHD are exposed to not only CHD-related complications but also standard cardiovascular risk factors such as aging.24 Guidance on daily life is required from childhood. The most important aspect of patient education is avoiding interruptions in care; a cohort study revealed that 26.1% of patients experienced interruptions.25 Factors contributing to the lack of consistent cardiology care for ACHD are patient barriers, financial barriers, system barriers, and geographic barriers.26 Enhancement of the social system is obviously warranted. Furthermore, a medical transition system from pediatrics to adult, and coaching health behavior programs for the patients themselves are needed.

Study Limitations

This study has some limitations owing to the restrictions on information obtained from the JROAD-DPC database. The number of registered hospitals and admissions increased during the study period; thus, the data included in the analysis were not exhaustive. As a result, we could not confirm the correct number and changes of ACHD-related admissions. Important factors for prognosis prediction, such as the surgical method, presence of cyanosis, pulmonary hypertension, Eisenmenger syndrome and the relationship between comorbidity and CHD could not be assessed. Further, because this was a limited-time survey, so follow-up evaluation was not possible.

Conclusions

Patients with ACHD have risks related to their health since birth, and age-related changes become apparent from a young age, especially in patients with severe CHD. Considering the history of progress in CHD treatment, we can easily imagine an even more dramatic increase in the number of patients with ACHD as well as an increase in the severity of CHD among patients in the near future. Therefore, we should prepare for the medical demands in terms of both medical resources and patient education.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by a research grant from the Charitable Trust of Clinical Laboratory Medicine Research Promotion Fund.

Disclosures

M.I. is a member of Circulation Journal’s Editorial Team.

IRB Information

The Institutional Review Board of Tsukuba University approved the study protocol (No. 1543).

Data Availability

The deidentified participant data will not be shared.

References
 
© 2023, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
feedback
Top