Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843

This article has now been updated. Please use the final version.

Multisystemic Inflammation Influences Prognosis in Fulminant Lymphocytic Myocarditis
Hiroaki Kawano Satoshi IkedaKoshiro KanaokaShuntaro SatoRyo EtoYuki UenoKenji OnoueYoshihiko SaitoKoji Maemurathe Japanese Registry of Fulminant Myocarditis Investigators
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML Advance online publication
Supplementary material

Article ID: CJ-23-0914

Details
Abstract

Background: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS) is a hyperinflammatory shock associated with cardiac dysfunction and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. However, there are no reports on using MIS criteria, such as multisystemic inflammation (MSI) in fulminant myocarditis, without SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study investigated the differences in clinical characteristics and course between patients with fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis (FLM) plus MSI and those without MSI.

Methods and Results: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 273 patients with FLM registered in the JROAD-DPC database between April 2014 and March 2017. We evaluated the presence of MSI using criteria modified from previously reported MIS criteria and compared the characteristics and risk of mortality or heart transplantation between FLM patients with MSI and without MSI. Of the 273 patients with FLM, 107 (39%) were diagnosed with MSI. The MSI group was younger (44 vs. 57 years; P<0.0001) and had more females (50% vs. 36%; P=0.0236), a higher incidence of pericardial effusion (58% vs. 40%; P=0.0073), and a lower 90-day mortality rate (19% vs. 33%; P=0.0185) than the non-MSI group. The risk of mortality at 90 days was lower in FLM patients aged <50 years with MSI aged <50 years than in those without MSI (P=0.0463).

Conclusions: These results suggest that MSI may influence the prognosis of FLM, especially in patients aged <50 years.

Myocarditis is an inflammatory myocardial disease often resulting from viral infections or autoimmune disorders.1 Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is a rare, serious condition that requires treatment with intravenous inotropes or mechanical circulatory support.2 However, the mechanisms underlying myocardial inflammation in FM remain unclear. Predicting the prognosis of patients with FM is challenging because of a lack of evidence.

Some children develop a life-threatening hyperinflammatory state 1–6 weeks after primary COVID-19 infection, termed multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C).3 A similar condition is known as a rare complication of COVID-19 in adults (MIS-A),4 and often leads to cardiac dysfunction, including myocarditis.4 Reportedly, adult patients with fulminant COVID-19-related myocarditis have different prognoses based on the presence of multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS).5

Approximately 90% of cases of myocarditis are lymphocytic,6 mostly caused by viruses that may directly damage tissues in humans, act as triggers for autoimmunity-mediated damage, or both.7 However, it is unclear whether the criteria for MIS can differentiate between the characteristics and clinical course of FM associated with viruses other than severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of multisystemic inflammation (MSI) defined using the criteria for MIS in fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis (FLM) unrelated to SARS-CoV-2 infection and to compare differences in the characteristics and clinical course between patients with and without MSI. We also aimed to compare 2 groups classified by age 50 years based on previous studies on cardiovascular diseases.812

Methods

Study Design and Population

Based on The Japanese Registry of Fulminant Myocarditis, this study is a multicenter retrospective cohort study performed in collaboration with 235 facilities across Japan (Supplementary Appendix).13 First, patients with myocarditis (International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes I40, I41, or I423) in the Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases – Diagnosis Procedure Combination (JROAD-DPC) discharge database between April 2012 and March 2017 were identified. Subsequently, patients with FM were grouped into those requiring treatment with mechanical circulatory support, or intravenous inotropes.2

Furthermore, we selected patients with FLM, which was defined histologically based on previous studies14 in addition to the clinical diagnostic criteria of the European Society of Cardiology15 or the Japanese Circulation Society16 and the histologic definitions of the World Health Organization/International Society and Federation of Cardiology (WHO/ISFC) criteria.17

Individual patient data (retrospective anonymous data) and treatment details during hospitalization were collected from each facility. The data were uploaded to Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap; Vanderbilt University).

This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was approved by locally appointed ethics committees at Nagasaki University and the Japanese Circulation Society (Registration no. 20081719-4 and 10, respectively).

Outcomes

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), and advanced atrioventricular block. Because MIS occurred in younger people, we compared 2 groups classified by age 50 years based on previous studies of cardiovascular diseases.812

Variables

We defined MSI based on the MIS criteria reported by Vogel et al,18 except for mucocutaneous clinical features, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, ferritin, procalcitonin, neutrophilia, lymphopenia, and thrombocytopenia, because they were not included in this study. We also added respiratory symptoms. Thus, the definition of MSI was as follows:

the presence of fever

the presence of ≥2 of the following clinical features: (1) gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea); (2) shock/hypotension; (3) neurologic features (altered mental status, headache, weakness, paresthesia, lethargy); and (4) respiratory symptoms (sputum, cough, rhinorrhea).

Characteristics and events were compared between the MSI(−) and MSI(+) groups. Information on demographic characteristics, prodromal symptoms, medical history, clinical, laboratory, electrocardiogram, and echocardiographic findings on admission, histologic findings of the biopsied myocardium, medications administered during hospitalization, temporary mechanical circulatory support, and events was collected.

The severity of myocarditis was categorized as mild or severe using the following semiquantitative scale: (1) mild, damaged cardiomyocytes account for less than half of all cardiomyocytes; (2) severe, damaged cardiomyocytes account for more than half of all cardiomyocytes.

Statistical Analyses

Baseline characteristics were summarized as median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables or as counts with percentages for categorical variables. Characteristics between age groups were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.

We used the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests to evaluate the association between MSI and mortality in patients with FLM. In addition, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the Cox proportional hazards model to assess the contribution of baseline characteristics to the primary outcome by age group. All hypothesis tests were 2-sided, and statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Given the absence of corrections for multiple comparisons, the findings were interpreted as exploratory. All analyses were performed using JMP statistical software (JMP 17Pro; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Study Population and Characteristics

Of the 1,327 patients identified as having FM presentations from the 2,511 patients with suspected myocarditis in the JROAD-DPC database, 819 were hospitalized in 235 facilities with permission that they were eligible for inclusion in this study. Among these patients, 736 patients were identified with clinically suspected FM. The 329 who did not undergo histological diagnosis, the 23 who did not have histological findings, and the 40 who did not meet the WHO/ISFC criteria were excluded from the study. From the 344 patients with histologically diagnosed with FM, 51 with eosinophilic myocarditis and 20 with giant cell myocarditis were excluded, leaving 273 patients with FLM who were included in the study. Figure 1 shows a flowchart of patient inclusion/exclusion.

Figure 1.

Study flow chart of the Japanese Registry of Fulminant Myocarditis. ESC, European Society of Cardiology; ICD-10, International Classification of Disease 10th revision; ISFC, International Society and Federation of Cardiology; JCS, Japanese Circulation Society; JROAD-DPC, Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases – Diagnostic Procedure Combination; WHO, World Health Organization.

Characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 1. The median age was 54 years (IQR 39–64 years), and 114 (42%) patients were women. Of the 273 patients in the study, 107 (39%) met the criteria for MSI (the frequency of each item of the MSI criteria is provided in the Supplementary Table), and 223 (85%) had New York Heart Association functional class III and IV. MSI was more common in younger patients (Figure 2). On admission, the median white blood cell count was 9,180/mm3 (IQR 6,800–12,550/mm3) and C-reactive protein (CRP) was 4.7 mg/dL (IQR 1.75–10.15 mg/dL). Cardiac troponin levels were elevated in 92% of patients. The median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 30.5% (IQR 20–45%). Intravenous steroids and immunoglobulins were used in 137 (50%) and 101 (37%) patients, respectively. Furthermore, 218 (79%), 144 (52%), and 37 (14%) patients were treated with an intra-aortic balloon pump, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), and a left ventricular assist device, respectively.

Table 1.

Clinical Characteristics in All Patients (n=273) and in Patients With and Without Multisystemic Inflammation Separately

Characteristics No. patients
with available
data
All patients MSI(−)
(n=166)
MSI(+)
(n=107)
P value
Age (years) 273 54 [39–64] 57 [41–67] 44 [34–58] <0.0001
Female sex 273 114 (42) 60 (36) 54 (50) 0.0236
Prodromal symptoms
 Fever 273 200 (73) 93 (56) 107 (100) <0.0001
 Headache 273 22 (8.0) 1 (0.6) 21 (19) <0.0001
 Respiratory syndrome 273 81 (29) 23 (13) 58 (54) <0.0001
 Gastrointestinal symptoms 273 72 (26) 23 (13) 49 (45) <0.0001
 MSI 273 107 (39) 0 (0) 107 (100)
Medical history
 Hypertension 273 55 (20) 41 (24) 14 (13) 0.0208
 Diabetes 273 20 (7.3) 17 (10) 3 (2.8) 0.0300
 Chronic kidney disease 273 7 (2.6) 3 (1.8) 4 (3.7) 0.4380
Clinical findings on admission
 BMI (kg/m2) 261 22 [20–25] 22 [20–25] 23 [20–24.5] 0.9717
 SBP (mmHg) 267 97 [83–114] 100 [86–115] 93 [80–111] 0.1271
 Body temperature (℃) 249 37 [36–38] 37 [36–37] 37 [36–38] 0.1026
 NYHA Class III or IV 261 223 (85) 137 (85) 86 (85) 1.0000
 CPA on admission 270 3 (1.1) 2 (1.2) 1 (1.1) 1.0000
Laboratory data on admission
 WBC (/μL) 273 9,180
[6,800–12,550]
9,060
[6,490–12,575]
9,400
[7,000–12,600]
0.3895
 eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) 273 55 [36–76] 49 [33–72] 62 [42–80] 0.0154
 CRP (mg/dL) 269 4.7 [1.75–10.15] 4.75 [1.5–10.2] 4.7 [2.1–9.8] 0.7300
 Elevated CRPA 269 258 (95) 151 (93) 107 (100) 0.0038
 BNP (pg/mL) 219 525 [318–1,023] 518 [313–1,065] 549 [338–886] 0.8339
 NT-proBNP (pg/mL) 58 7,940
[2,693–20,635]
8,740
[2,512–24,449]
7,936
[4,525–15,113]
0.9208
 Elevated troponinB 244 224 (92) 134 (91) 90 (91) 1.0000
 Creatinine kinase (IU/L) 272 742 [417–1,349] 685 [383–1,385] 757.5 [471–1,290] 0.2936
ECG findings on admission
 Sinus rhythm 272 190 (69) 117 (70) 73 (68) 0.7878
 QRS duration (ms) 249 120 [94–143] 121 [97–143] 120 [90–142] 0.3520
 ST elevation 272 176 (64) 107 (64) 69 (65) 1.0000
 VT/VF 270 62 (22) 36 (21) 26 (24) 0.6581
Echocardiography
 LVDd (mm) 217 46 [42–50] 47 [42–50] 46 [42–50] 0.5650
 LVEF (%) 262 30.5 [20–45] 30 [20–45] 31 [19–42] 0.1332
 Pericardial effusion 253 122 (48) 61 (40) 61 (58) 0.0072
Histologic findings (severity of myocarditis)
 Severe type 162 67 (41) 39 (40) 28 (44) 0.6284
Medication during hospitalization
 β-blocker 273 152 (55) 85 (51) 67 (62) 0.0805
 ACEi/ARB 273 159 (58) 96 (57) 63 (58) 0.9004
 Intravenous steroids 273 137 (50) 76 (45) 61 (57) 0.0828
 IVIG 272 101 (37) 57 (34) 44 (41) 0.1665
 Inotropes 273 265 (97) 160 (96) 105 (98) 0.4875
Temporary MCS devices
 IABP 273 218 (79) 130 (78) 88 (82) 0.4451
 VA-ECMO 273 144 (52) 85 (51) 59 (55) 0.5373
 Ventricular assist device 273 37 (14) 19 (11) 18 (16) 0.2107
Event
 90-day mortality 273 76 (27) 55 (33) 21 (19) 0.0185
 Death and TX 273 84 (30) 63 (37) 21 (19) 0.0013
 VT 273 90 (33) 55 (33) 35 (32) 1.0000
 VF 273 45 (16) 24 (14) 21 (19) 0.3163
 Advanced AV block 273 91 (34) 56 (33) 35 (32) 0.8959

Unless indicated otherwise, values are presented as n (%) or as the median [interquartile range]. AElevated C-reactive protein (CRP) was defined as CRP >0.3 mg/dL. BElevated troponin was defined as troponin >0.02 ng/mL or qualitative test positive. ACEi/ARB, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker; AV block, atrioventricular block; BMI, body mass index; BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; CPA, cardiopulmonary arrest; ECG, electrocardiogram; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IABP, intra-aortic balloon pumping; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; LVDd, left ventricular diastolic dimension; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MCS, mechanical circulatory support; MSI, multisystemic inflammation; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide; NYHA, New York Heart Association; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TX, cardiac transplantation; VA-ECMO, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia; WBC, white blood cell count.

Figure 2.

Distribution of multisystemic inflammation by age. The number of patients with multiple systemic inflammation increased significantly from the lowest to the highest age quartile (P=0.0005). Q1, 16–38 years; Q2, 39–53 years; Q3, 54–63 years; Q4, 64–91 years.

Patients in the MSI(+) group were younger (median 44 years; IQR 33–58 years) than those in the MSI(−) group (median 57 years; IQR 42–67 years; P<0.0001; Table 1). In addition, the MSI(+) group had a greater proportion of women (54 [50%] vs. 60 [36%]; P=0.0236) and patients with elevated CRP (107 [100%] vs. 151 [93%]; P=0.0038) and pericardial effusion (61 [58%] vs. 61 [41%]; P=0.0072) that the MSI(−) group (Table 1). There was no significant difference in the severity of myocarditis between the MSI(−) and MSI(+) groups (severe myocarditis 40% vs. 44%, respectively; P=0.6284; Table 1).

Comparing patients aged ≥50 and <50 years (Table 2), the group aged <50 years (median age 36 years) had more MSI (64 [52%] vs. 43 [28%]; P<0.0001), lower systolic blood pressure (91 [IQR 80–107] vs. 100 [IQR 86–117] mmHg; P=0.0134), lower LVEF (30% [IQR 20–40%] vs. 35% [IQR 20–46%]; P=0.0208), lower 90-day mortality (20 [16%] vs. 56 [36%]; P=0.0002), and fewer events of death and cardiac transplantation (21 [17%] vs. 63 [41%], P<0.0001) than the group aged ≥50 years (median 63 years).

Table 2.

Clinical Characteristics of Younger (Age <50 Years) and Older (Age ≥50 Years) Patients (Total n=273)

Characteristics No. patients
with available
data
Age <50 years
(n=121)
Age ≥50 years
(n=152)
P value
Demographic findings
 Age (years) 273 36 [27–42] 63 [57–69] <0.0001
 Female sex 273 57 (47) 57 (37) 0.1381
Prodromal symptoms
 Fever 273 103 (85) 97 (63) <0.0001
 Headache 273 11 (9) 11 (8) 0.6566
 Respiratory syndrome 273 40 (33) 41 (26) 0.2886
 Gastrointestinal symptoms 273 38 (31) 34 (22) 0.0989
 MSI 273 64 (52) 43 (28) <0.0001
Medical history
 Hypertension 273 2 (1) 53 (34) <0.0001
 Diabetes 273 3 (2) 17 (11) 0.0086
 Chronic kidney disease 273 3 (2) 4 (2) 1.0000
Clinical findings on admission
 BMI (kg/m2) 261 21 [20–24] 23 [21–25] 0.0030
 SBP (mmHg) 267 91 [80–107] 100 [86–117] 0.0134
 Body temperature (℃) 249 37 [36–38] 37 [36–37] 0.0041
 NYHA Class III or IV 261 100 (85) 123 (85) 1.0000
 CPA on admission 271 1 (0.8) 2 (1.3) 1.0000
Laboratory data on admission
 WBC (/μL) 273 9,700 [7,000–13,850] 8,700 [6,640–11,515] 0.0543
 eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) 273 70 [43–86] 46 [30–65] <0.0001
 CRP (mg/dL) 269 3.8 [1.5–8.6] 5.6 [2.1–10.8] 0.0755
 Elevated CRPA 269 115 (95) 143 (96) 0.5502
 BNP (pg/mL) 219 477 [298–817] 596 [337–1,141] 0.0533
 NT-proBNP (pg/mL) 58 7,192 [2,144–14,824] 10,931 [3,529–28,076] 0.0556
 Elevated troponinB 245 95 (88) 129 (94) 0.1597
 Creatinine kinase (IU/L) 273 665 [300–1,319] 763 [457–1,360] 0.1518
ECG findings on admission
 Sinus rhythm 272 87 (71) 103 (68) 0.5951
 QRS duration (ms) 249 119 [89–140] 124 [99–144] 0.1403
 ST elevation 272 80 (66) 96 (63) 0.7027
 VT/VF on admission 273 35 (29) 27 (18) 0.0410
Echocardiography
 LVDd (mm) 218 47 [42–51] 46 [41–50] 0.4584
 LVEF (%) 262 30 [20–40] 35 [20–46] 0.0208
 Pericardial effusion 253 60 (51) 62 (45) 0.3154
Medication during hospitalization
 β-blocker 273 70 (57) 82 (53) 0.5416
 ACEi/ARB 273 80 (66) 79 (51) 0.0195
 Intravenous steroids 273 58 (49) 79 (51) 0.5434
 IVIG 272 50 (41) 51 (33) 0.2063
 Inotropes 273 117 (96) 148 (97) 0.7359
Temporary MCS devices
 IABP 273 94 (77) 124 (81) 0.4504
 VA-ECMO 273 69 (57) 75 (49) 0.2238
 Ventricular assist device 273 16 (13) 21 (13) 1.0000
Event
 90-day mortality 268 20 (16) 56 (36) 0.0002
 Death and TX 273 21 (17) 63 (41) <0.0001
 VT 273 36 (29) 54 (35) 0.3646
 VF 273 21 (17) 24 (15) 0.7451
 Advanced AV block 273 36 (29) 55 (36) 0.3017

Unless indicated otherwise, values are presented as n (%) or as the median [interquartile range]. AElevated CRP was defined as CRP >0.3 mg/dL. BElevated troponin was defined as troponin >0.02 ng/mL or qualitative test positive. Abbreviations as in Table 1.

The clinical characteristics of 4 groups according to MSI status (MSI(+)/MSI(−)) and aged (<50 and ≥50 years) are presented in Table 3. Younger patients (age <50 years) in both the MSI(+) and MSI(−) groups had a lower prevalence of hypertension and a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

Table 3.

Clinical Characteristics of Patients According to the Presence of Multisystemic Inflammation and Age (Total n=273)

Characteristics No. patients
with available
data
MSI(+) MSI(−)
Age <50 years
(n=64)
Age ≥50 years
(n=43)
P value Age <50 years
(n=57)
Age ≥50 years
(n=109)
P value
Age (years) 273 36 [26–43] 62 [56–64] <0.0001 37 [29–42] 64 [58–71] <0.0001
Female sex 273 33 (52) 21 (49) 0.7822 24 (42) 36 (33) 0.3075
Prodromal symptoms
 Fever 273 64 (100) 43 (100) 39 (68) 54 (50) 0.0220
 Headache 273 11 (17) 10 (23) 0.4384 0 (0) 1 (0.9) 1.0000
 Respiratory syndrome 273 35 (55) 23 (53) 0.9029 5 (9) 18 (17) 0.2373
 GI symptoms 273 30 (48) 19 (44) 0.7843 8 (14) 15 (13) 1.0000
 MSI 273 64 (100) 43 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Medical history
 Hypertension 273 2 (3.1) 12 (28) 0.0002 0 (0) 41 (38) <0.0001
 Diabetes 273 0 (0) 3 (7) 0.0321 3 (5.3) 14 (13) 0.1785
 Chronic kidney disease 273 2 (3.1) 2 (4.7) 0.6833 1 (1.8) 2 (1.8) 1.0000
Clinical findings on admission
 BMI (kg/m2) 261 21 [19.5–24] 23 [20–25] 0.0301 21 [20–24] 23 [20–25] 0.0276
 SBP (mmHg) 267 90 [80–104] 98 [80–125] 0.0703 94 [80–111] 101.5 [86.5–117] 0.2481
 Body temperature (℃) 249 37 [37–38] 37 [36–37] 0.0116 37 [36–38] 37 [36–37] 0.2304
 NYHA Class III or IV 261 53 (85) 33 (85) 1.0000 47 (85) 90 (86) 1.0000
 CPA on admission 270 1 (1.6) 0 (0.0) 0.4065 0 (0.0) 2 (1.8) 0.5515
Laboratory data on admission
 WBC (/μL) 273 9,650
[7,000–13,350]
8,700
[7,000–11,690]
0.2929 10,000
[6,685–13,945]
8,700
[6,460–11,490]
0.1679
 eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) 273 68 [47.5–88.5] 52 [35–71] 0.0108 72 [41–83.5] 44 [29.5–61.5] <0.0001
 CRP (mg/dL) 269 4.35 [1.95–8.73] 5.2 [2.1–11.2] 0.4610 2.8 [1.25–9.15] 5.7 [2.05–10.6] 0.0783
 Elevated CRPA 269 64 (100) 43 (100) 51 (89) 100 (95) 0.1967
 BNP (pg/mL) 219 466 [338–819] 601 [327–1,207] 0.2497 479 [212–800] 586 [338–1,125] 0.1039
 NT-proBNP (pg/mL) 58 7,936
[4,525–15,113]
8,685
[3,089–27,110]
1.0000 5,088
[1,023–12,708]
11,333
[3,530–28,077]
0.0319
 Elevated troponinB 244 53 (90) 37 (95) 0.3723 42 (88) 92 (94) 0.2093
 Creatinine kinase (IU/L) 272 746 [378–1,648] 770 [559–1,146] 0.8743 522 [245–1,149] 763 [434–1,469] 0.0320
ECG findings on admission
 Sinus rhythm 272 44 (69) 29 (69) 0.9742 43 (75) 74 (68) 0.3719
 QRS duration (ms) 249 120 [89–142] 114 [93–143] 0.7564 109 [90–140] 124 [102–147] 0.0545
 ST elevation 272 42 (66) 27 (64) 0.8875 38 (67) 69 (64) 0.7341
 VT/VF 270 18 (28) 8 (19) 0.2880 17 (30) 19 (18) 0.0742
Echocardiography
 LVDd (mm) 217 47 [42–50] 46 [41–50] 0.8760 46 [42–52] 46 [42–50] 0.8744
 LVEF (%) 262 30 [20–39] 38 [18–46] 0.2153 30 [20–40] 35 [23–48] 0.0939
 Pericardial effusion 253 39 (62) 22 (54) 0.4040 21 (40) 40 (42) 0.8629
Medication during hospitalization
 β-blocker 273 42 (66) 25 (58) 0.4327 28 (48) 57 (52) 0.7451
 ACEi/ARB 273 42 (66) 21 (49) 0.0836 38 (67) 58 (53) 0.1015
 Intravenous steroids 273 36 (56) 25 (58) 0.8465 22 (39) 54 (50) 0.1932
 IVIG 272 31 (48) 13 (30) 0.0730 19 (34) 38 (35) 1.0000
 Inotropes 273 62 (97) 43 (100) 0.2419 55 (96) 105 (96) 1.0000
Temporary MCS devices
 IABP 273 52 (81) 36 (84) 0.7430 42 (74) 88 (81) 0.3246
 VA-ECMO 273 39 (61) 20 (47) 0.1413 30 (53) 55 (50) 0.8705
 Ventricular assist device 273 11 (18) 7 (16) 0.9020 5 (9) 14 (13) 0.6087
Event
 90-day mortality 273 7 (11) 14 (32) 0.0117 13 (23) 42 (38) 0.0556
 Death and TX 273 7 (11) 14 (33) 0.0117 14 (25) 49 (45) 0.0116
 VT 273 19 (30) 16 (35) 0.4162 17 (30) 38 (35) 0.6032
 VF 273 10 (16) 11 (26) 0.2036 11 (19) 13 (12) 0.2459
 Advanced AV block 273 20 (31) 15 (35) 0.6945 16 (28) 40 (37) 0.3023

Unless indicated otherwise, values are presented as n (%) or as the median [interquartile range]. AElevated CRP was defined as CRP >0.3 mg/dL. BElevated troponin was defined as troponin >0.02 ng/mL or qualitative test positive. Abbreviations as in Table 1.

Clinical Outcomes

The median follow-up was 650 days (IQR 35–1,691 days). Of the 273 patients included in the study, 76 died within 90 days and 7 died and 1 underwent cardiac transplantation after 90 days. The cumulative risks of death and cardiac transplantation at 90 days and after 90 days were 27% and 30%, respectively.

In all patients with FLM, those in the MSI(+) group had significantly lower long-term mortality, including cardiac transplantation (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.29–0.76; P=0.0033), and lower 90-day mortality (log-rank, P=0.0062; HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29–0.83; P=0.0062) than those in the MSI(−) group (Figure 3A,B).

Figure 3.

Incidence of (A) long-term mortality or heart transplantation in all patients with fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis (FLM) and (BD) 90-day mortality or heart transplantation in all FLM patients (B), FLM patients aged <50 years (C), and FLM patients aged ≥50 years (D). CI, confidence interval; MSI, multisystemic inflammation.

Cox regression analysis also showed that age, serum creatinine kinase (CK) concentrations, non-sinus rhythm (SR), and VT or VF on the first day were associated with worse 90-day prognosis (Table 4).

Table 4.

Factors Associated With 90-Day Mortality in Younger (<50 Years) and Older (≥50 Years) Patients

Characteristic   Age <50 years (n=121) Age ≥50 years (n=152)
Death (n) HR (95% CI) P value Death (n) HR (95% CI) P value
No Yes No Yes
Age   101 20 1.04
(0.98–1.10)
0.1433 96 56 1.05
(1.02–1.09)
0.0002
Female sex No 54 11 1.05
(0.42–2.58)
0.9137 62 33 1.17
(0.68–2.02)
0.5513
Yes 47 9     34 23    
MSI No 44 13 0.37
(0.14–0.98)
0.0463 67 42 0.77
(0.41–1.43)
0.4128
Yes 57 7     29 14    
Diabetes No 98 20 86 49 1.03
(0.44–2.42)
0.9337
Yes 3 0     10 7    
Clinical findings on admission
 NYHA Class III or IV No 15 3 0.95
(0.27–3.29)
0.9390 14 7 1.24
(0.53–2.92)
0.6104
Yes 83 16     76 47    
 CRP       1.008
(0.94–1.06)
0.7648     1.02
(0.98–1.06)
0.2522
 Elevated troponinA No 9 3 0.48
(0.13–1.69)
0.2565 8 0
Yes 82 14     82 47    
 Creatinine kinase per
100-IU/L increase
      1.006
(0.99–1.01)
0.1204     1.017
(1.00–1.02)
0.0001
ECG findings on admission
 Non-sinus rhythm No 25 9 2.34
(0.95–5.77)
0.0634 24 24 1.93
(1.13–3.32)
0.0159
Yes 76 11     71 32    
 VT/VF No 77 9 3.67
(1.47–9.14)
0.0051 83 41 2.06
(1.13–3.74)
0.0172
Yes 24 11     11 16    
Echocardiography
 LVEF       0.98
(0.95–1.01)
0.4427     0.98
(0.96–0.99)
0.0255
Therapy
 MCS initiated on
the first day
No 33 6 1.40
(0.50–3.89)
0.5159 53 22 1.59
(0.92–2.74)
0.0928
Yes 68 14     41 34    

Among patients aged <50 years, NYHA Class III or IV data were available for 117, elevated troponin data were available for 108, and LVEF data were available for 118. Among patients aged ≥50 years, NYHA Class III or IV data were available for 144, elevated troponin data were available for 137, VT/VF data were available for 150, and LVEF data were available for 150. AElevated troponin was defined as >0.02 ng/mL or qualitative test positive. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio. Other abbreviations as in Table 1.

Among younger patients (age <50 years) with FLM, 90-day mortality was significantly lower in the MSI(+) than MSI(−) group (log-rank, P=0.0378; HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.14–0.98; P=0.0463; Figure 3C). In multivariable analyses including MSI, age, sex, eGFR, and the presence of hypertension and diabetes, 90-day mortality was lower in patients with MSI and age <50 years (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.12–1.02).

Cox regression analysis showed that MSI was associated with a better 90-day prognosis, and VT or VF on the first day was associated with a worse prognosis (Table 4). However, there was no significant difference in 90-day mortality between the MSI(+) and MSI(−) groups among older patients (age ≥50 years) with FLM (Figure 3D). Cox regression analysis revealed that older age; CK concentration, non-SR, VT, or VF on the first day; and lower LVEF were associated with a worse 90-day prognosis in older (age ≥50 years) patients with FLM (Table 4).

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated in that: (1) 9% of patients with FM fulfilled the criteria for MIS without SARS-CoV-2 infection (defined as MSI); (2) MSI in patients with FM was associated with younger age, a greater likelihood of elevated CRP, and a higher rate of pericardial effusion; and (3) mortality within 90 days was lower for all patients with MSI, especially the younger (<50 years) group (median age 36 years), than for the MSI(−) group. However, in older (≥50 years) patients (median age 63 years), older age, high CK concentrations, and low LVEF were associated with worse mortality at 90 days, but MSI was not.

There have been 3 clinical studies on prognostic factors in patients with FM.13,19,20 These studies reported that older age, non-SR, lower LVEF, VT/VF on admission, VA-ECMO use, and high CRP concentrations were associated with 90-day survival in patients with FM, including giant cell myocarditis and eosinophilic myocarditis.13,19 High CK-MB levels and VT/VF/asystole in FM patients supported by VA-ECMO were associated with poor heart recovery.20 Consistent with these studies, in the present study we also demonstrated that older age, high CK concentrations, non-SR, and VT/VF were associated with poor prognosis in FLM.

There have been no reports on MSI defined by the criteria for MIS in FLM. We demonstrated that MSI was associated with a better 90-day prognosis. However, there was no significant difference in the severity of myocarditis between patients with and without MSI.

Recently, Patel et al21 reported that patients with MIS-C myocarditis (median age 10.9 years) had better prognoses, including rapid cardiac function recovery, than those with classic myocarditis. The authors explained that cardiac dysfunction was related to a systemic inflammatory state in MIS-C patients, whereas in patients with classic myocarditis the cardiac dysfunction was due primarily to direct myocyte injury.21 Recently, it has been reported that the prognosis of patients with fulminant COVID-19-related myocarditis (median age 27.5 years) was better for those with MIS than without MIS, and that patients with MIS had higher cytokine (e.g., interleukin ([IL]-22, IL-17, and tumor necrosis factor-α) concentrations than those without MIS.5 These findings are consistent with our findings of MSI in FLM.

The mechanisms underlying the cardiac dysfunction in patients with MIS-C/A and MSI remain unclear. However, it has been reported that cardiac dysfunction associated with MIS-C/A seems more likely to be transient (“stunning”), with a return to normal function rather than myocardial damage in most cases because of rapid resolution of cardiac dysfunction, mild to moderate troponin elevation, and a cytokine storm suggested by inflammatory markers.22

Conversely, the secretion of cytokines from various immune cells, such as neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes, is dysregulated in the early phase of FM.23 Cytokines may cause myocardial stunning and decrease cardiac function without cell death due to a negative inotropic effect and a direct decrease in myocardial contraction.2427 They can also directly inhibit mitochondrial function and change the metabolic status of the heart to reduce myocardial contraction.2830 These factors may play a role in the pathogenesis of acute myocardial pump failure in FM.31

The systemic inflammatory response is a coordinated set of physiological actions that fight infections, heal wounds, and promote recovery from external stressors. Thus, under most circumstances, an intact systemic inflammatory response increases the likelihood of a successful outcome following acute injury or infection.32 However, Barhoum et al5 showed that a high frequency of RNA polymerase III autoantibodies, usually associated with severe systemic sclerosis, is associated with high MIS(−), although it was absent in MIS(+) patients. These findings suggest that an abnormal autoimmune response may be associated with a worse prognosis in FLM without MSI.

This study has some limitations. The criteria for MIS require certain clinical features (mucocutaneous, gastrointestinal, and neurological symptoms) and laboratory markers of inflammation, such as ferritin, procalcitonin, and D-dimer. However, we could not obtain all these data. Therefore, the incidence of MSI may have been underestimated. In the future, specific criteria for MSI in patients with FLM are needed to determine the prognosis.

In conclusion, MSI may be associated with prognosis in patients with FLM.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Saori Usui, a secretary of Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nagasaki University Hospital for her help with data presentation.

Sources of Funding

This study did not receive any specific funding.

Disclosures

K.M. is a member of Circulation Journal’s Editorial Team. The remaining authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

IRB Information

This study was approved by the ethics committees at Nagasaki University Hospital and the Japanese Circulation Society (Registration no. 20081719-4 and 10, respectively).

Data Availability

The deidentified participant data will not be shared.

Supplementary Files

Please find supplementary file(s);

https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-23-0914

References
 
© 2024, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
feedback
Top