Circulation Reports
Online ISSN : 2434-0790
Arrhythmia/Electrophysiology
Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Between Combination Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy and Anticoagulant Monotherapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Left Atrial Thrombi
Akihiro SunagaShungo HikosoDaisaku NakataniKoichi InoueYuji OkuyamaYasuyuki EgamiKazunori KashiwaseAkio HirataMasaharu MasudaYoshio FurukawaTetsuya WatanabeHiroya MizunoKatsuki OkadaTomoharu DohiTetsuhisa KitamuraSho KomukaiHiroyuki KurakamiTomomi YamadaToshihiro TakedaHirota KidaBolrathanak OeunTakayuki KojimaHitoshi MinamiguchiYasushi Sakatafor the OCVC Investigators
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2020 Volume 2 Issue 9 Pages 457-465

Details
Abstract

Background:Anticoagulation for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) complicated by left atrial thrombi (LAT) is a frequent cause of bleeding complications, but risk factors remain unknown.

Methods and Results:Of 3,139 AF patients who underwent transesophageal echocardiography, 82 with LAT under anticoagulation were included in this study. Patients treated with combination antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy (n=31) were compared with those receiving anticoagulant monotherapy (n=51) to investigate the effects of antiplatelet agents during anticoagulation on bleeding complications. Over a mean (±SD) follow-up of 878±486 days, bleeding events occurred more frequently in the combination therapy than monotherapy group (58% vs. 20%; P<0.001), but there was no significant difference in embolic events (6.5% vs. 3.9%; P=0.606). Kaplan-Meier analysis also showed a significantly higher rate of bleeding events in the combination therapy group, but no significant difference in the rate of embolic events. Inverse probability of treatment weighting revealed that combination therapy was independently associated with an increased risk of bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 2.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14–7.89, P=0.026), but not with the risk of embolic events (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.04–2.59, P=0.275). Net clinical benefit analysis was almost negative for combination therapy vs. monotherapy.

Conclusions:In patients with AF and LAT, combination therapy was significantly associated with an increased risk of bleeding events, but not with a reduced risk of embolic events.

Content from these authors
© 2020 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Next article
feedback
Top