2025 年 7 巻 12 号 p. 1162-1170
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) delivers powerful mechanical circulatory support while simultaneously offering respiratory support; however, it can increase afterload and is associated with potential device-related vascular complications. To date, several randomized controlled trials have failed to demonstrate a prognostic benefit of routine use of ECMO in patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction or in those with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Therefore, the routine use of ECMO is not a guideline-recommended therapeutic strategy. However, in real-world clinical practice, a considerable proportion of patients with cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest have no other therapeutic options besides ECMO to save their life. Additionally, a combination of ECMO with other mechanical circulatory support devices, such as an intra-aortic balloon pump and percutaneous ventricular assist device, may help reduce the limitations of ECMO and improve patient outcomes. The results of ongoing randomized trials will shape our understanding of the role of ECMO itself and the combination strategies in patients with cardiogenic shock and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.