Circulation Reports
Online ISSN : 2434-0790

この記事には本公開記事があります。本公開記事を参照してください。
引用する場合も本公開記事を引用してください。

Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in Patients With Hypertension in Japan ― Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis ―
Tadashi NakajimaAkinori OhShun SaitaTakuo YoshidaMitsuru OhishiNobuhiro Nishigaki
著者情報
ジャーナル オープンアクセス HTML 早期公開
電子付録

論文ID: CR-20-0076

この記事には本公開記事があります。
詳細
抄録

Background:Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used for the management of hypertension in Japan; however, comparative efficacy data within the ARB drug class remain limited.

Methods and Results:This systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials (RCT) indexed in PubMed and Ichushi in Japanese patients with hypertension receiving ARB monotherapy (azilsartan, candesartan cilexetil, irbesartan, losartan potassium, olmesartan medoxomil, telmisartan, valsartan) in at least 1 arm. Of 763 RCTs identified, 77 met the eligibility criteria; of which, 37 reported mean change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from baseline in the office setting and were used to construct the network. A fixed-effects model (FEM) showed the effect of each drug vs. the reference, azilsartan. Using the FEM, the mean (95% credible interval) change from baseline in SBP/DBP for candesartan cilexetil, irbesartan, losartan potassium, olmesartan medoxomil, telmisartan, and valsartan was 3.8 (2.9–4.8)/2.6 (2.0–3.1), 4.8 (2.0–7.5)/3.7 (1.8–5.6), 3.0 (0.8–5.1)/1.9 (0.5–3.3), 3.2 (1.2–5.1)/2.7 (1.3–4.1), 3.2 (0.8–5.6)/2.0 (0.3–3.6), and 3.1 (1.1–5.1)/2.4 (1.1–3.8) mmHg, respectively.

Conclusions:The results of this meta-analysis provide evidence that azilsartan has a more favorable efficacy profile than the other ARBs in reducing SBP and DBP.

著者関連情報
© 2020 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
feedback
Top