Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies
Online ISSN : 1881-1124
ISSN-L : 1341-8521
B: Transportation Economics and Policy
Decision-making on Transport Policy: A Comparison between Scholars and Stakeholders
Shih-Yao KUOKuo-Wei CHANGShu-Chuan CHEN
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2013 Volume 10 Pages 335-349

Details
Abstract

This study proposes a hybrid MCDM model to analyze the transport policy decision-making process and the various perspectives from stakeholders and scholars are discussed in detail. DEMATEL is employed to construct NRM, ANP is adopted to evaluate the weights of criteria, and VIKOR is used to select the best transport mode. The empirical results reveal that stakeholders are most concerned about Feasibility & Execution and Political Climate. The three criteria with the strongest impact levels are Economic Development, Social Security, and Environmental Protection. Social Security, Equity & Justice, and Environmental Protection have the highest weights. The main concerns of scholars are Political Climate and Environmental Protection. The three criteria with the greatest impact are Feasibility & Execution, Equity & Justice, and Political Climate, while Social Security, Environmental Protection, and Equity & Justice have the highest weights. Railway is the best choice among the four transport modes for stakeholders and scholars.

Content from these authors
© 2013 Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top