抄録
This paper examines four articles out of the volume, focusing on the following issues: (i) preference for pronunciation of the topmost copy, (ii) implementation of copy deletion/realization within the phase-based model, and (iii) motivation for morphological reanalysis of copies. While Bošković and Nunes derive (i) from economy considerations, Van Koppen attempts to reduce it to an asymmetry between copies with respect to their feature structures. Addressing the issue (ii), Fujii attempts to accommodate copy deletion within the phase-based framework. Kandybowicz discusses (iii) and demonstrates that morphological reanalysis occurs only when it is phonologically triggered. After examining some advantages and disadvantages of these studies, this paper suggests an alternative analysis that deals with the three issues.
