ENGLISH LINGUISTICS
Online ISSN : 1884-3107
Print ISSN : 0918-3701
ISSN-L : 0918-3701
最新号
選択された号の論文の9件中1~9を表示しています
Article
  • TETSUYA MATSUYAMA
    2018 年 34 巻 2 号 p. 235-265
    発行日: 2018年
    公開日: 2021/02/09
    ジャーナル フリー
    This paper explores the syntactic structure of transparent free relatives (TFRs), exemplified by John is what you might call a bookworm. By observing that TFRs share properties with specificational pseudoclefts and equatives, we characterize TFRs as instances of specifying coordination. Specifically, we analyze TFRs as small clauses with the wh-clause (what you might call) and the pivot of the construction (a bookworm) mediated by Koster's (2000) colon head representing specifying coordination. The analysis successfully accounts for the construction's transparency with respect to categorial matching and number agreement and overcomes empirical or theoretical difficulties that previous analyses faced.
  • JUN OMUNE
    2018 年 34 巻 2 号 p. 266-301
    発行日: 2018年
    公開日: 2021/02/09
    ジャーナル フリー
    When pair-Merge takes two phrases and forms an ordered pair, AdjP (adjunct phrase) becomes invisible since such AdjP has been pair-merged on a separate plane (see Chomsky (2004)). When pair-Merge takes two heads, say v*, √root, and forms <√root, v*>, v* becomes invisible since v* is affixal (see Chomsky (2015a: 12)). There is, however, no purely conceptual ground for supporting the analysis of the adjunction on a separate plane or the invisibility of affixes. Thus, both of these assumptions are conceptually dubious. To solve this problem, I reformulate pair-Merge of heads by adopting a definition of an ordered pair in set theory. Finally, it is shown that the reformulation explains empirical facts such as the double object construction, the cognate object construction, the small clause construction and the ECM (Exceptional Case Marking) construction.
  • SHIN-ICHI TANIGAWA
    2018 年 34 巻 2 号 p. 302-330
    発行日: 2018年
    公開日: 2021/02/09
    ジャーナル フリー
    This paper elaborates on Chomsky's (2013, 2015) framework and revisits sentential subject constructions in English. The first part of the paper refines the Labeling Algorithm, demonstrating that feature sharing requires agreement in which each of the merged non-heads bears an unvalued feature that is consequently deleted. The second part of the paper analyzes sentential subject constructions in terms of the refined the Labeling Algorithm. A novel analysis is proposed in which C and sentential subjects in SPEC-T are required to bear topic-related features for labeling success. In conjunction with the refined Labeling Algorithm, the proposed analysis successfully captures a number of peculiar properties of sentential subjects.
Brief Article
Review
Obituary
feedback
Top