Food Safety
Online ISSN : 2187-8404
ISSN-L : 2187-8404

This article has now been updated. Please use the final version.

Cadmium Exposure in General Populations in Japan: a Review
Masayuki Ikeda Takao WatanabeHaruo NakatsukaJiro MoriguchiSonoko SakuragiFumiko OhashiShinichiro Shimbo
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML Advance online publication

Article ID: 2015020

Details
Abstract

Cadmium (Cd) intake via diet (Cd-D) has been a long-standing focus of administrative as well as public concern in Japan after the endemic of Itai-itai disease (chronic cadmium poisoning). The aim of this report was to review cadmium exposure in Japan by introducing publications from our study group and related articles. Literature survey disclosed that Cd-D was high (up to 100 µg/day) in 1960s even in non-polluted areas. Such high Cd-D levels were followed by gradual decreases in 1970s-1980s to current level of well below 20 µg/day. Once, a very high Cd-D (600 µg/day) was reported for a Cd-polluted area. Replacement of Cd-polluted rice paddy soil with clean soil resulted in substantial reduction in rice-associated Cd-D. In large-scale surveys in 10 prefectures all over Japan conducted early in 2000s, the geometric mean (GM) of Cd-Ucr (Cd in urine as corrected for creatinine concentration) was 1.26 µg/g cr, but was higher in one north-west sea coast prefecture in Honshu Island (>3 µg/g cr). Supplemental survey in 6 neighboring prefectures on the sea coast disclosed that Cd-Ucr in some prefectures were higher as compared with the national average. It was reported that Cd in brown rice was also high. However no clear-cut indication was detected to suggest renal tubular dysfunctions. Surveys in major cities in East and South-East Asia in 1980s-1990s made it clear that Cd-D was substantially lower there than in Japanese cities; Cd exposure of general populations was almost exclusively from foods. Statistical analysis revealed that tubular dysfunction markers increased sharply when Cd-Ucr exceeded 10–12 µg/g cr. The Cd-Ucr level of 11 µg/g cr corresponded to Cd-D level of 59 µg/day. This level was in agreement with the tolerable weekly intake of 7 µg/kg body weight/week, the value recommended by the Food Safety Commission of Japan.

Figures
Fig. 1.

Location of survey sites

[A] Survey sites for the first survey and the second survey. The number in the figure indicates location of each survey sites. Sites for the two surveys were essentially the same. (Cited from Watanabe et al20) and Ikeda et al21)).

[B] Open circles for locations of survey sites for the large-scale survey in 10 prefectures, and solid circles for the sites for the supplemental survey in the 6 sea-coast prefectures (a solid circle is given also to Pref. No. 15 to show that the prefecture was evaluated also together with other 6 prefectures with solid circles). The number shows the number given by the administration to each prefecture. Note that Pref. No. 15 was surveyed in the former survey, and the data were evaluated also in combination with the 6 prefectures because of its sea-coast location (Revised from Ezaki et al13); Yamagami et al40), Moriguchi et al41) and Ikeda et al42)).

Fig. 2.

Correlation of Cd in blood (Cd-B) and Cd-in urine (as corrected for creatinine concentration; Cd-Ucr) with dietary Cd intake (Cd-D). Each dot represents one survey site. The line in the middle is the calculated regression line and two dotted curves on both sides show the 95% variation range. For equations, see Table 4. [A] Relation of Cd-B with Cd-D. [B] Relation of Cd-Ucr with Cd-D. (Cited from Ikeda et al25))

Fig. 3.

Variation in the seven neighboring coastal prefectures of natural abundance in Cd. GM values are dotted. Prefectures (from left to right) are Pref. No. 2, Pref. No. 5, Pref. No. 6, Pref. No. 15, Pref. No. 16, Pref. No. 17 and Pref. No. 18. For locations in the map, see Fig. 1 [B]. The line in the middle of each figure shows the national GM. The lines above and below show one GSD range.

[A] Cd in brown rice (Cd-BrR), [B] Cd-Ucr, [C] α1-MG-Ucr, [D] β2-MG-Ucr and [E] NAG-Ucr. (Re-prepared from Ikeda et al42))

Fig. 4.

Survey sites in East and South-East Asia. Each dot shows the location of the survey site together with the city name. (Cited from Ikeda et al43))

Fig. 5.

Dose response relationship of α1-MG with Cd-U, that of β2-MG with Cd-U.

[A] β2-MG with Cd-U in women. Each symbol represents a GM value for a study group: solid circles for Itai-itai disease patients, solid triangles for chronic Cd poisoning-suspected patients, solid rhomboids for residents in polluted areas, and open circles for residents in non-polluted areas. Solid and broken regression lines are for the groups with >400 and >1000 β2-MG-U/g cr, respectively. For equations, see Table 9. (Cited from Ikeda et al45)).

[B] β2-MG with Cd-U in men. Legends are as for Fig. 5 [A].

[C] α1-MG with Cd-U. Each dot represents GM values for a group. For regression line equations, see Table 9. (Cited from Moriguchi et al47))

Fig. 6.

Smoking dose-dependent increase in Cd-U. Note that the vertical axis shows the increase in Cd-U as observed (Cd-Uob) over the levels for non-smokers. The level (GM) for non-smokers were about 1.26 µg/g cr or 1.26 µg/L (Ezaki et al13)). Δ stands for the increment over the level for non-smokers. (Cited from Ikeda et al51)).

Tables
Table 1.Cd contents in locally consumed polished rice
AreaCd in polished rice (μg/kg)
1986a1996a
Australia9.072.7
China (Continent)7.5815.5
China (Taiwan)74.739.6
Colombia-133.2
France-17.4
Hong Kong28.2-
India9.6-
Indonesia20.721.8
Italy42.533.9
Japan52.555.7
Korea16.115.7
Malaysia36.127.5
Nepal21.2-
Pakistan11.1-
Philippines20.720.1
Singapore11.5-
South Africa-15.8
Thailand13.615
United States11.57.4

GM values are shown. a The year of publication; N = 5-29 and 5-218 per area in the 1986 and 1996 publications, respectively. (Cited from Watanabe et al16,17))

Table 2.Reduction in Cd-D and Cd-B for adult women; comparison in 19 survey sites
SurveyParameter (GM)
Cd-D(μg/day)Cd-B(μg/L)
The first survey38.03.58
The second survey30.01.98

The number of cases was 283 for Cd-D and 484 for Cd-B in the first survey, and 375 for Cd-D and 467 for Cd-B in the second survey. (Cited from Watanabe et al22))

Table 3.Significant correlation among Cd in food, blood, and urine
Cd in bloodCd in urine (non-corrected)Cd in urine (corrected for creatinine)
IndividualSiteRegionIndividualSiteRegionIndividualSiteRegion
No. of cases607307607307607307
Cd in food0.4 **0.7 **0. 7 o0.3 **0.7 **0. 7 o0.3 **0.7 **0. 6
Cd in blood0.4 **0.5 **0. 8 o0.6 **0.8 **0.9 **
Cd in urine
(non-corrected)
0.6 **0.8 **0.9 **

**, *, o and ns for P < 0.01, <0.05, <0.10 and ≥0.10, respectively.

(Cited from Shimbo et al23))

Table 4.Equations for regression lines and confidence ranges
XYTypeaEquation r ( P )
Cd-B
(μg/L)
Cd-D
(μg/day)
95% ULY = +10.18 + 7.19X + 1.772X2r = 0.76b (P < 0.001)
RLY = −1.13 + 14.36X
95% LLY = −12.43 + 21.54X − 1.772X2
Cd-Ucr
(μg/g cr)
Cd-D
(μg/day)
95% ULY = +12.84 + 3.33X + 0.169X2r = 0.79b (P < 0.001)
RLY = +5.35 + 4.90X
95% LLY = −2.13 + 6.48X − 0.169X2

a The equations are regression line (RL) and 95% upper (95% UL) or lower limit (95% LL). b n = 30. (Cited from Ikeda et al25))

Table 5.Annual trend in dietary Cd intake: Comparison between polluted areas and control areas in Japan
Survey yearMethodaDietary Cd intake (GM in μg/day)Reference
Polluted areaNon-pollued area
AreabNo.cCd-DRicedAreabNo.cCd-DRiced
1968MBJinzu600eEnviron. Agency27); Kitamura28)
1968MBSasu-Shiine490eControls60eEnviron. Agency27); Kitamura28)
1968MBNamari-Nishihasama320eEnviron. Agency27); Kitamura28)
1968MBUsui-Yanase400eEnviron. Agency27); Kitamura28)
1968MB47eFukushima29)
1969FDUsui-Yanase3273f36Controls3116M71Japan Public Health Association30) (Re-calculated from)
1969FDUsui-Yanase3234g381WJapan Public Health Association30) (Re-calculated from)
1969FDSasu-Shiine3146f62Controls396M46Japan Public Health Association30) (Re-calculated from)
1969FDSasu-Shiine3189g394WJapan Public Health Association30) (Re-calculated from)
1969FDOkutaki3224f32Controls355M14Japan Public Health Association30) (Re-calculated from)
1969FDOkutaki3358g355WJapan Public Health Association30) (Re-calculated from)
1969FDNamari-NishihasamaControls685?51Japan Public Health Association30) (Re-calculated from)
1969??Sasu-Shiine587108h62Saito et al33) (assumedly AMg)
1972FD28 sites24?Yamagata and Iwashima31) (re-caculated from)
1976FDSasu-Shiine10206h43Controls1050?16Saito et al33) (assumedly AMg)
1978FDKosaka town1092f47Controls1064M28Tsuchiya and Iwao32) (re-calculated from)
1978FDKosaka town1092f70Controls1039M40Tsuchiya and Iwao32) (re-calculated from)
1978FDSasu-Shiine10128f49Controls1061M40Tsuchiya and Iwao32) (re-calculated from)
1977–1981FD22 sites36844M37Watanabe et al20)
1977–1981FD41 sites67437W37Watanabe et al20)
1983FDSasu-Shiine2479h62930Saito et al33) (assumedly AMg)
1991–1997FD30 sites60725W40Ikeda et al21)
1999–2000FDKosaka town4055hSaito et al33) (assumedly AMg)
2003–201116.5Cd-B based estimationf, 25)
2003–201111.5Cd-Ucr based estimationf, 25)

a MB for the market basket method, and FD for the food duplicate method. b Names of river basin, unless otherwise specified. c No. of cases studied by the food duplicate method. d Account for rice in total dietary Cd intake. e Only one value was given. f For details of estimation, see the text. g AM; arithmetic mean. M Values for men. W Values for women. ? Values for subjects of unreported gender. (Revised from Ikeda et al26))

Table 6.Cd-Ucr, α1-MG-Ucr and β2-MG-Ucr in 10 Prefectures in Japan
Pref. No.No. of casesCd-Ucr(μg/g cr)α1-MG-Ucr(mg/g cr)β2-MG-Ucr(μg/g cr)
19271.222.48103
410421.402.72121
1410281.402.08116
159943.163.02129
2013230.982.51114
2612131.483.03120
3411311.112.22121
3911040.962.79102
409981.162.61109
479930.762.05114
Sum10,7531.262.54115

(Cited from Ezaki et al13))

Table 7.Dietary Cd intake for adult non-smoking women in large cities in East and South-East Asia in 1990s
AreaCityNo.aCd-Db
South-East AsiaBangkok · Kuala Lumpur · Manila · Tainan1957.0–14.1
Chinese ContinentBeijing · Shanghai · Jinan · Xian (Nanningc)2504.9–9.8 (21.2c)
JapanTokyo · Kyoto6132.0
KoreaSeoul · Pusan5520.9
Total56111.3

a Number of cases studied. b GM values (in μg/day) are shown. c A possibility of local pollution due to mining was considered.

(Cited from Ikeda et al43))

Table 8.Oral and respiratory uptake of cadmium
CityRouteConc. in air
(ng/m3)
Intake
(μg/day)
Uptake
(ng/day)
Total
(ng/day)
Oral/Total
(%)
Japan: Tokyo + KyotoOral -34.52588b260299.5%
Respiratory0.5–6.7 0.054a13.7c
Malaysia: Kuala LumpurOral -7.1533b53899.0%
Respiratory0.28–1.850.016a5.4c

a Respiration volume: 15 m3/day. b Absorption in the G-I tract: 5%–10%. c Absorption in the lung: 50%. (Cited from Ikeda et al43))

Table 9.Regression analysis for threshold value
ParameterSexGroupNo. of groupsInterceptSloperXc
α1-MGMen+WomenNon-exposed32.1560.2810.57d
Exposed10−1476.7621270.92e11.6
β2-MGWomenNon-exposed30176−250.35f
ExposedTotal29
Aa25−6831361940.65e11.0
Bb19−7760666420.60e11.7
MenNon-exposed17274−820.60e
ExposedTotal16
Aa12−6401662430.91e10.0
Bb10−7937171550.94e11.0

a Cases with β2-MG >400 µg/g cr. b Cases with β2-MG >1000 µg/g cr. c X (Cd-Ucr) for the point to meet; unit for X; μg/g cr. dP > 0.10. eP < 0.01. f 0.05 < P < 0.10. (Cited from Ikeda et al45) and Moriguchi et al47))

Table 10.Benchmark dose calculated taking α1-MG-Ucr, β2-MG-Ucr or NAG-Ucr as effect parameter
ItemTubular function parameter
α1-MG-Ucrβ2-MG-UcrNAG-Ucr
No.a16169c
Median1.461.651.47
Minimum0.780.820.70
Maximum2.513.004.98
Max./Min.b3.223.667.11

a Number of prefectures surveyed. b Maximum/Minimum. c BMD for NAG could not be calculated for technical reasons (for details, see Section 11). (Cited from Sakuragi et al48))

Table 11.Multiple regression analysis to detect effect of Cd-U on BMD and BMDL
Dependent variable: BMD forIndependent variablesR2rP for r
AgeCreatinineCd-U
SRCaPSRCaPSRCaP
α1-MG-Ucr0.33*0.27ns0.56*0.740.86**
β2-MG-Ucr0.1ns0.39ns0.55*0.760.87**
NAG-Ucr0.01ns0.93**0.09ns0.930.96**

** for P < 0.01: * for P < 0.05; ns for P ≥ 0.05. a SRC: Standardized regression coefficient. (Cited from Sakuragi et al48))

References
 
© 2015 Food Safety Commission, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan
feedback
Top