Genes & Genetic Systems
Online ISSN : 1880-5779
Print ISSN : 1341-7568
ISSN-L : 1341-7568
Short communications
New microsatellite markers recognize differences in tandem repeats among four related Gastrodia species (Orchidaceae)
Kenji OgakiKenji SuetsuguKeiju KishikawaDaisuke KyogokuKohtaroh ShutohYuji IsagiShingo Kaneko
著者情報
ジャーナル オープンアクセス HTML

2019 年 94 巻 5 号 p. 225-229

詳細
ABSTRACT

Gastrodia is the most species-rich genus among mycoheterotrophic plants, and is thus an essential taxon to understand the mechanism of species diversification in mycoheterotrophs. In this study, we developed microsatellite markers with high transferability for four Gastrodia species to examine genetic differentiation and similarity among species, populations and individuals. The 12 microsatellite markers developed from a G. fontinalis library showed high transferability for the ramets that identified G. nipponica, G. kuroshimensis and G. takeshimensis. In addition to the high transferability of these markers, we observed low allele variation within a sampled population of each species and allele differences among the four species. The 12 markers described here will be useful for investigating the genetic differences among and within the Gastrodia species, which evolved by a limitation of gene flow.

MAIN

Gastrodia is the most species-rich genus among mycoheterotrophic plants, which obtain carbon from their associated fungi without photosynthesis. Numerous recent studies have re-examined the diversity of Gastrodia species in various Asian countries (e.g., Hsu and Kuo, 2010; Suetsugu, 2013, 2014, 2016a, 2016b; Huang et al., 2015; Hsu et al., 2016; Tsukaya and Hidayat, 2016; Suetsugu et al., 2018a, 2018b; Ma et al., 2019), and, as a result, the genus has been updated to include approximately 100 accepted species. Therefore, it is a crucial taxon to identify species diversification in mycoheterotrophic plants.

Multiple speciation mechanisms and modes of reproductive isolation are known in plants (Rieseberg and Willis, 2007). In the case of Gastrodia, limitation of gene flow between individuals may play an essential role in speciation. Many Gastrodia species have an automatic selfing strategy [e.g., G. nipponicoides Suetsugu, G. okinawaensis Suetsugu (Suetsugu, 2017) and G. damingshanensis A.Q. Hu & T.C. Hsu (Hu et al., 2014)]. In addition to these automatic selfing chasmogamous species, four putative completely cleistogamous species are also described. In G. clausa (Hsu et al., 2012), G. takeshimensis Suetsugu (Suetsugu, 2013), G. flexistyloides Suetsugu (Suetsugu, 2014) and G. kuroshimensis Suetsugu (Suetsugu, 2016a, 2016b), chasmogamous flowers have never been observed. Complete cleistogamy is an ultimate form of reproductive isolation from other individuals, and dominance of autogamy is likely to be an essential factor in the evolution of complete cleistogamy. Gastrodia nipponica, a sister species of completely cleistogamous G. takeshimensis, showed high inbreeding coefficient values, suggesting a high frequency of self-fertilization, in a preliminary microsatellite analysis (Kishikawa et al., 2019). However, the recently discovered G. × nippo-uraiensis is considered a natural hybrid between G. nipponica and G. uraiensis (Suetsugu et al., 2018a), which suggests the existence of outcrossing in G. nipponica.

To clarify the current and historical status of gene flow in such Gastrodia species, microsatellite analysis is a compelling option. Microsatellite analysis should be able to identify the switching point of self-fertilization and outcrossing in Gastrodia species. Therefore, we developed microsatellite markers with high transferability for four Gastrodia species to examine genetic differentiation and similarity among species, populations and individuals.

Genomic DNA was extracted from a fresh sample of G. fontinalis (Table 1) using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). Gastrodia fontinalis is a chasmogamous sister species of the putative completely cleistogamous G. kuroshimensis. A DNA fragment library was constructed using the Ion Xpress Plus Fragment Library Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), amplified using the Ion PGM Template OT2 400 Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and then sequenced using the Ion PGM Sequencing 400 Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and an Ion 318 Chip v2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After filtering for identical reads, 683,018 sequences were screened for potential microsatellite loci using MSATCOMMANDER (Faircloth, 2008). Primers were designed for all sequences containing more than ten dinucleotide or eight trinucleotide tandem repeats using Primer3 software (Rozen and Skaletsky, 2000) with the default settings. A total of 51 primer pairs were obtained for screening. Twelve primer pairs (Table 2) showing clear peak patterns were selected after an amplification trial using eight G. fontinalis ramets from a population on Takeshima Island, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan.

Table 1. Four Gastrodia species and their reported localities
Species/
Breeding system
Distribution records (reference)Note
G. fontinalis/
chasmogamous
Takeshima Island (Suetsugu, 2014), Kuroshima Island (Suetsugu, 2016b)Putative sister of
G. kuroshimensis
G. nipponica/
chasmogamous
Southern Japan and Taiwan (Hsu and Kuo, 2010)Putative sister of
G. takeshimensis
G. kuroshimensis/
cleistogamous
Kuroshima Island, Akusekijima Island and Yakushima Island (Suetsugu, 2016a)
G. takeshimensis/
cleistogamous
Takeshima Island (Suetsugu, 2013), Yakushima Island, Kuroshima Island, Nakanoshima Island and Tanegashima Island (Suetsugu, 2017)

Table 2. Characteristics of 12 microsatellite primers developed from Gastrodia fontinalis
LocusPrimer sequences (5’-3’)Repeat motifTa (℃)Fluorescent labelaDDBJ/EMBL/
GenBank accession no.
Gfont013TTCGAGTGTGGCAGATGGG(CA)2157FAMLC485254
TGATTCCCGGTTGAGCTATTG
Gfont017ACCATGAGTTTGATCCTGGTTG(TA)1057VICLC485255
ACAGGCAGCAGTTGTTTG
Gfont021ATCCAAGGCACAACATAAAGG(GT)1057NEDLC485256
TGGTACATCTCACATTAGAGCC
Gfont022ATTCATGCAACCCAGAGGC(GA)1257FAMLC485257
TGATGTTGGAGGATGTCAAAGG
Gfont027GCCATTAGCTGTGGGATGC(GA)1257NEDLC485258
TGGCCTCGTAACCGTGTTC
Gfont028AACACACACTGTTCTCAAAGG(TG)1457FAMLC485259
TCATCATCTCTTGCTTAAGAGTAGC
Gfont034TGTCAGGATAAGGGAACTGATG(GAT)1857FAMLC485260
AGCCTCCTATCCTCAAATATAGC
Gfont035GAGCGTACCCGATACCAGC(CTT)857PETLC485261
CTTGTTGCCAATCCTGCCC
Gfont038CAAACGTCTGCCCTAGAACC(GAA)1257NEDLC485262
TCTCTGCTGCCCATTGACG
Gfont043CGCTAGAAAGTAGGCTCAAAC(ATT)857VICLC485263
AGTTATTGCAGTTATTCGCCC
Gfont048GCAGTCATCAATTCGACGC(AGC)1057NEDLC485264
CGAGATTCACCAAAGTCGGG
Gfont049TCATACATTCACCGATGGGC(GAA)1357PETLC485265
TCCTCAGTATATTATTCCCAGAATTGC

Ta = annealing temperature.

a  Sequence of the fluorescent labels: FAM = 5’-GCCTCCCTCGCGCCA-3’, VIC = 5’-GCCTTGCCAGCCCGC-3’,

NED = 5’-CAGGACCAGGCTACCGTG-3’, PET = 5’-CGGAGAGCCGAGAGGTG-3’.

To test the genetic variation of the 12 selected microsatellite loci, the following samples of four Gastrodia species (Table 1) were collected: 50 ramets from a G. fontinalis population on Takeshima Island, 28 ramets from a G. nipponica population in Munakata City, Fukuoka Prefecture, 13 ramets from a G. kuroshimensis population on Kuroshima Island, Kagoshima Prefecture, and 27 ramets from a G. takeshimensis population on Takeshima Island. PCR amplification was performed in 5-μl reactions using the QIAGEN Multiplex PCR Kit (QIAGEN) and a protocol for fluorescent dye-labeled primers (Blacket et al., 2012). Each reaction contained the following components: 10 ng of genomic DNA, 2.5 μl of Multiplex PCR Master Mix, 0.01 μM forward primer, 0.2 μM reverse primer, and 0.1 μM fluorescently labeled primer. Amplifications used the following setting: 95 ℃ for 15 min; 33 cycles at 94 ℃ for 30 s, 57 ℃ for 1.5 min and 72 ℃ for 1 min; and an extension at 60 ℃ for 30 min. Product sizes were determined using an ABI PRISM 3130 Genetic Analyzer and GeneMapper software (Applied Biosystems). For each species, we calculated observed heterozygosity (HO) and expected heterozygosity (HE) using GenAlEx 6.5 (Peakall and Smouse, 2006, 2012). Calculation of inbreeding coefficients (FIS) and testing of deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium for polymorphic loci were performed by FSTAT version 2.9.3 (Goudet, 1995). For the evaluation of divergence among species, FST (Weir and Cockerham, 1984) and FST (Meirmans and Hedrick, 2011) were calculated by FSTAT version 2.9.3 (Goudet, 1995) and GenAlEx 6.5 (Peakall and Smouse, 2006, 2012), respectively. We also calculated allele size difference between pairs of related species to clarify the accumulation of mutations of each locus. The allele size difference was defined as the absolute value of the difference in allele size between the two species, and it should be noted that the change in allele size is not necessarily in one direction.

In G. fontinalis, we found that eight of 12 loci were polymorphic. The ranges of HO and HE in the polymorphic loci were 0.02–0.08 (mean = 0.04) and 0.16–0.34 (mean = 0.26), respectively (Table 3). The range of FIS was 0.67–1.00 (mean = 0.85), and all eight polymorphic loci had significant deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.05, after Bonferroni correction). In G. nipponica, three of 12 loci showed polymorphism. The ranges of HO and HE in the polymorphic loci were 0.04–0.21 (mean = 0.13) and 0.04–0.50 (mean = 0.26), respectively (Table 3). The range of FIS was 0.00–0.58 (mean = 0.34), and two polymorphic loci had significant deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.05, after Bonferroni correction). Loss of allele variation in all loci was observed in the two putative cleistogamous species, G. kuroshimensis and G. takeshimensis. High FIS values in chasmogamous species and loss of allele variation in cleistogamous species correspond with a previous study using different microsatellite markers (Kishikawa et al., 2019).

Table 3. Genetic variation of the 12 microsatellite loci of four Gastrodia speceis
LocusG. fontinalis
N = 50
G. nipponica
N = 28
G. kuroshimensis
N = 13
G. takeshimensis
N = 27
AHOHEFISSize of
allele(s)
AHOHEFISSize of
allele(s)
AHOHEFISSize of
allele
AHOHEFISSize of
allele
Gfont01320.040.300.87164, 176*10.000.00NA20210.000.00NA18410.000.00NA202
Gfont01710.000.00NA20610.000.00NA20410.000.00NA20010.000.00NA200
Gfont02130.040.270.86166, 168, 17010.000.00NA16410.000.00NA16610.000.00NA166
Gfont02220.020.160.88223, 22520.140.240.43244, 25010.000.00NA22310.000.00NA250
Gfont02710.000.00NA22510.000.00NA23310.000.00NA22110.000.00NA231
Gfont02820.040.210.81165, 17110.000.00NA16310.000.00NA15910.000.00NA163
Gfont03420.080.240.67185, 18810.000.00NA18510.000.00NA18510.000.00NA185
Gfont03510.000.00NA17110.000.00NA16510.000.00NA16510.000.00NA165
Gfont03820.020.280.93187, 19110.000.00NA16810.000.00NA18510.000.00NA170
Gfont04310.000.00NA22820.040.040.00237, 24010.000.00NA22510.000.00NA234
Gfont04820.060.310.81167, 17320.210.500.58164, 16710.000.00NA15710.000.00NA167
Gfont04920.000.341.00177, 19710.000.00NA16610.000.00NA17710.000.00NA166

N, number of analyzed ramets; A, number of alleles; HO, observed heterozygosity; HE, expected heterozygosity; FIS, inbreeding coefficient; NA, not available because locus was monomorphic. *Alleles in bold are the major allele of a polymorphic locus.

The microsatellite markers developed from a G. fontinalis library showed high transferability for G. nipponica, G. kuroshimensis and G. takeshimensis. All markers were successfully amplified for all samples of the four analyzed species. This result can be explained by a high degree of sequence similarity in the primer annealing sites among the four Gastrodia species and suggests a very low frequency of sequence polymorphism in the sequences neighboring the microsatellite repeats. The high transferability of the present markers should permit not only microsatellite analysis of each species but also integrated genetic variation comparison within these Gastrodia species.

In addition to the high transferability of these markers, clear allele differences among the four species were observed except for the pair of G. nipponica and G. takeshimensis. FST and FST values among the four species were 0.886 and 0.976, respectively. Species-specific alleles were observed in many loci (Table 3), and the size difference of the major alleles between two species was notable (Table 4). All two-species pairs have different major alleles in at least five loci, and the average size difference of major alleles between two species ranged from 1.0 bp (G. nipponica and G. takeshimensis) to 10.9 bp (G. fontinalis and G. nipponica). However, high transferability of microsatellite markers and allele difference are not always compatible. It is common for amplification to fail in several loci in cross-amplification tests (e.g., G. flavilabella and its related species, Tsai et al., 2014), and even if amplified well, similar-sized alleles are observed among taxa (e.g., Livistona rigida and its related species, Kaneko et al., 2011; Stachyurus macrocarpus var. macrocarpus and var. prunifolius, Kaneko et al., 2009). Therefore, microsatellite markers that show taxon-specific alleles are useful for taxon identification, and the genotype data of such markers are valuable for the study of current and historical gene flow among taxa.

Table 4. Major alleles and their size differences between pairs of Gastrodia species
Size difference of dominant alleles
(G. fon, G. nip)(G. fon, G. kur)(G. fon, G. tak)(G. nip, G. kur)(G. nip, G. tak)(G. kur, G. tak)
Gfont01326 bp (176, 202)*8 bp (176, 184)8 bp (176, 202)18 bp (202, 184)0 bp (202, 202)18 bp (184, 202)
Gfont0176 bp (206, 200)2 bp (206, 204)6 bp (206, 200)4 bp (200, 204)0 bp (200, 200)4 bp (204, 200)
Gfont0214 bp (168, 164)2 bp (168, 166)2 bp (168, 166)2 bp (164, 166)2 bp (164, 166)2 bp (166, 166)
Gfont02225 bp (225, 250)2 bp (225, 223)25 bp (225, 250)27 bp (250, 223)0 bp (250, 250)27 bp (250, 223)
Gfont0278 bp (225, 233)4 bp (225, 221)6 bp (225, 231)12 bp (233, 221)2 bp (233, 231)10 bp (221, 231)
Gfont0288 bp (171, 163)12 bp (171, 159)8 bp (171, 163)4 bp (163, 159)0 bp (163, 163)8 bp (171, 163)
Gfont0340 bp (185, 185)0 bp (185, 185)0 bp (185, 185)0 bp (185, 185)0 bp (185, 185)0 bp (185, 185)
Gfont0356 bp (171, 165)6 bp (171, 165)6 bp (171, 165)0 bp (165, 165)0 bp (165, 165)0 bp (165, 165)
Gfont03819 bp (187, 168)2 bp (187, 185)17 bp (187, 170)17 bp (168, 185)2 bp (168, 170)5 bp (185, 170)
Gfont0439 bp (228, 237)3 bp (228, 225)6 bp (228, 234)12 bp (237, 225)3 bp (237, 234)9 bp (225, 234)
Gfont0489 bp (173, 164)16 bp (173, 157)6 bp (173, 167)7 bp (164, 157)3 bp (164, 167)10 bp (157, 167)
Gfont04911 bp (177, 166)0 bp (177, 177)11 bp (177, 166)11 bp (166, 177)0 bp (166, 166)11 bp (177, 166)
Average size
difference
10.9 bp4.8 bp9.9 bp9.5 bp1.0 bp8.2 bp

G. fon, G. fontinalis; G. nip, G. nipponica; G. kur, G. kuroshimensis; G. tak, G. takeshimensis; * Major alleles of the pair of Gastrodia species.

The low genetic variation and high genetic divergence among Gastrodia species can be explained by severely limited gene flow as a result of the species’ selfing mechanism. These genetic and ecological characteristics may be related to factors of evolution into complete cleistogamy and speciation of this diverged mycoheterotrophic taxon. The diversity of Gastrodia plants has just been reconfirmed, and genetic analysis using our microsatellite markers and SNP markers such as RAD-seq will be useful for further studies about the ecology and evolution of the genus Gastrodia.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Miwako Usui for her assistance in the field study. This work was financially supported by the JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 18K06408 (K. Suetsugu and S. Kaneko) and the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund, Ministry of the Environment 4-1605 (Y. Isagi). This work was also supported by Competitive Research Funds for Fukushima University Faculty and a Grant-in-Aid from JSPS Research Fellowship Number 15J12267 (K. Shutoh).

REFERENCES
 
© 2019 by The Genetics Society of Japan
feedback
Top