2020 Volume 93 Issue 6 Pages 443-463
This study extracted the summits of world mountains located between 60°N and 60°S and evaluated their steepness based on the relief and slope around the summits using approximately 30-m digital elevation models (DEMs). The summit was extracted if the center point of a 1-km radius was the highest in the circle. The relief of the summit was calculated from the difference between the highest point (summit) and the lowest point of the 1-km circle. The average slope of the summit was determined for the 1-km circle from the 30-m grid slope angle raster data derived from the 30-m DEMs.
The summits of the world were classified into types I, II, or III; type I was further classified into types Ia–Id. Extremely steep summits, i.e., types Ia (relief higher than 2,000 m and average slope steeper than 50°) and Ib (relief higher than 1,500 m and average slope steeper than 45°), were mostly located in the Himalayas. Several Ib summits were distributed in the Alps, Tianshan, and Andes ranges. Steep summits, i.e., types Ic (relief higher than 1,000 m and average slope steeper than 40°) and Id (relief higher than 500 m and average slope steeper than 35°), were distributed in the mountains of the Alpine-Himalayan belt, Pacific Rim, and Central Asia and African Rift valleys. The distribution of type I summits indicated the importance of active tectonism in their steepness. High-relief and gentle-slope summits, i.e., type II (relief higher than 500 m and average slope less than 35°), were distributed in the mountains of the passive margins in addition to type I mountains. Low-relief and steep-slope summits, i.e., type III (relief lower than 500 m and average slope steeper than 35°), were mostly located in the tower karst region of southern East Asia, showing the significant specificity of tower karst landforms in this region.
Geographical Review of Japa,. Ser. A, Chirigaku Hyoron