印度學佛教學研究
Online ISSN : 1884-0051
Print ISSN : 0019-4344
ISSN-L : 0019-4344
『楞伽経』における分別事識の問題点
曾 柔佳
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

2019 年 67 巻 2 号 p. 941-938

詳細
抄録

The Laṅkāvatāra sūtra (LAS), a Mahāyāna scripture influenced by Yogācāra thought, classifies the eight consciousnesses into two types, namely khyātivijñāna (manifesting consciousness) and vastuprativikalpavijñāna (object-discriminating consciousness). These terms are particular to the LAS.

On the basis of Jñānaśrībhadra’s commentary, modern scholars such as Yasui 安井 and Takasaki 高崎 regard vastuprativikalpavijñāna as manovijñāna (consciousness). However, according to LAS, vastuprativikalpavijñāna is the result of grasping different phenomena, while the function of manovijñāna is grasping an object. Thus, it is hard to consider vastuprativikalpavijñāna as manovijñāna.

While thoroughly analyzing the concept of anādikālaprapañcavāsanā (the habit-energy accumulated by erroneous reasoning since beginningless time), one of the causes of vastuprativikalpavijñāna, Chŏng 鄭 identifies vastuprativikalpavijñāna as ālayavijñāna (store-consciousness), because the LAS describes that ālayavijñāna is precisely under the influence of anādikālaprapañcavāsanā. In addition, Chŏng suggests that the Xianyang shengjiao lun 顯揚聖教論 also shares the same description of ālayavijñāna. Thus, Chŏng concludes that vastuprativikalpavijñāna represents ālayavijñāna. However, since anādikālaprapañcavāsanā is also considered to be the cause of the seven conciousnesses, Chŏng’s argument is not thoroughly convincing.

著者関連情報
© 2019 日本印度学仏教学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top